Is there any programming language remaining that hasn't been taken over by idiots?
assembly
>>53762780
wanna get knocked out in real life?
C is pretty immune to this shit since the last real substantial update to the language was in 1989.
Rust
>>53762913
>Rust
>not taken over by idiots
Only webdev languages are taken over by retards because only retards actually like them to begin with.
Though Ruby is largely hipster cunts because Rails popularized it. A shame, since it's actually getting fast now.
>>53762951
Unless you still have your pants in a twist over four people deciding to write a COC for the IRC channel, then yeah. The Rust community is pretty drama free.
>>53763046
I was more referring to Mozilla as a whole, but the SJWs are another supporting factor.
>>53762805
Seconded
>>53762780
humans are idiots, everything that is used by humans are used by idiots
C, C++, Java, Mathematica, MATLAB, Python, R, VBA.
Though I guess it depends on what you mean by "taken over."
>>53762780
I'd tell you, but then I'd ruin it
Is your javascript "app" too slow? Why not render it on the server first and then when the user thinks your "app" has loaded, start loading the bloated JS garbage!
http://www.ember-fastboot.com/
>>53762780
I don't understand why you are complaining about something like this when it's basically what Lisp looks like and you people circlejerk over Lisp all the time.
>>53763278
you really think the problem with that is the fucking syntax? Are you so dense?
>>53763316
This is exactly what Lisp looks like.
>>53763246
>VBA
>C++
>Python
>Java
>>53763339
you're incredible
incredibly retarded
>>53762780
Haskell
>>53763339
That's what retarded "GUYS LOOK I MADE A LOT OF FUNCTIONS ITS REUSABLE" lisp looks like.
>>53763046
>The Rust community is pretty drama free.
Because the COC sends everyone causing the tiniest drama straight to the gulags
>>53764388
And "causing drama" could easily be "having an opinion that rubs one of the mods the wrong way", even if it's a "liberal" thought you espoused somewhere completely unconnected with rust.
>"We should really make college free"
>MAKE COLLEGE FREE? DONT YOU MEAN MAKE COLLEGE FREE FOR WOMYN, BLACKS, AND TRANS ONLY? YOU MAKE ME FEEL UNSAFE, JUST KNOWING YOU'RE SUCH A SHITLORD....B-BAKA
>>53762780
What is so bad about this again? I've never written a line of code in my life.
>>53763046
>The Rust community is pretty drama free.
>>53762780
is this real?
>>53763273
1.) What?
2.) Why?
3.) The fuck?
>>53762780
Racket
>>53765191
Why the fuck are you on /g/ then?
>>53765191
he's importing everything instead of writing it himself.
>>53762814
That's 1999.
>>53765373
>/g/ - Programming
>>53763031
>A shame, since it's actually getting fast now.
Really? MRI is getting fast? Do tell me more about it because, last I checked, it was slower than even Python 3.
Tcl/Tk
Hm, I see that Rust cause a lot of butthurt here. If something cause so much butthurt here, it often means that the thing is good. Cause people here are like ducks. Mommy duck said something bad and baby ducks starts to repeat that without even thinking of analyze anything by themselves.
>>53762951
>>53764388
>>53764416
>>53765373
/g/?
This /g/? The one we are on now?
Have you seen the threads created here over the last couple of years?
/g/ is literally a consumer tech review board for normies. If you don't see this, you're one of them. We literally only have a handful of knowledgeable people left on here and even they don't post much anymore because they just get met with severe butthurt because nobody understands them (read, they're too retarded).
>>53765589
>If something cause so much butthurt here, it often means that the thing is good
Name three examples.
>>53765307
people in the webdev scene really like it when content is shown immediately, instead of white space or unfilled divs for images and whatnot. i think it kinda makes sense, but then you have stuff like this
>>53765763
so they solve their hipster-problem of huge javascript-overhead on the user-side by duplicating the huge javascript-overhead at the server-side, too?
genius.
>>53763246
I see idiots using matlab more often than any other language.
Tex
>>53762780
C, ASM, Bash.
You don't need anything else anyway.
>>53765868
>b-but look at those animations!
>>53765868
Text has to be generated anyway - be it JSON, HTML or just plaintext. Most often, server side generation of text is done by PHP. nodejs has way less overhead than PHP.
>>53763246
>C++
ahahaha, wew
>>53765974
why not python?
>>53766030
I did not say it can't be done with python.
>>53765589
Sadly mozilla has fallen pretty low and is infested with sjw right now,
we can't be anything else than sceptical, rust "leadership" work at mozilla...
>>53762805
came here to say this
>>53765589
is that the best argument in favor of Rust that you can come up with
>>53765589
I feel violated & harassed by this comment.
JS has ALWAYS been in a shit state.
>>53762805
At this point in time assembly has been completely superseded by other languages, using assembly for anything other than learning purposes is idiotic.
>>53763246
As a C++ programmer. I can begrudgingly say I'm one of those idiots.
I think it's unfair to say that any language is being taken over by idiots. I think it's due to the fact that student programmers are hitting the publish button before they're actually ready to hit the market.
I'm just about to finish my second year at university, and we've got to do a compulsory placement year in a company. I can tell you for sure I'm not ready to go out in the field (I started programming only when I started uni).
>>53766142
What about using assembly for representing someone's binaries? Genius.
>>53762780
Here is my c++ meme version#define class for
#define true 1
#define bool int
#define do if
#define continue i
#define break or
#define namespace not(
#define friend printf
#define static num
#define private "fizz"
#define using "buzz"
#define unsigned "%i"
#define operator "\n"
#define typename + 1
#define false %3)
#define goto %5)
#define else 100
#define fizzbuzz main
#include <cstdio>
bool fizzbuzz()
{
bool static = else;
bool continue = true;
class(bool continue = true; continue < static typename; continue++)
{
do(namespace continue false) friend(private);
do(namespace continue goto) friend(using);
do(namespace namespace continue false
break namespace continue goto)) friend(unsigned, continue);
friend(operator);
}
}
>>53763246
>R
>statistics language created for computer illiterates
>>53766173
This has very little to do with OP.
>>53762780
Anything not taught on codecademy. People seems to just finish a course there and leave it instead of exploring further. They claims to know a language as soon as they can print 'hello world'
>>53766142
Assembly is used all the time for performance tweaking. After optimizing and compiling an algorithm implemented in C, the assembly code is tweaked to squeeze out the last few performance gains.
>>53766092
bean was worse oldfag ;)
>>53766202
Compilers do this well enough, if not better. Spending hour performance tweaking for the 0.00001% gain is not viable in any scenario.
>>53766223
Something a person who never optimized anything would say. Optimizing inner loops can easily give you a 1000% increase in performance -- and seeing the the generated code in assembly can easily push you towards the right solution.
This is how you should do it:#include <stdio.h>
int main(){
printf("1\n2\nFizz\n4\nBuzz\nFizz\n7\n8\nFizz\nBuzz\n11\nFizz\n13\n14\nFizzBuzz\n16\n17\nFizz\n19\nBuzz\nFizz\n22\n23\nFizz\nBuzz\n26\nFizz\n28\n29\nFizzBuzz\n31\n32\nFizz\n34\nBuzz\nFizz\n37\n38\nFizz\nBuzz\n41\nFizz\n43\n44\nFizzBuzz\n46\n47\nFizz\n49\nBuzz\nFizz\n52\n53\nFizz\nBuzz\n56\nFizz\n58\n59\nFizzBuzz\n61\n62\nFizz\n64\nBuzz\nFizz\n67\n68\nFizz\nBuzz\n71\nFizz\n73\n74\nFizzBuzz\n76\n77\nFizz\n79\nBuzz\nFizz\n82\n83\nFizz\nBuzz\n86\nFizz\n88\n89\nFizzBuzz\n91\n92\nFizz\n94\nBuzz\nFizz\n97\n98\nFizz\nBuzz\n");
}
>>53766256
It's just not a realistic view on programming. There's a trade-off between development time and performance, and the optimum has been shifting towards lower development time.
If you're creating a compiler you could invest time in caring about performance at assembly level, in general it's just a bad idea.
>>53765613
Python is hated so fucking much on this board, yet its an awfully beneficial and practical language. It gets shit done like nothing else.
Same goes for go, a managed/memory-secure language that finally makes huge framework dependencies like the JVM or .NET obsolete, while still not having to deal with the horrible issues with undefined behavior and exploits that plague literally any widely used C or C++ app. If you are writing a server or networking application right now its basically the best option, especially if you intent to ship it onto multiple platforms.
OSX is a great OS, that had tons of features 10 years ahead of Windows and is an arguably good development environment simply due to the fact that its unix based. The only critique people on this board seem to come up with is "muh HFS", which is basically just repeating what Linus said while ignoring that is has literally zero effect on the user in any way.
Other things /g/ hates that are actually good: Eclipse and IDEs in general, C# JVM (still despite creating framework dependencies), Webkit, SELinux, SystemD, Sandboxed self-contained application bundles a.k.a. apps, list could go on.
>>53766324
>optimum has been shifting
Quite a difference from your previous post stating assembly is completely useless.
>>53766351
It's shifting as in C is viable in <1% of all projects, assembly in <0.001% of all projects.
are there any programming languages good for ADHD idiots to learn?
it's maintaining focus that's the hard thing.
>>53766377
Maybe in webdev. C++ is still used in most commercial applications, and assembly is the way to inspect the code generated by C++ compiler.
>>53766173
>>53766400
C++ is fine, but also there optimizing in assembly is a niche.
>>53766439
Again; you don't write assembly to optimize - you look at generated assembly code and make changes to original C++ code.
>>53762814
2011*
>>53766458
Fair enough. So does this mean assembly hasn't been taken over by idiots while C++ has?
>>53766488
This has no relation to your delusions in any way.
>>53766501
It is exactly OP.
>>53762780
C#, too bad is Microsoft bought xamarin
>>53766396
this baka senpai
>>53766458
>you look at annotated and de-obfuscated assembly code in the hope you get a gist of the countless, mind-bending things a modern compiler does to optimize
fix'd
COBOL
O
B
O
L
>>53766510
>gist of the countless, mind-bending things a modern compiler does to optimize
From my experience, compilers are not very smart at all.
>>53765589
>I see that Rust cause a lot of butthurt here
As a homosexual "bottom" I find your comment bigoted and hurtful. Please delete it or I shall be forced to file a formal complaint with the moderators.
>>53766173
Won't compile on any standards compliant compiler
>>53766551
why
>>53766563
baka, read your copy of the standard
>>53766582
I read it. Literally nothing contradicts the program. I also used a standards compliant compiler to compile it, and it compiles and runs properly.
>>53766631
A translation unit shall not #define or #undef names lexically identical to keywords, to the identifiers listed
in Table 3, or to the attribute-tokens described in 7.6.
>>53766686
>C++11
>>53766715
That clause was only added recently.
>>53766720
C++ 11 was 5 years ago
>>53766731
>Won't compile on any standards compliant compiler
>>53766744
Yes, that is what I said.
Rust is a great language with the greatest community.
>>53766758
You are incorrect about that, friend.
>>53765600
>/g/ is literally a consumer tech review board
also tech support for the other boards
>>53766400
>C++ is still used in most commercial applications
This is patently false.
>>53766851
Sure. You will never find a good job.
>>53766851
Well, if you account myriads of retarded iphone apps, it does become false.
I shall correct myself: C++ is still used in most high quality commercial applications.
>>53766851
C is used in most commercial applications
>>53766856
>>53766859
>>53766862
C++ is great, and is widely used.
I'm a C++ developer.
But it simply isn't used in 'most' applications.
Java has a higher corporate marketshare, but no language is used in 'most commercial applications'.
>>53766859
>most high quality commercial applications
A statement that you will quantify 'high-quality' as being written in C++, I'm sure.
>>53766883
Most used language for high quality commercial applications then?
>>53766890
Incorrect.
>>53766142
>What is disassembling
>>53766907
Enlighten me; what do you consider high-quality?
My anecdotal experience suggests that Java and C# applications for internal corporate usage are the most stable.
Either way, there's no evidence outside of the anecdotal persuasion to prove your point that "high-quality commercial applications" are written in C++.
It's simply a feeling you have, likely based on your own experiences.
All .net languages
Everyone wants to learn java and php.
>>53766223
Embedded systems still need a lot of optimizing, the less instructions the better. C compilers are not the most efficient enough most of the time.
>>53766932
I go to C:/Program Files and open each executable I find in disassembler. Each has a bunch of virtual tables, each compiled by C++ compiler.
Opened multiple goo games I have on my android phones. Each has a huge blob with a binary code in it - compiled, again, by C++ compiler.
High Quality means not iphone fart apps.
Probably Rust. It's new, it's hip and it's perfect language for 2016.
>>53766883
C is used in most commercial applications
BASIC
>>53766324
Yeah and have you noticed everything now requires fast as all hell components and still runs slow as shit?
>>53766970
*sips mochacocha double cream, whipped fat, low carb latte and flies away like le ebin 9gag meme*
>>53767201
Nice argument. Haters are so pathetic.
>>53767211
>Haters
Are you a fucking twelve year old that frequents youtube or something?
>>53767229
No. Are you? I guess you are because you know what's popular with 12 year olds on YouTube.
>>53767211
arguments are only for non-retarded statements
>>53767262
Retarded in what way?
LAD
>>53765589
Chan weenies aren't competent enough to make any significant contributions to rust, so no loss. The code of conduct is there to keep out immature assholes, i.e. the type of person who uses SJW unironically and gets triggered by being asked to change some pronouns in a man page so that LGBT people feel more welcome in the community.
>>53767347
>SJW unironically
DAE SJWs isn't real?
>>53765383
VB was just as bad for it..
verilog
>>53763339
it looks like the aborted fetus of an illegitimately conceived lisp sibling
>>53767368
Number of times I've been targeted by an "SJW" in FOSS: 0, because I'm not an asshole. Leave your /pol/ echo chamber and write some code.
>>53767391
>I
Ok?
>>53767347
We'll see how that PC works out for your project.
>>53766377
>C is viable in <1% of all projects
Found the Java CS kiddie. If you ever get to looking for a job in a non-meme tier field, so not web development, check to see how many companies still hire C programmers, and let me know how many embedded software developer positions require C
>>53766957
And he ignores the right answer. You are completely right, embedded will be assembly/C mix for the foreseeable future.
>>53767406
The problem is yo
>>53767408
It's working out fine. The code of conduct can be sumed up as "don't be a dick", something that decent human beings follow by default and chan kiddies are incapable of doing. You morons seriously think there's a cabal of SJWs out there ruining FOSS projects. It's hilarious.
>>53766959
>Windows
>Quality
kek
>>53767444
>The problem is yo
What
>>53762780
>any programming language remaining that hasn't been taken over by idiots?
Common Lisp
/Thread
>>53767444
>The code of conduct can be sumed up as "don't be a dick"
Literal quote:
> Our open source community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort.
Yeah you have a very funny way of summing things up.
>>53767261
>>53767470
I know what it says. The fact that you think that quote is problematic just confirms what I'm saying. The code of conduct isn't a problem for people who don't behave like petulant children.
>>53767470
Name me any way I can violate your rights by defending some marginal's safety and I would be the asshole. Without exaggerations, cause it is what assholes do when they cry about liberal sjw Hitlers.
>>53767543
>problematic
Ayy, you blew it.
Turbo Pascal
>>53766922
This
>>53767543
It's SJW rhetoric. Of course, it all looks normal to you because you unironically use the word problematic in this context.
There is no marginalized or privileged people in open source software development. Everyone is equally evaluated based on his abilities and contributions. You bringing your politics in can only make it worse.
>>53767543
>post an aubergine
>get banned
>>53767596
Except that was an euphemism.
>>53767578
How can you explain absence of women, gays, transsexuals and blacks in the IT communities? Just look in threads of this board. Mostly of visitors here don't produce anything useful. Instead, they produce hate to the marginalized groups.
>>53767578
Nice chan weenie rhetoric. If you want to get into a philosophical discussion about privilege (hint: you don't actually know anything about this topic beyond regurgitated south park wisdom and garbage you gleaned from shitposts on imageboards), you're going to have to find some other sap to educate you. I'm here to inform you that the vast majority of discussion within the rust project is technical in nature and the code of conduct isn't an issue for people (in fact, it makes the project better).
>>53767648
>How can you explain absence of women, gays, transsexuals and blacks in the IT communities?
Is this a bait?
Oh, I see, you're using someone's else name. That's a b8, stop it.
>>53767656
>If you want to get into a philosophical discussion about privilege
Congratulations on your privilege studies!
>in fact, it makes the project better
Credible.
>>53762780
COBOL
>>53767648
>explain absence of women, gays, transsexuals and blacks
You so obviously do not work in IT!
>implying you even work
>>53767689
Thanks.
>>53767656
Just because it's not an issue now does not mean it forever will remain not an issue. Your right are always taken from you bit by bit, so that at any step you don't realize what you are losing.
>>53767648
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiJVJ5QRRUE
Pretty good explanation for lack of women.
>>53767692
Do people still learn COBOL?
>>53767705
Your degree is literally worthless.
>>53762913
>>53762951
was idiots to begin with
no taking over to be done
>>53767718
Companies still are using it, so why not learn it?
>>53767719
You don't know what I majored in.
>>53767710
Nah, I don't think I'm going to become an asshole in the future. Thanks for your concern.
>>53767743
I can infer from your posts that it was not anything STEM.
>>53767756
You are an asshole already. SJW methods are harassing people into submission.
>>53767692
+1 to Cobol
Java displacing Cobol has been a nightmare except the removal of the mainframes which consume donkey dong and guzzle cash.
Cobol is a way better language for "working programmers" doing business applications.
Gnu/Linux is the best server OS.
Anything but a mainframe and all the trash that comes with it (EBCDIC, CICS, JCL,..) for hardware.
Plus visualization LPARS bloooow...
KVM and libvirt.
>>53767764
DAE le STEAM MUSTARD RACE XD?
>>53767738
Good point, I guess as long as there is a need, there is little harm in learning something new. I may give it a chance in the near future.
>>53767776
Very compelling.
>>53767764
LOL.
>>53767764
t. Euphoric freshman engineering student
>>53767619
>post an aubergine
>get banned
>>53767764
haha GOTEM xD
>>53767840
>>53767818
>>53767808
>>53767776
>all those meme responses
did i strike a nerve
Julia.
[spoiler]it was DEVELOPED by idiots[/spoiler]
>>53767854
Hello fellow STEM! I brought le STEM meme from STEM site for us to enjoy :)
>>53767764
It's good being STEM! It's a nice white male club! No women and minorities! Good life!
>>53767868
>i like to mention im a stem major for no reason at all
Do you find that funny?
You might want to look at what social studies people keep bringing up in open source communities; I bet you'll laugh so hard your sides are going to leave orbit.
>>53762780
>Is there any programming language remaining that hasn't been taken over by idiots?
D.
>>53767899
>You might want to look at what social studies people keep bringing up in open source communities
Why do you care? Are trying to find things to hate?
>>53767916
Oh, I care because of methods you use. When maintainer of another project you want to turn SJW does not agree to your conditions, you start fucking up his life.
>>53767937
That literally never happened,
>>53767937
KEEP FIGHTAN THE GOOD FIGHT, /G/RO!
Holy fuck, you are a literal meme.
>>53767976
wow you sure proved him wrong sistah! :)
>>53767656
>I won't argue because his """opinions""" are beneath me
haha what a fool.
you'll get cucked soon enough, bud, and then you'll realize deep you're in it
>>53767970
it has happened on more than one occasion. in fact, you can look in the OP for a hint of how "big" one can be and still fall to these losers
>>53763031
the reason a lot of web languages are such a mess is because they're fundamentally badly designed. you can't build good frameworks and tools on top of a poor foundation. javascript is all type fuckery, errors passing silently, weird behaviour and verbose code, and PHP literally made me want to end my life (and all i was doing was building a wordpress site with some relatively minor custom functionality). ruby i don't know very well but i remember the syntax not being very good
the only other language that i can think of populted by retards are the microsoft 'visual x' languages. i used to reverse-engineer VBA 'programs' for my job (password-protecting excel spreadsheets doesn't actually encrypt anything, it just changes one hex value) and the fucking shit spaghetti code you find in them is honestly astounding.
i've not used ASP but i am told it's also a fractal of horrible, horrible design decisions
>>53765936
kek
"hey guys there is a function for subscript but not superscript, how do I get that to work"
"Oh it's easy, just install these 6 packages, set a custom command combining 3 functions and it will work"
>>53768003
Forgive me, kind sir, for not disputing your logical reasoned logical rational facts with a formal syllogism and a scientific citation on a mongolian imageboard.
>>53768013
>cuck
Dank meme. Keep'em coming.
>>53768064
>on a mongolian imageboard
What are you doing here btw? You don't seem to enjoy company of chan weenies.
Ruby?
The only reason people hate Ruby is because it is as powerful as Python but the syntax looks infinitely better and everybody needs to convince themselves Python is better
>also Django is the same as Rails I swear guys, look it only takes 3 days to set up a CRUD app
>>53768071
I've been here longer than you've been alive. Just because I browse this shithole doesn't mean I'm a meme spewing, sealioning idiot.
>>53768083
>I've been here longer than you've been alive
How is that related to anything?
>>53768098
Figure it out yourself with your rational STEM logic.
>>53768064
>you can't provide logical reasons for any argument because you haven't taken the course I have from my university!
>>53768050
i like tex but it has all the trappings of a language that's not undergone significant revision in like 20 years and really fucking needs it
>>53768108
I'm not in STEM field.
>>53768081
end
>>53768115
I used Tex for maybe 3-4 years now, but really I'm doubting if it's still worth all the pain. I have some pre-configured projects I just copy paste but every time I start something new I notice how much work it really is.
>>53768108
>if only someone could beat my supreme arguments and logical wit
>no, i won't provide any logical foundations because you are beneath me, prole
>haha i win again!
>>53767692
This.
>>53768050
Most of the users are to blame because they have absolutely no clue about TeX/LaTeX internals & typesetting in general and need a package for everything.
>just put it in a box and raise it
>w-what are you talking about?
>>53768164
>sigh logical debate is apparently not welcome among emotional humans
>*snort*
>cuck
>>53768211
smells of projecting, James
>>53768205
this is largely true, especially of you look at stackexchange comments where usually the highest voted comment is retarded and the ones all the way down are simple and logical.
but
>>just put it in a box and raise it
is something that should not be necessary in the first place.
>>53768211
>>53768211
>>53768164
>>53768120
>>53768108
>>53768108
>>53768083
>>53768071
>>53768064
was /g/ always this bad
>>53765373
Programming isn't technology, faggot. Technology allows you to program, so learn your fucking place, monkey.
>>53768270
yeah, but it got worse when SJWs and shills started coming here.
>>53768270
/g/ is almost as cancerous as /sci/
>>53768277
>>53767421
C is deprecated by C++ like how JavaScript is deprecated by Jquery
>>53768239
>ugh.... projection much? *sniff* i'm afraid sniff* you forfeit your position, good sir, on account of your failure to provide logical rational debate facts. g'day
>>53768270
Do you feel your safe space threatened?
>>53768346
>logical rational debate facts
You keep saying these words but you won't touch them.
>>53768329
>Javascript is deprecated by jquery
How in the fuck anyone could have a retarded thought like that is beyond me.
>>53768418
Javascript deprecated itself
>>53768418
Saying that C is deprecated by C++ might provoke that thought.
>>53766563
well meem'd tomodachi
There is literally no good reason to use C over C++
>>53768377
>silly cucks just won't touch my objective rational debate points... if only people were logical, like me... *sigh*
>>53768601
Cool. Anything else?
How about you start posting ebin STEM memes again?
>>53768618
I'l pass. I leave the memeing to STEMlords like you.
>>53768644
>STEMlords
Do you have some reading disability?
>>53768468
Simplicity (tm)
im a first year cs student should i continue to bother with java? i like to think im alright at it even though im still learning.
>>53768661
No, but you might.
>>53762780
no
/bread
>>53768701
There's literally no good reason to use C over C++
>>53768745
Can you provide an argument though?
>>53768774
I can refer you to a specialist instead so you can take it up with him.
>>53768857
Ok? I wonder if you understand that you make less and less sense.
>>53762780
python
fuck ruby
>>53766349
>Eclipse
>>53762805
t. Pajeet
>>53769133
>Pajeet
>ever touching assembly
>tfw actually like rust, but can't discuss it here because every time some faggot brings up politics
>>53769333
ha faggot
>>53768366
>le safe space meme
>>>/v/
>>53768714
Yeah. Whether it's bad or not it's valuable to know because it's the most widely-used programming language right now.
>>53769407
This, you can't really avoid it no matter how much you try
>>53769407
faggotry like you perpetuates java
>>53762780
C and Pascal.
>>53762780
Nope.
>>53769333
In other words
>too much of a faggot to discuss it anywhere outside my /r/rust CoC safe space echo chamber because my precious feelings get hurt
>>53769333
yeah it's a big fucking problem when something as benign as a language gets attached to an ideology.
why do you think we bring it up?
>>53767648
>transsexuals
too obvious, 5/10
>>53767648
>Just look in threads of this board. Mostly of visitors here don't produce anything useful.
wew lad.
i guess the idea of an "anonymous" image board must've went right over your head.
>>53768886
Hate to tell you, dongleboy, but Ruby has successfully not adepted the SJW CoCk.
>>53768277
>Programming isn't technology
>>53765589
>>53767549
>>53767648
Really can't tell if bait or real
>>53762805
/thread
>>53766485
he's talking about C, not C++ you mongoloid
>>53769922
Is this a joke? The Ruby "community" pioneered SJWing up programming.
it's hard to find any normie using object pascal
so yeah, it's comfy in here, at least on the personal projects side
>>53771358
delphi*
As a C++ programmer, I find it hard to find others who know the language. Maybe that doesn't have a lot of idiots? Anyone who's an idiot probably moved onto some retard language like Rust, Go, Java, or Python.
>>53762805
good luck hand writing efficient assembly for superscalar processors with deep pipelines faggot
