>Sony VR only costs 400 bucks
>more VR games for sure
>better VR games for sure too, because there is only 1 hardware to adapt for
>better experience, because it runs perfectly fine
[ x ]PC faggots rekt
Confirmed
You pay thousands of bucks to get some shitty optmized VR games.
>>53518185
/v/ pls stay go
>>53518185
Go away you fucking /v/idiot.
>>53518185
>better experience
Yeah, no...
Sitting in a chair, wiggling around some controllers is not a good experience.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIFSt0YSDls
You clearly have not tried VR if you think seated experiences are comparable to roomscale on the Vive.
>>53518190
>>53518236
>>53518350
>clearly have no clue about immersion
>>53518185
And... No porn.
OOPS! Wow, the only thing that matters is a complete fail.
>better VR games for sure too, because there is only 1 hardware to adapt for
>better experience, because it runs perfectly fine
Console that has a hard time running anything 1080p at 60FPS is very good for VR that pretty much requires twice the power than normal software needs.
>>53518185
>better experience, because it runs perfectly fine
a console that can barely run games over 40 FPS will not be a better experience. Besides, by the time PSVR comes out, OR and Vive will cost just as much as PSVR and have much better tech and games. I'm ordering the Vive this month as it won't be in the UK till May
>>53518376
>>53518395
>butthurt moronic PC MUH MASTERRACE faggots
>>53518458
PC is objectively better in literally every way. You can run arbitrary code on it, it is cheaper for better performance, and it has loads of different input methods.
Fuck off you moronic /v/ piece of shit. This is a technology board, not a board for idiots playing vidya games in their mother's basement.
>>53518185
>>better VR games for sure too, because there is only 1 hardware to adapt for
>>better experience, because it runs perfectly fine
VR requires very high framerates with no stuttering/dips at all, at a high resolution. Your shitty console isn't going to be able to do that.
But then again, who cares? VR is nothing but a shitty gimmick that's going to die out in a couple of years.
>>53518367
This. Pron and game mods with it are the only reason I would pay for a headset.
>>53518458
>oh man somebody is arguing with facts
>BETTER CALL HIM A FAGGOT
>>53518482
>You can run arbitrary code on it
PC faggots in a nutshell.
You know nothing about optimization.
>just buy more expensive hardware
>>53518534
>brings up the advantages of having a general purpose device as opposed to a locked down piece of shit
>MUH OPTIMIZATION
You realize most optimization comes from coding strategies and not simple compiler optimizations, right? Things like maintaining spatial and temporal locality to take advantage of cache? On top of this, you are retarded if you think people are doing special optimizations for your PlayStation. Developers just write everything in C/C++ and cross compile with a minimal number of changes needed.
>>53518350
cool, they made m&b shitty and slow and added wagglan'. can't wait.
>>53518458
>hasn't heard about motion sickness occurring on too low FPS
>>53518367
Are you all forgetting that it doesn't have to be made for the pc to be used with a pc.
>>53518185
>>/v/
>960x1080
ayy lmao
>>53518185
>paying for VR when you can just take a few tabs and tune out of the real world into a more immersive environment than military shooter grey ops 5
>Sony VR only costs 400 bucks
that's as much as the console. make it 250 and you'd have a point. otherwise it's just going to die like the eye(tm).
This is going to flop, Sony has vastly underestimated what it means to run VR. The PS4 does not have enough performance to drive good frame rates (60+) at 1920*1080 (playstation VR total res).
In addition to this the resolution is shit. People have been recommending 2560*1440 as the optimum resolution because of how fucking close your eyes are to the screen. The Oculus rift barely matches this res right now.
>>53518185
> meme vr
> a screen on a box closer to your face
>>53519242
>The PS4 does not have enough performance to drive good frame rates (60+) at 1920*1080 (playstation VR total res).
It probably could if they dropped the graphics quality down to an early PS3 title
>>53518185
>>Sony VR only costs 400 bucks*
*requires PS camera sold separately
>>53519372
The camera literally costs 1 Neptunia game
>>53519298
That pretty much kills the purpose of VR. The mongolian dancer is right, sony bit off more than it could chew. Either they release VR games with shitty graphics or with shitty frame rates. Sony is fucked either way.
Is there even a market for Sony VR? Given that most of the PS4's sales were due to it being the dudebro multiplat machine instead of the Xbox, I'm confused why Sony is trying to enter the VR market. You're paying the release price of the console again just for more hardware, and doubling the size of your console just to play VR games. Phone-based VR is fine for normies, and enthusiasts will want PCVR to max out their hardware. Who's left? Who's willing to spend $400 on sub-standard VR? the Morpheus is going to flop because it's neither cheap nor good, all it has are games and the PS4 has none anyway.
No one in this thread knows about Sony's magical interpolation plans
60->120! it's that easy!
>>53519460
to be fair, they could stylize the graphics. Cel-shaded weaboo waifu simulators would probably work quite well
>>53519499
Actually they will do 30-40fps->120fps and they will get away with it.
This will be the more expensive gimmick in the history of videogames. 95% of PSVR games will be turret style, as in Cardboard, with a fixed horizon and things coming to you. It will be soo tiresome after a few days.
But Sega, please do a new Virtua Cop for it by the way.
>>53519372
*requires PS camera AND 2 playstation lighting dildos
>>53518185
>[ x ]PC faggots rekt
Back to /v/ you faggot.
>>53519460
I hope they at least go for shitty graphics. It's better for business to have a disappointed customer over a customer, that vomited all over his floor because of your product.
Do you people not understand that a company the size of Sony is not going to release some vomit simulator? Do you seriously think you understand better?
http://www.polygon.com/2016/3/9/11174194/the-making-of-playstation-vr
>"I admit that Oculus have better VR"
This isn't even a discussion
>>53518350
>wanting to use a shitty vr where you physically move
>>53518698
Someday I want to try Mirror's Edge in VR with low FPS for the ultimate gut-churning experience.
>>53520282
Kekekekekkkekekeekek
>>53518185
It will be haxxed for your PCuck porn so you can watch a guys point of view getting a blowjob porn and then he will jizz on the camera, that's what you like.
who cares when you get this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hj9CMbyJ6q0
want to try vr
galaxy s6 + gear vr = 450 euro
cop / not cop ?
if not cop then where sould the money go?
no ps4 or good pc
>>53520486
bump
>>53518185
>only 400
What you don't mention is that it requires a PS camera (45$) and PS move controller (35$ each)
>>53520486
Thats a very good deal anon. Only problem is the s6 battery but I would take it.
>>53520486
I'm using the S7 Edge with VR and its glorious. The only thing i would say is the s7 would be better for clarity due to a higher pixel density.
>>53520264
>implying Sony is competent
Isn't the PS4 like the only profitable division? And the PS4 is only selling like crazy because it's better than the disaster that was the Xbone.
>>53518185
The only purpose the Sony VR will serve is killing off the Cuckulus Rift.
Normies will just buy a Sony VR.
Techies will just buy an HTC vive.
Rift no longer has a market.
Checkmate Facebook
>>53523604
>Normies will just buy a Sony VR.
No one will buy Morpheus since you're paying over $400 for shit quality VR. More if you don't have a PS4. What can PSVR offer normies that Samsung or LTG can't? Gran Tourismo? There's no market at all for what Sony is doing.
The Sony VR has Summer Lesson.
The others do not.
It's quite clear what is superior and what wins.
>>53518185
>looks cool on paper
>will be the blunder of the century
>>53523876
>it has some shitty anime story telling game where your only gameplay choices are to nod your head yes and no.
developed bei KOEI Tecmo, known for the same tekken rubbish for years
>>53518185
> 900-1080p
> 30fps
have fun faggot
>>53524229
Waifus best all.
>>53524290
you're gonna have all the uncensored waifus on the pc though.
waifus are literally pc exclusive
>>53523585
Their financial division is profitable.and imaging.
>>53518185
>literal 12 year old
mods
>>53518185
>mfw Playstation is a literal PC
>>53524229
it's bandai namco.
koei tecmo is dead or alive.
>>53519942
>>53519460
>>53519298
Sony dev guidelines apparently say that the minimum allowed framerate is 60fps and having a single frame rate drop below 55fps during testing and your game won't be allowed to be published on PSVR.
>>53520295
>Being a fat fuck.
>>53527104
Real vr is being skinny without muscle mass to move cause your on you bed/pod with an IV line playing games
>>53520302
Buy a PS4 and Sony VR then.
>>53527032
Brutal.
2010 graphics here we come.
>>53520486
>own Note Edge
>gear VR doesn't support it
>dont want to buy another phone just to try VR
>thinking of poormaning cardboard
>my life
>>53518367
You know, this reminds me of Betamax vs VHS. Betamax was a Sony standard that lost out to VHS because Sony didn't license people to use it for porn.
That's the future of playstation VR if uptight Sony execs aren't more lenient this time.
As someone who unfortunately works in sales, I can say without a doubt that this is going to be a huge success. The market is ready for VR, I get asked every day if the iPhone is compatible with GearVR, kek.
back to /v/ nigger
looks fun tbhwitcha
>>53523604
Idk man, I got to play with all the VR devices at PAX Prime last year and Rift and VIVE are pretty comparable.
Vive has amazing tech with the lighthouses where 3rd parties could take full advantage of the light that is emitted for tracking purposes.
Plus with that camera, AR is easier to pull off.
The Rift was SIGNIFICANTLY more comfortable to wear and is really light. Plus the Touch controllers just felt and worked better than the Vive wands with how theyre designed.
Vive relies on entirely 3rd party devs to create content while Rift has been subsidizing groups for a few years so Rift will have better out of the gate content.
Both systems are comparable with room scale VR with 15x15 for Vive and 12x12 for Rift. Then in 6 months, both groups said theyll be fully cross compatible with support.
It will be very interesting to see where things go with these two groups.
Im personally buying the Rift after experiencing the headset and controllers along with the game line up coming out first. Loved EVE and Luckys tale and looking forward to the F-Zero knock off.
The PSVR though? Super uncomfortable, choppy visuals, poor tracking, and Dk1.5 level screen quality. I really disliked using that device.
>>53518185
>>better experience, because it runs perfectly fine
http://www.gizmag.com/playstation-vr-review-hands-on-gdc/42321/
http://pastebin.com/6Bkm0f3R
It's not looking like that for everything. Sony has sub tier tracking it seems. Anything that wants fast movement is going to suck.
I'm only excited about VR for racing/flight sims and porn. For everything else, it just seems really meh.
>>53518185
>better experience, because it runs perfectly fine
[citation needed]
A ps4 running anything at 1080p 120hz when many games struggle to reach 30fps at 900p
All of my kek
>>53518185
'only' the price of a whole console.
for an accessory
great.
>>53518362
Clearly do not understand that this is not a video game board.
>Salty fag complains that he is told to fuck off to >>>v
>>53531337
Just wanted to thank you for the info. I've been inquiring everywhere on how comfortable these devices are to wear. For some reason, nobody seems to factor this in. My favorite headphones for watching movies is HD 558. Not because they have the best sound, but because they are the most comfortable to wear for an entire movie. Same reason I'm saving for the HD 700.
I'll still try the Vive (if I can find a demo somewhere), but now I guess I should try the Rift.
>>53527215
There's a night and day difference between Samsung Gear VR and Google Cardboard. There's a reason why they didn't include a headstrap with the Google Cardboard.
>>53532172
my nigga
>>53534256
>$800 GPU required for Vive and Oculus
>>53537374
>$300 GPU
ftfy
Remember that PS4 uses the equivalent of a $100 GPU. That should give you a clue as to the quality of PSVR.
>>53537773
>$300 GPU
who are you kidding?
>only at 1080p
>not even VR
>can't even high fps (which is required for VR)
>not even high res enough for VR
look up the prices of these GPUs
>>53537956
I used the 970 as an example since it's explicitly the minimum GPU recommended for VR. Also your benchmark is kinda pointless since RotTR is one of the most GPU-demanding games out right now (although performance has been improved with subsequent patched) Most VR games are cel-shaded for a reason, they usually aren't as graphically demanding to achieve 90fps.
>>53537998
PC can't into VR games unless the games have WiiU graphics
>>53535699
The hd700 sennheiser is shit, no one talks about it. And its often at a 20% discount on cdon.
>>53527032
>Sony dev guidelines apparently say that the minimum allowed framerate is 60fps and having a single frame rate drop below 55fps during testing and your game won't be allowed to be published on PSVR.
I wonder if any game devs will reach that standard without lowering the graphical quality dramatically. 55 fps minimum at 1920x1080 in modern games is really hard to achieve with the hardware the ps4 has, if I have understood correctly the performance of the ps4 is comparable to a pc with a decent processor and a gtx 750 or some similar gpu.
>>53518350
>video
>they're trying to push their failed tech again
>literally eyetoy-tier gameplay
2 0 0 3
0
0
3
>>53518350
Until we have holodeck floors, sitting is the best option you can drive a crane, drive a truck and of course: fly a plane from your seated position.
Sony should allow it's use with PCs and make their own service like Steam to compete on the platform and they could sew this up.
>>53518185
>only costs 400 bucks
No friend, like the console you pay for it in installments through a markup on all games.
>>53538038
I'm barely following this VR shit, but even I know of Eve Valkerie
>>53538460
>Eve Valkerie
yes, looks like shit
>>53538541
As compared to?
>>53518350
>roomscale
This is the real meme
NOBODY wants this
>>53538541
Not even, the visuals are way about any Wii game. You're probably confusing it with another game.
>>53519460
>That pretty much kills the purpose of VR
lol?
Presence isn't achieved through good graphics
This thread is a fucking shitshow
>>53538154
>if I have understood correctly the performance of the ps4 is comparable to a pc with a decent processor and a gtx 750 or some similar gpu.
An i3 and a 750ti surpasses both consoles. Considering how the ps4 cant sustain 60fps at 1080p and what >>53527032 said, either the graphics will look worse than the ps3 or the headset includes extra hardware(which is unlikely due to the price).
HMB2 cards will make VR great again.
>>53538614
>surpasses
Outperform*
>>53538587
it literally looks like a wiiu game
>>53538587
Shut up. Everyone loves Laser Quest. It's what VR was invented for.
Simulator games have the most to benefit from VR, such as Office Sex Simulator
>>53538614
My laptop has a gtx 860m gpu and an i7-4700HQ cpu (yes, it's a gaymen laptop) and I'd say the performance of the 860m is probably similar or a little better than the ps4. I can run BF4 on medium settings at 1080p at pretty much constant 60 fps, it only really drops in some really intensive explosion, and even then only for maybe 2-3 seconds. The cpu in this thing is probably a lot more powerful since the ps4's cpu has 8 weak cores if I remember correctly.
>>53538655
And ps4 vr is gonna look like nds games
What's your point
>>53518367
Thank you for reminding me to farm more Armsmasters in Disgaea PC.
>>53518499
Graphical downgrades. We're going to enter PSX territory to get that 120Hz.
Everybody is complaining how the PS3 doesn't have enough performance for virtual reality while PCs don't have the performance too.
>>53539186
>Everybody is complaining how the PS3 doesn't have enough performance for virtual reality while PCs don't have the performance too.
Huh? Name one VR game for pc that doesn't run on PC.
>>53539186
>Someone told me my car from 1963 might not hold up to current standards
>ha I bet his car from 2013 is't any better
>>53518185
>more VR games for sure
ARE
YOU
SERIOUS?
>>53539213
Do you think Sony will produce games that won't work on their VR system? Truth is that they will all have limited graphics to meet the requirements for VR. Consoles more than PCs but in the end it's the same problem though.
>>53539395
The requirements for VR for is an R9 290. That card is several years old, and can be easily over clocked.
>>53539506
The requirements for VR on PC are 2160x1200@90fps and not some random graphics card.
>>53539614
>>>53539506 (You)
>The requirements for VR on PC are 2160x1200@90fps and not some random graphics card.
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/oculus-rift-minumum-pc-spec-finalized/1100-6433566/
>>53539686
It mainly depends on the game if you can play it in VR or not.
But please have fun trying to play GTA5 or another recently released AAA game with your GTX970 in VR.
http://iq.intel.com/the-technical-challenges-of-virtual-reality/
>“If you are doing a simulation on a 2D monitor and you are bringing it to VR, you are going to up the performance requirements by a factor 1.4 to 2x,”
>Also consider that the specs that Oculus released are only the bare minimum requirements; some games will push the graphics even further, requiring PCs that scream.
>>53539914
PC games have graphics sliders. You can run AAA on Intel graphics cards at 60 fps
>>53539953
And it will look like shit.
>Players have to be able to see the hairs on a dog. Also, graphical tricks used in the past — like using flat 2D images to provide set dressing like grass — become obvious when viewing a 3D picture up close.
I stay with my point. You can't have enough power for virtual reality and neither consoles or PCs have what is needed right now. They will release games that are developed for VR systems that will try to work around those problems but don't think you will be able to enjoy the most recent releases in VR.
I couldn't underclock my gtx 570 to run as poorly as the ps4 runs
Have fun with your shit framerate and/or resolution and/or graphics quality and being locked to proprietary hardware with 0 free software released from devs
>>53540094
Except people who are using VR right now say it's amazing.
Your standards for VR are arbitrary. It's like someone who says they don't think games will be realistic until they can simulate fluid at the atomic level.
>>53523784
You forgot that real normies don't have gaymen PCs. They just have playstations and xboxen.
PC gamers are already a minority.
>>53531337
>The PSVR though? Super uncomfortable, choppy visuals, poor tracking, and Dk1.5 level screen quality. I really disliked using that device.
You're implying normies care about this.
Reminder, normies are people who play their games at 720p30 on low graphical settings and genuinely think it looks amazing.
This is the audience the PSVR is targeting: People who are already dumb enough to play games using consoles.
PC users who are not Facebook drones will almost surely get the Vive.
>>53520302
Mirror's Edge runs fine on my GTX 670. It's not exactly a demanding game.
It's also one of my favorite games.
>OSVR is $300
Ok kid.
>>53541040
>60 Hz
Keep your barf bag ready
>>53518185
What the hell does this have to do with /g/
>>53541115
VR headsets are technology
>>53541090
Can't you swap out the display for a new one on OSVR though? Seems a much better idea than being forced to upgrade to a new €700 HMD every other year.
>>53541115
>VR is only good for videogames
I'm guessing you haven't tried JauntVR, YouTube 360, or VR Chat yet?
>>53541659
>VR is only good for videogames
And porn.
I wonder if we will ever see VR live-action movies. Like, imagine a movie where you can literally see the action in 360° around you. It would be like IMAX but better and for your home.
>>53518185
>caring about VR and vidya
>in 2000 fucking 16
The only good thing about Morpheus is that it shows how much idiots overpay for Rift and that Valve shit.
>>53538574
To be honest when I'm paying more than 600Euros for something I would expect to be able to move with my headset. I would use this feature maybe once or twice but I would sleep better knowing I have it.
>>53518185
I know the virtualboy wasn't that good, but this VR shit from sony is going to end up the same way.
Until we get to the point where we can be in a room and interact with virtual objects with the walls creating a seamless virtual world without special helmets, this is all hype for the average consumer and a poor $ making scheme that screams desperation on behalf of sony's stock.
>>53538154
Phantom Pain looked pretty good and ran at 1080p 60fps on PS4.
Digital foundry basically said it almost never dips below 60.
I'm just waiting until we can play mmorpgs in a virtual world like sword art online
Also the only vr porn I want to see is hentai because real people disgust me
>>53542117
>that
>good
it looks like something straight out of 2005, with all the flat textures, bad LoD, low resolution trees, ridiculously short foliage clipping and virtually no lighting effects.
Go compare it to even something older like maxed out Metro 2033 at 4K.
>>53541791
Nah, it'll probably stay as short films, news pieces, and promotional bits for a while. Directing a feature length 360° movie would be a pain in the neck, and too much of an exercise to watch. I can see 3d video becoming more popular again though, since it's such a piece of piss to pull off in VR.
>>53518458
wew lad you sure showed them can't argue with that lmao
>Awful graphics
>Awful, unstable frame rate
>Console games, so casualised
>Weak
>Hands down THE worst headset
>Even admitted by sonys CEO
>Not realising that Sony doesn't actually care about VR because they know they can't keep up
>Not realising that Sony is only doing this so they don't look bad
>Not realising you're being played
>Not realising Consoles are the weakest in EVERY regard.
>Not realising this is just a troll thread anyway.
Get rekt
IHS Technology’s Director of Games Piers Harding-Rollspredicts that, even with the October launch, PlayStation VR will dominate the market share with 64% of the installed base in 2016 (that’s not counting mobile VR, obviously), translating in 1.6 million units sold. This is consistent withour previous report from SuperData Research, which suggested sales of approximately 1.9 units at a time when PlayStation VR was still pinned for a launch in the first half of the year, though their estimate on market share is drastically different.
That’s mainly because Harding-Rolls estimates that PlayStation 4 will have a much bigger addressable market this year than the Oculus Rift and HTC Vive.
With a forecast installed base of 53m PS4s by the end of 2016, Sony has a much bigger addressable market of ‘ready-to-go’ consumers to address than PC-based solutions. In contrast, IHS forecasts that 17m consumers will addressable by Oculus Rift and HTC Vive by the end of 2016.
He also believes that Sony’s experience with the PlayStation platform will help them create quality content for PlayStation VR.
Sony has confirmed that over 230 developers are working on the PlayStation VR platform. Sony’s existing in-house expertise and third-party relationships means it is well positioned to build a strong body of content for launch of the platform.
Sony’s walled garden approach to the PS4 platform means it is well placed to provide a better controlled and consistent VR experience to consumers. This will be important in driving adoption and positive word of mouth for PlayStation VR.
http://wccftech.com/playstation-vr-64-market-share-2016-16m-units-sold-analyst/
>>53542117
Meanwhile on the PC
How do PS4 owners sleep at night?
144 posts and this shit hasn't been deleted, thanks mods
>>53542755
Lol you mad psvr is better
Go back to your huge towers
>>53542395
Nah, some big Director will do it at least once just for the credo, to be that guy who actually pulled it off.
>>53542779
How is that meant to be an insult? Aren't you embarrassed at how cramped and poorly cooled consoles are? You'd think you got the message after that Xbox 360 failure rate.
>>53518185
I'm pretty excited for it but that response time has me worried.
>>53542871
At least I don't have to upgrade every 6 months for a new gt980 whatever
HIDE VIRTUAL JEWISH REALITY SHILLS
SAGE JEWISH VIRTUAL REALITY THREADS
REPORT VIRTUAL RABBI IRREALITY
Yeah, yeah. VR needs extremely high framerates and extremely low latency just to be USABLE, let alone to be enjoyable. A Playstation can provide neither. The games will either cause severe motion sickness or will look like they're from 2009.
>>53520486
Cop, great for porn
>>53518185
Please keep your low DPI.
>>53542651
>PlayStation VR will dominate the market share with 64% of the installed base in 2016
So? The vast majority of people are retarded, so it is not at all surprising they they would buy consoles. Consoles are a huge market because normies are too stupid to do thirty minutes of reading and build a PC.
Console VR is going to suck, just like console everything sucks. It will be successful, but that does not make it good.
>>53543075
*insert anything* sucks
Are you fucking serious, are you still in high school, holy shit take a debate class
>>53543075
Console is huge market because PCs are pretty expensive outside USA. If I had to decide between 300Eur PS4 and building equivalent PC, which would cost me at least 100 more, for my wife's son I would buy PS4 without hestitation.
>decent graphics cards are about $800
>2 ps4s
>cheaper
And here we have the typical basement dwelling neckbeard. PC is better in the long run but there are far easier ways to play a game.
I am getting a Rift come March 28th, but now I am worried about performance since the Pascal cards wont be out till mid year.
After doing the tests with 3Dmark and SteamVR, I dont even know if I will be fine with what I have.
Anyone else gonna try running a vr headset underspec at first?
>>53518185
> less than 100 degree FOV
> AMD APU tier performance
>better experience
Top kek
>>53544673
You're also forgetting,
>1080p,60hz panel
>LCD display instead of OLED
>>53542324
I get the feeling you were not conscious in 2005
>>53542117
And with VR, now you have to render it twice, not once, while maintaining the syncing integrity. It ain't gonna be great looking games for now
>>53542928
>brags he doesn't have to upgrade to keep up with tech
>buys a $400 headset
>expands his ps4 hard drive
>buys a 4K TV
K
>>53545434
Only the old Morpheus prototype used LCD and it was always 120hz
>>53545496
I'm being serious. Crysis, which came out in 2007, looks better than that garbage.
>>53542117
literally mw1 with bloom
>>53542928
>he goes to /g/ to tell people he doesn't know what a single graphics card is called
>>53541979
>Moving with a cable attached to your head with no vision of the outside world
I give HTC 3 weeks before someone sues them for tripping over the cable
>>53527215
You can buy Chinese headsets that are $20-30 on Aliexpress.
>>53518185
But OP how will I give a fuck when I'm using my room scale VR with my Vive on April 5th and before that I'll be using the Rift for it's superior optical clarity and ergonomics for sim racing and Elite: Dangerous on the 28th.
Poor plebs. Enjoy your run-along-and-PlayStation VR kiddies. You can't even run porn on it.
You can't even run porn on it
o
u
c
a
n
'
t
e
v
e
n
r
u
n
p
o
r
n
o
n
i
t
Normies {x} Cucked { } Not Cucked
This is a /v/ thread
>>53542670
Probably on a pile of $800 saved at the bank.
>true VR finally arrives, one of the fantasy techs of Scifi
>/g/ complains about it not being perfect on the first iteration despite everyone who's used it claiming its filly immersive
When sex bots finally arrive, you faggots will bitch that the vaginas feels like an 18 year old instead of a 12 year old virgin like in your animes.
>>53550176
>yfw you realize the jew values cash more than entertainment
Do you derive sexual pleasure from frugality?
>>53550176
>take PC you already have
>add $250 gaymen card
>???
>graphics
>>53550469
that implies they bought anything other than a laptop, or a comp that could handle a dedicated gpu
it's closer to
>take PC you already have
>don't wash hands
>add $900 ricer gaymen card
>overload psu, fry motherboard
>shitpost on /g/ about pc vs console to calm themselves down after their utter failure
>>53542117
All those distance trees just look like blobs.
>>53518185
>more VR games for sure
On a console? Are you fucking joking?
>better VR games for sure too, because there is only 1 hardware to adapt for
No. Dev here, going from rift to vive or vice versa is trivial. Adapting shit to or from the morph is a fucking pain. Not to mention getting shit running smoothly on a console can be utterly fucky for dev inexperienced in optimising stuff. Translation: You're gonna see a lot of shitty fucking games that wouldn't be so shit with pc hardware.
>better experience, because it runs perfectly fine
Nuigga no. The only console I could actually trust in this generation for smooth VR is the wii fucking u.
Splatoon runs beautifully at true 1080p 60fps, unlike the others which run upscaled and struggle at 30fps.
Sure, the others are more powerful, but so long as nintendo are the only ones that care about proper coding, it's staying the same.
>But what if sony devs started using nintendo tier code??? That'd fix everything, r-right?!?!?
No, Fuck you.
If we lived in that world the xbone would be running the latest cod at 4k 90fps, but that's not the fucking world we live in, is it?
You think VR's gonna change that?
It'd be nice if it where a $400 headset with the raw specs of the vive or rift, but even that's not gonna happen.
Lock it to a console and it's even more fucked.
That box that sits between it and the PS4 looks like a certified shitfucker.
Prove me wrong, it'd love it to be a great little system, but right now you might as well be banging on about blast processing.
>>53550580
>That box that sits between it and the PS4 looks like a certified shitfucker.
And it genuinely is what it looks like! All it does is handle audio and send the TV an unwarped picture.
The best part is, they want to tell us that there'll be a game for bystanders to play while you're in the headset, meaning the PS4 will, without any help, have to render 3 pictures instead of 2. Maybe even 4 or more, if they want split-screen within that!
[spoiler]Is your studio hiring? I'm graduating in June and I'm only doing VR-based projects until then.[/spoiler]
>>53540242
It runs fine on my m4640 HD , it's pretty much gonna run fine on anything
>there are people on /g/ whose lives suck so badly they wan't VR to forget about how much they are losers
sad to think about desu
>>53523585
stop asking dumb questions, retard
>>53550580
>Splatoon runs beautifully at true 1080p 60fps
you just destroyed your credibility
>>53551592
>wan't
When we have 1080p on each eye VR will have peripheral vision as good as the meat space.
>>53518350
>meanwhile on the Rift/Vive
>pcucks will defend spending >$2k on new hardware and headsets for waggle-tier gaming periphrals
>>53550936
>Is your studio hiring?
I wish I worked for a fucking studio, right now it's just me, my programming and modelling skills, and a bunch of voicefag femanons from /b/.
>>53551685
It does. It's not fucking cell shaded, it's not upscaled, it can actually pump 120 million unique pixels per second. No other console today does that, which is a fucking tragedy given the other consoles have so much more power behind them.
They could, I bet if you asked big N to make a game for the PS4 it's run at 1080p 60fps with 16xAA piece of cake, or 4k 120fps with the only sacrifice being AA.
It's not that nintendo is good, everyone else is just so utterly fucking horrible.
