Every website you ever visit is 99% likely to be connected in some way to google's servers for analytics, advertisements or other reasons.
Literally every single search term you ever typed, every single website you've visited, every single mail you've send are all logged forever in google's severs next to your name.
How do you deal with this face?
>>53612990
>deal
>face
I might be having a stroke, ignore that.
>>53612990
http://prism-break.org/
>>53612990
>next to your name
no it's not
>>53613109
Unless you use a VPN/proxy/tor etc, all google needs is a few megabytes worth of text files from your ISP.
They don't admit it, but I'm 100% sure that they build a profile based on your identity, not just any short lived dynamic IP.
>>53612990
>How do you deal with this
by not being an American
>>53612990
>99
try 100%
>>53612990
I love it, makes everything more convenient and personalized to my own tastes.
>mfw if a hacker was ever able to find and release all the things I ever searched for on google
>>53615401
pretty much this
If sites are sending that information to Google (and for most of what you said, they really can't, have you even looked at Google's product APIs?) that's their fault, not Google's fault. There are anonymization options.
>>53613196
Why the fuck would your ISP give Google information?
>>53615380
mild kek
>>53613196
I am not sure in which third world country you live but an ISP doing that in Europe would get raped.
![[worried laughter].gif](https://i.imgur.com/rLe2NAP.gif "[worried laughter].gif")
>>53615380
>>53612990
not chiru.no
>>53612990
i just accept it and get on with my life. all of the measures required to be as anon as possible is not worth the effort, just blame it on being born in le wrong generation.
>NoScript
>never allow google-analytics.com
>>53617540
The UK wants to force companies to retain records of every connection a user makes for a year.
>>53617679
Yeah, similar shit happened here in Germany but EU told them to suck a dick. And 1 year? Holy shit. How comes it's still legal for you guys?
>https://www.loc.gov/law/help/eu-data-retention-directive/eu.php
>>53617764
Looking it up it seems like parts of the previous law were struck down due to that same EU ruling. Why they're trying to pass a new law with even more expansive powers that will probably just as illegal can probably be explained as "they're malicious idiots". The law hasn't been passed yet so hopefully it'll be ripped apart like it deserved soon. It's a rushed piece of shit.
>>53617679
What a shit country
