>claims to have achieved true freedom by using open source OS's like Linux, OpenBSD, and FreeBSD
>uses backdoored Intel processors completely controlled by a Jewish company
Why is /g/ so delusional about how free they really are?
>>53762821
There is no proof of a backdoor. Therefore there is no backdoor.
RMS himself uses an intel processor.
>>53762861
>RMS himself uses an intel processor.
Unless I've missed a memo, when did he change from his chink computer? I forget what he was running but it was some shitty open source computer.
>>53762861
>RMS himself uses an intel processor.
no he does not and he's a jew himself
>>53762861
>no proof
the latest intel chips require proprietary software to even load.
Proprietary software controls the user. It *can* intentionally allow backdoors and therefore is malware.
>companies and governments are trying to bend everyone over and fuck us
>so obviously we shouldn't care about user freedoms
kys m8
>>53762870
For a while he was using a Thinkpad x60 with LibreBoot and Trisquel, so unless he's changed since then he's using an Intel processor. Only the software on the computer is open source, not the hardware itself (although considering they managed to make their own BIOS for it, it's likely it's been reverse engineered to the point that any hardware backdoors would be glaringly obvious). I don't think he's changed his computer since then, or at least the page he has up on his website doesn't make that clear.
>>53762893
Huh I guess you're right. Wonder when he switched.
>https://stallman.org/stallman-computing.html
>I use a Thinkpad X60 computer...
>Before that, I used the Lemote Yeeloong for several years.
Pic related: The Lemote Yeeloong in question
>uses linux because worried about privacy
>connects to and uses the internet anyway
Linux users.
>>53762942
You only give away the data you put online you mouth breathing wangblows user. 10 GBP for posting outside your daycare board >>>/v/ today
>>53763718
so you never buy anything, have never inserted your real name anywhere, are sure none of your friends have mentioned you online, have disabled cookies and trackers since day one, no social media, no anything?
>>53763764
I gave up on facebook back in 2010. Google is never logged in. Of course facebook doesn't access my local files in my system.
If you manage to get the right browsing habit you should be all right to a certain degree.
>>53762893
His fellow Jews convinced him to lead the goyim to the Intel botnet.
>>53763791
just the fact that you had facebook is bad enough. At the very least your name, email and general browsing habits are available to marketers. You're just making sure they only have old data as opposed to new one
face it, most of us were too young to know better when the cookie/social media cancer started and everyone was being tracked all the time
>>53763813
>At the very least your name, email and general browsing habits are available to marketers
So one of the very fundamental thing they teach you in database management is gathering uptodate data. The browsing patterns from half a dacade ago is not relevant to the market any more
>>53763864
they likely don't have the time or resources to sift through individual entries by date of acquiry and just buy in bulk. The argument isn't that it's good info but that it's out there
>>53763896
Yes, what they have (browsing pattern) is obsolete. Privacy leakage has to be a constant process. Snapshots are not useful
>>53762861
>Linux
>developers sign NDAs
>kernel full of binary blobs
>freedom
Haha, nice meme!
>>53762821
you ask that to people unironically thinking RMS is someone to listen to.
that faggot literally wants his e-fame bit by raping Linux.
>>53762939
why is stallman so cute?
>>53764246
hahahahahahahahaha
>>53762821
>using intel not a homemade processor
okay shill
because they have child porn on their hard drives and dont want the nsa to see it
>>53766284
If they have an Intel processor, the NSA can see it.
>>53766380
Firewall
>>53762861
RMS himself is a jew.
>>53762821
there is no way out, even I you write your own fucking processor, your fpga might be backdoored
>>53766472
unless you have 3M€ laying around, even then your fucking fab can cuck your shit
>>53762821
>backdoored processors
How does that even work? I mean hw is on a lower level than the OS, how can it connect to the network?
>>53762821
What does it matter if most of the network equipment and infrastructure has backdoors built right in?
>>53766657
>>53762861
In theory, once PC boot, it'll load BIOS/UEFI, do some hw initialization then exit.
After that, real OS will load.
What happen on certain Intel mainboard is, once PC boot, it'll load BIOS/UEFI but instead of exit, it'll running underground while loading real OS.
But, instead of identified as rogue program, it's marketed as Sytem Management Mode (SMM).
You can google LightEater for an example of SMM rootkit.
Not enough with that, there's also Intel Management Engine.
Google "x86 considered harmful" for details.
>>53766806
Is intel management interface loaded by default linux kernel?
V I A
I
A
>>53762861
>no proof
>implying
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Active_Management_Technology
>>53762821
Wow so is the kernel of my processor going to use its very advanced algorithms to analyze all data on my computer? Then the processor is going to sort it out, and send it trough built-in internet over Intel so that they can use all our private data to develop faster processors right?
>>53767901
Things like this is why coreboot must reject binary blob from Intel.
>>53762821
>muh privacy
Oh shut the fuck up you absolute faggot. No one gives a fuck. You are not important enough to fucking spy on. You use something, you use a fucking service, they have the info needed on you to best provide and improve that fucking service.
Fucksake.
You know what, the fucking library has my information. You think the fucking library are going to break into my fucking house because they know my social security number? No you fucking tinfoil hat wearing faggot.
You are a fucking contrarian. You absolute knob.
>>53768057
>You are not important enough to fucking spy on
>they have the info needed on you to best provide and improve that fucking service.
I'd rather be a contrarian than contradict myself. Data to "Improve" the service without my consent is spying.
Report frogposters.
>>53768057
Average dumb violent didnunuffin American.... MUH FREEDOM.
>>53762821
none of the BSDs are freedom respecting.
Intel processors contain proprietary microcode updates and are tivoized. Even Stallman uses a Tivoized intel processor on his thinkpad x60
>>53768104
You sound like the sort of faggot who also claims 'all taxation is theft'. Fuck yourself you absolute fucking homo. Go and live in a fucking shed in the woods. You really think Microsoft and Google hire teams of hundreds of people to spend hours trawling through the files and browsing history of everyone who uses their services? You really think you're that important? No. Fucking absolute faggot.
No one cares about what you do. Stop trying to make yourself seem more important 'hurr I need to use Linux and port all my traffic through an anonymous VPN or 'The Man' will know where I buy my boyfriends avocados from'
God I fucking hate freetards.
>>53768057
> implying the average citizen isn't important enough to be spied on
> thinks that they go through le data person by person
> what are algorithms
>>53768057
I haven't had a library card in ages. I use an alias to order stuff from stores and pay with cash when I buy most of the time.
People should care.
>>53768202
I don't use the MS stuff because I don't like the thought of being locked down and controlled by proprietary software.
Sure, I'm not a coder, but I can study and learn to read it or pay friends for it.
>>53768202
>You sound like the sort of faggot who also claims 'all taxation is theft'.
You sound incredibly mad with no justification, but more importantly you sound incredibly wrong.
>You really think Microsoft and Google hire teams of hundreds of people to spend hours trawling through the files and browsing history of everyone who uses their services
You really thing that's relevant? I don't care if my data is only ever looked at by computers, it's none of that computer's business.
>No one cares about what you do.
If they didn't care, they wouldn't store it.
>The Man
I find this amusing too, since corporations (and no, I'm not some anti-capitalist, environmentalist revolutionary type either.) are significantly scarier than "The Man" (NSA/GCHQ, etc.) and tend to portray themselves as the exact inverse of "The Man"
>>53768057
>You know what, the fucking library has my information.
that you think this is in any way comparable to dragnet surveillance tells me just how retarded you are.
kill yourself: don't worry, your data'll still be stored indefinitely. YOU are that important. :^)
>>53768202
and i fucking hate ignorant people that do not understand the importance of liberalism.
>muh keynes bro
>muh socialism bros
>muh sanders bro
fuck off back to kuba
>>53768057
>library has your social
they don't have mine
what fucking communistic state do you live in?
>>53762861
There's no proof that there isn't a backdoor. And companies like Intel would be highly suspect to have said backdoor. Therefore that might be a backdoor you atheist.
>there are people who seriously consider their lives to not get watched by the NSA botnet
it's not like I'm going to jail
if anything, I might just get a fine if the NSA knows some illegal thing I'm doing because I'm not black
Lol at lincucks thinking their favorite hobbyist OS isn't backdoored. How do you think Torvalds got rich from writing free software?
>>53768057
>you use a fucking service
My hardware is not a fucking service, it is my property and it shouldn't fucking spy on me.
>>53768400
Linus didn't write the OS, RMS did
and he's so poor he has to eat toejam
>>53768400
WHAT THE FUCK
>rms use intel, so it's safe
>but anon, rms use libreboot
tfw my mainboard are not supported by libreboot.
>>53768057
Reason freetards love their "muh freedoms":
They have children pornography.
>>53768613
ok FBI, keep trying to push that failed meme.
>>53762861
There has been a backdoor since Sandy Bridge or have you already forgotten?
>>53768291
>not understanding that Keynes was a capitalist through and through
>not understanding that Keynesianism was and occasionally still is reasonable, it's just politicians hate the "cut spending during the good times" part of it so never bother (which just leads to inflation.)
>>53768057
>nothing to fear, nothing to hide!
Keep drinking that kool-aid, you statist faggot. Are you really so naive as to think that nobody in power will ever use these capabilities for their own personal gain? Do you trust all of your future leaders to not abuse the system, to silence/blackmail political dissidents, protesters, and whistleblowers, and to expand their own power and influence?
Oh, but I guess I shouldn't care about the implications that could have on democracy as long as they're not focusing on my porn, right?
You shortsighted dumbass.
>>53769814
who said that he wasn't a capitalist? the only thing you could imply from my comment was that he's not a liberalist, which he obviously isn't.
>what is time lag and therefore being procyclical instead of being anticyclical
>what is the crowding out effect
you wanna tell me that keynesianism is reasionable? go back to the theory, kid
