Well then, seems like nvidia is fucked in this market.
http://wccftech.com/amd-captures-83-vr-market-leading-vr-sector/'
>inb4 WCCF poo in loo clickbait
>>53497114
I had 3000$ to invest back when the stock was at 1$ a piece...it's doubled and now I have nothing because I'm reject who can't make his own decisions and listened to his mother's "it's a gamble" speech.
>turn on VR headset
>your face catches on fire
Bravo AMD.
>>53497143
Of course stocks are a gamble. I bought $2000 worth of Tesla stocks when they were about $33/share. If I didn't sell it back then I'd have over $13k right now.
>>53497143
you have 3000...
why you investing with so little money anyways?
>>53497148
>>53497143
No, you did the right thing. Tech stocks are terrible investments.
haha how the fuck do they own 83% of the $800 USD VR market when their primary demographic are people who can only afford $300 GPUs
fucking currytech shitposting get the fuck out of here rajeev
>>53497114
>VR Market
So basically nothing.
>>53497214
well some how they managed to get $83 of the market becuase nvidia doesn't care about vr
>>53497249
nigga nvidia is right in the womb of the vr market RIGHT NOW cooking up some delicious gameworks vr titles for amd gpus to run.
>>53497275
>gaemwerks
>>53497194
>>53497295
https://youtu.be/F9y-8IzNpQ4
They're bringing faceworks to vr. The video above was posted in 2014.
>>53497365
Nvidia has shit latency so they by default cant to VR and their lack of async support is not helping at all.
>>53497143
and just how much do you think VR matters to AMD's bottom line right now ?
Probably as much as an accounting error.
AMD has shit margins because they need to sell their products (outside of video cards) for so little because otherwise no one would buy them.
AMD stock isn't going anywhere like some floating turd left in the toilet.
>>53497394
Wow I didn't know that you should email them so they can halt development on their gameworks project.
>>53497412
AMD is more like that tiny shit spot caused by the impact of the shit. Flushing it won't get it to move and you have to blast it with piss.
>>53497412
No, you're absolutely right but if their stock is on the rise and I doubt VR is gonna be bad for them.
>>53497190
>Seed money
Came into a small amount of money that happened to be 3k but it would have flipped to 6k.
>>53497114
>being a fanboy
>any year
Aren't you happy that technology is advancing? Or you're worried about losing your job with NVidia Shill Team™?
>>53497143
>investing in individual stocks
>not investing in mutual funds
>>53497506
dont hate the shill bux :^)
>>53497394
AMD is the one with shit frame latency
>>53497473
if you follow news stories about AMD stock you will see how there have been lots of articles in the past about how AMD will soar!
https://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AAMD&fstype=ii&ei=CKTnVtHcENf3jAHklKf4DA
Their revenue is declining too
it seems like its only a matter of time before they go bankrupt/get bought out
>>53497114
>>53497576
AMD has better motion to photon latency which is why it's the popular choice for VR now. Nvidia will probably improve it for Pascal, if they're smart.
>>53497544
>using the smiley with a carat nose
WHEN YOU WERE WHEN AMD WON
Eh. I'll be upgrading to nvidia before my Vive comes in. After poolaris I'm guessing I won't be the only one
>>53498010
Why would you go to Nvidia? Maxwell is terrible for VR. At least wait for Pascal.
>>53498010
>poolaris
You're using in b4 wrong.
If you say, make a thread going
2+2 = ?
Then go 'in b4 4'
You're still retarded
In b4 is to predict things that AREN'T the correct answer
>>53498124
guys, the meme police are here.
>>53498151
It's more about wccf really being poo in loo dumb clickbait
>>53497201
how are tech stocks the worst? they're medium risk with huge dividend ratios usually. they grow fast.
Nvidia has 80% marketshare
AMD claims 83% VR marketshare
Yeah, AMD is a lying piece of shit
>>53497576
>NOOOOOOOOOO U the post
kys nvidiot
>>53498661
VR is different from GPU market share smart one
>>53497275
As a VR dev, on the technical side, there is nothing more repulsive than the thought of a gameworks VR game.
They need to stop this stupid irrelevant bullshit and actually make decent GPU's. For VR, what they have is abysmal.
>>53497720
>if they're smart.
They'll release a card that has a 3 frame delay on the video buffer, I fucking guarantee it.
And reviewers won't notice a thing because fraps says it's hitting 60fps.
>>53500880
Not that it even matters, gameworks VR will crash and burn since AMD is already entrenched in that market.
>>53500909
They will notice when they get motion sickness from the shit latency.
>>53498661
Nvidia has PC discrete gpu market share
Stop being a retard. Discrete GPU is not VR.
>>53500943
It's a feature. It increases your involvement.
http://www.computerbase.de/2016-03/systemanforderungen-vr-spiele-benchmarks/
Nvidia destroys AMD in VR, AMD can't compete at all
Gameworks VR is the real deal, LiquidVR is nothing but meme
>>53501074
>german
shouldnt you be getting cucked by muslims or something
>in this market
The market you are speaking of, is vastly smaller than the gaming console market.
AMD has a monopoly on the gaming console market.
AMD had a fourth quarter net loss of $102 million in 2015 despite having a monopoly on the gaming console market, and it's still losing today.
Think about this for a moment.
>>53501161
Folks will pay $400-$500 for a console with an AMD chip, but I imagine those margins are garbage. It's not like AMD made the whole shebang, so they see a tiny fraction of that device that barely makes a profit anyway.
I'd argue the real money in the console market is from the ecosystem -- you may spend $500 on a Xbox One, but you're also going to spend up to $60 for each game, and probably spend $5 a month on an Xbox Live sub.
Now imagine that your name is Nvidia and companies spend $2500-$5000 per card to run CUDA-accelerated workflows (because you've invested heavily in this space). The largest CUDA card deployment I can find is Oak Ridge, which has 18,688 K20s -- assuming $2500 a card, that's $46 million.
Nvidia has made money /not/ by being cheaper, but being better -- and not necessarily with hardware. Nvidia's developer docs are fucking amazing, whereas AMD's are kind of light. That being said, AMD doesn't own OpenCL (that's a Khronos group thing) like Nvidia owns CUDA, so the ball isn't entirely in their court.
TL;DR: AMD has built a business over being the cheaper solution, if not necessarily the better one. I'd love to see that change in a long-term way, but I don't know if that's going to happen.
>>53502350
No way it is gonna happen.
Intel and Nvidia control the market, and I am pretty sure if they wanted, they could kill off AMD at any time.
>>53497148
>House fire meme
daily reminder about the Fermi Origin
>>53502572
they can't because antitrust laws are a thing
>>53497596
>3 Reasons Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Stock Could Rise
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/03/08/3-reasons-advanced-micro-devices-inc-stock-could-r.aspx
>>53503214
March 2015
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/03/02/3-reasons-advanced-micro-devices-inc-stock-could-2.aspx
http://seekingalpha.com/article/2976736-10-reasons-why-amd-will-be-10-by-2017
http://www.bidnessetc.com/36746-6-reasons-to-buy-advanced-micro-devices-inc-amd-stock-in-2015/
July 2015
http://iknowfirst.com/inevitable-rebound-for-amd
Not sure why so many articles came out in march about AMD, maybe earnings reports around that time ?
Anyways, you see, given enough people you will invariably find people who tell you AMD is going up and to buy, and of couse people that will say to stay away from AMD.
>but of course you will see more articles telling you what to buy rather than what not to buy
>>53497275
Tessellation won't be a problem on Polaris so whatever.
>>53497114
>vr market
>>53497114
Indians won once again
>>53497114
>Indian clickbait
Beat it Panjeet.
