Is this the cheapest/best option for a 27 inch/144hz/IPS/<5ms monitor?
I'm not an AMD fag so the freesync means nothing to me.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236466
>144hz <5 ms
>IPS
Choose one
If you're not an AMD poorfaggot, you should get a G-Sync™ display in order to play the way it's meant to be played.
>>53437117
you could save 100 bucks and get all those features + 4k resolution if you'd give up 144hz.
just saiyan.
>>53437512
OP obviously wants to play gaymes, or he wouldn't be going for 144Hz.
OP needs to fuck off back to >>>/v/
>>53437546
144hz is nice for ui too, anon
>>53437593
I'd rather have more screen real estate for productivity than muh smooth animations 144Hz.
Shit anon, that makes me question this choice for a price that close.
http://www.amazon.com/Dell-UltraSharp-27-Inch-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B00P0EQD1Q
Hell, even 4K 27 monitors are that same price..... Fuck.
>>53437512
1440p is hard enough for games. 4k is just no-no if want to play with some framerates :/
>>53437117
I have PG279Q but if you want to go cheap buy the MG279Q. Basically same without g-sync (which is nice but not worth the price difference).
>>53437737
That is 1440p
>>53437799
Is it good for the price? I'm planning on getting a large monitor for design work, that is all.
/g/ is not for shopping advice you idiot
buy a rope and hang yourself instead
or go to >>>/wsr/
>>53437619
maybe that's why he want's both then
OP here
Yeah this is for geymen, 4k is still too far down the road to be viable with the current video card technologies
>>53438060
>gaymen
Well go back to /v/ then
>>53438258
>Well go back to /v/ then
No one's said this on /g/, ever.