Objectively speaking(I don't care about the price) what are the best monitors for photo and video editing? Is it still the apple thunderbolt display?
Apple displays a shit, the correct answer is dell ips
>>53536594
>I don't care about the price
eizo coloredge
>>53536643
>noname chinese shit
no thanks
>>53536618
This, though their anti-glare coatings look like grainy asshole. Samsung has some good options too.
>>53536594
>still
It never was. Appleshit color accuracy and delta-Es are fucking atrocious unprofessional hobbyist level shit.
>>53536594
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2402101,00.asp
>>53536660
>eizo
>noname chinese shit
bait harder hext time
>>53536660
> browsing /g/
> calling eizo noname
kill yourself faggot
>>53536699
Enjoying those dead pixels?
>Best monitor
>Its not OLED
>>53536643
>eizo
>noname
God...
>>53536594
Nah. Apple is losing the professional artist market.
Say what you want about Steve Jobs, but...
>>53536594
Where is my 5K ACD?
eizo is rebranded Samsung with an increased price. Ignore the shills.
>>53536618
This guy is right. The Apple Displays have NEVER been worth it. Dell IPS displays are a really solid professional choice.
An iMac Retina I'd assume.
>I care about color accuracy
Buy a monitor with a 10 bit IPS display.
>Dell Ultrasharp
>HP Dreamcolor
>Eizo
https://pcmonitors.info/dell/dell-up3017q-4k-uhd-oled-monitor/
4K Dell OLED is going to hit the market at the end of this month.
That'll be a pretty good option.
10 bit, 100% Adobe RGB and 97.8% of DCI-P3.
Will cost 5k though.
>>53538478
nice bait
Yes definitely. Ignore the autists that recommend Dell or Korean shit *barf*.
Apple - the neurotypicals' choice.
>>53536708
Are you really THIS retarded?
>>53536594
>still
AOC masterrace senpai
