>>53628998
ur a meme

>>53628998
if you know to efficiently overclock, not at all
if you're like me four years ago when i bought my 3650k, then yes

>>53628998
If you are doing CPU intensive tasks -- not meme.

If you aren't doing CPU intensive tasks -- most likely meme.

Also great thread.

>>53629039
>Also great thread.
Hey thanks back to you.

>>53629022
Go on

>>53629015
>ur a meme
no u

>>53629015
/thread

Right now an i5 6600 is 220€ vs 233€ for the k version. Even if you don't plan on overclocking, that's 0.2ghz for 13€. I don't see when would it ever make sense to get the non-k version.

Same with the 6700, 0.6ghz for 32€.

>>53629178
Yeah but if overclocking isnt going be of much use i would probably be fine with an i5-4460 which is ~90$CAD less than an i5-4690k

>>53629178
And the i5 6600 is poor value.

The only Skylakes worth looking at are

>i3-6100
>i5-6500
>i5-6600K
>E3-1230v5
>i7-6700K

>>53629383
and if he goes with the K and at any point he decides "hey I want to overclock" then it won't be a problem at all.

Not worth the extra cost for the cpu, mobo and cooler in my opinion.

>>53629085
>Go on

if you're a dumb kid who says

>well i'm definitely going to overclock someday i mean i'm tech-savvy and all so why not

turns out i've never had a single moment where i thought "gee, now i really need those extra few hundred Mhz or i won't be able to do what I have to" so i just don't bother and pissed 40 euros down the sink