>tfw I've been using a vga cable on a gtx 970 this whole time
>mfw you wasted time making this thread to tell people that you're poor/retarded/both
GTX 970
/thread
>>53655304
3.5G or RAM doesn't need much.
That is perfectly fine as long you don't care to go above 1080p.
>970
Not that you could even go above 1080p but just FYI.
>>53656289
You can go above 1080 with a VGA cable. I've done 2048x1536 with one.
>>53656289
Uh no, VGA is not fine for 1080p are you retarded? Yes it works but that doesn't mean it's good. buy a $5 DVI cable and your quality increases a lot... using VGA is shoe on head retarded.
>>53658356
and why?
>>53659164
Not same guy, but interference, an echoing of images, wired ass problems that occurs like colors changing for no really good reason because there is no error checking.
DVI is definitely better.
>>53655304
>3.5
>>53656289
VGA is analogue. It looks like shit compared to DVI
>>53655304
>970
yes you are underage
pls mods do your job
>>53658356
Didn't know there was a correlation between those two
>>53655304
Me too, but a 980, I also use a CRT.
At least it doesn't have HDMI's limitations.
>VGA
>DVI
If you aren't using DP, you're part of the problem
>>53660717
>>53660761
>CRT
oh god I hope youre trolling
>>53660823
DVI is the way to go, my glorious Korean monitors don't have displayport
>>53660761
Me too! 1024MB ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series and Nokia Multigraph 445Xpro
>>53660823
DP, DVI and HDMI are all the same dipshit
>>53659955
>Not same guy, but interference, an echoing of images, wired ass problems that occurs like colors changing for no really good reason because there is no error checking.
>DVI is definitely better.
I've been using VGA on with my screen for the last 8 years. It just works and none of above mentioned issues ever occurred.
>>53656527
>>53658356
>they didn't get the joke
>>53662023
Display Port is not the same, very different interface. They are all digital signals though. So in that respect, yea.
>>53655304
Not surprised coming from a 970 owner.
>>53662116
Get a monitor with 1080p or better res.
Connect with VGA. Look at the picture, how crisp it is (or lack there of) and the color range.
Now try with DVI or HDMI, or Display Port.
You will likely notice an increase in image quality and clarity. Better color range, etc. Unless you're one of those guys who are half blind.
>>53662186
You can passively convert between DVI/HDMI - DisplayPort, the similarity in the protocols, works out of the box.
>>53662214
>>53660643
This meme is so lame.
>hurr durr poor fag gtx 970
Literally the second best card out right now
>hurr durr poor
Costs almost 400$ fucking retards
>>53665087
R9 390 is better you dip
>>53666220
Sure thing bro.
running a crossfire setup of r9 290x ...meh does the job
What do if a 1080p monitor only has a VGA input?
>>53660823
Unless you need a KVM. Then welcome to "we're all new at this, sorry your shits fucked up family."
Hardware disconnected.
Window positions every man for himself.
Fucking hardware discovery dot wav all day.
>>53660697
There most certainly is
I dont get it. Whats wrong with vga?
Ive been using a DVI to vga converter to hook up my GTX660 to my 1080p minitor and have never had any problems.
>>53665087
>970
>best
>>53665087
970 is a gimped card. Nvidia fucked you in the ass you dumb kid
>>53662253
A double-blind test is needed for this. This sounds like one of those Monster Cable thing.
>digital to analog conversion
vs
>direct digital
Doesn't VGA even have worse colors than DVI and HDMI or something like that?
>>53667319
>Whats wrong with vga?
analog, subject to interference, can't do anything bigger than 1080p
>>53667720
naa vgea has smooder graphics
>>53667565
No, see better cables ACTUALLY WORK with VGA. Because VGA is analogue, the signal degrades. Dvi d and HDMI are digital, so the signal's the same at both ends.
>>53666516
audibly kek'd
>>53655304
How is that even possible are you fucking retarded?
wait im using an hdmi on my r9 390 at 1080p
ummm analog is better than digital don't listen to these anons who probably have knowledge of electric signals, bit parity and encoding
>>53665087
>$400
>alot
Spent that on a motherboard senpai, bye pissboy
>>53673299
You are the 1%. the rest of the world takes hand me downs and deals and buys things on credit.
>>53659955
If you have a shit-tier vga cable, sure.
But don't use a shit-tier vga cable.
>>53662149
I guess I didn't, and I'm betting the joke (if there is one) is stupid.
>>53662253
Are you basing this experience on the Xbox 360 vga cable? Because it has issues like this unless you use the official cable, but it's not like this for PCs.
VGA cables do have limits, but they're higher than 1080.
>>53667720
Not unless you're talking about 10-bit color. For normal color VGA identical to DVI and HDMI.
>>53675352
*Cheap* VGA cables can cause such issues too, while good quality cables doesn't have any issues.
>>53661149
>2016
>not using a superior CRT
letopkek
>>53655304
actually 3.5GB of the advertised 4GB and 56 ROPS out of the advertised 64 ROPs doesn't need anything better
