muh bose
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
I'm close to buying a Bose Soundlink Mini II because its too hot to wear headphones and earbuds get annoying after too long. Talk me out of this /g/. I have roommates and they dont want to hear it loud or hear it at all probably idk
>>53418926
>Talk me out of this /g/.
end your life OP
but read the sticky before
Look into a Sony op, it's cheaper and just as good if not better
>>53418957
this is technology mate. Shitpost somewhere else like /b/
But why aren't you just getting speakers
>200 fucking dollars for a speaker
Put down the credit card and walk away.
>>53418969
thanks, not OP but looking for good substitute
>>53419088
the bass is so heavy on it though. Have you even heard it? Its lush
>>53418926
Sound not bad/price kinda bad. Overall if you got extra money and would use it often go for it.
>Bose
Try this instead. Much better sound quality.
1. the unit is overpriced by about 100%
2. you can actually buy pretty good standard speakers for $200
3. the unit has a history of 16% failure just after the 1 year warranty is over
4. there are compatible units (by Phillips) that sound as good but are in the $40 to $88 range
5. the bass is synthesized and thin
6. the midrange is shitty
7. the treble is sibilant and grainy
8. it's bose
Philips BT3500B/37 Wireless Portable Bluetooth Speaker
$48.09
>>53419931
why not the bt2500? who needs to spend an extra $20 on NFC bluetooth paring?
I got it OP, I am serious buy it. My brother has a JBL Charge 2 plus and it doesn't come near the performance of the Bose. Only nice thing is that the JBL can charge other devices and has a huge battery.
But the soundlink mini 2 is definitely the best of its kind.
>>53418926
My father has one. Not sure if I'd get it myself, but it's pretty good.
What are you looking for in a speaker OP? Bluetooth, portability, sound quality?
>>53419931
>just get something mediocre and cheap instead
Saying >its bose makes you look like a retard btw, have you actually ever heard bose speakers? they make good shit
>>53420366
What sets it apart? The SQ? Size?
>>53420308
>mono vs stereo
are u really that dumb
>>53420768
what are you saying breh? Shits mono?
>>53418926
Those things sound like trash. For the money get a Sonos
>>53418926
Buy actual speakers, you fucking retard
Are you constantly moving your mobilefag setup to different rooms? No? Then get quality wired speakers or headphones. Bluetooth can never compete with wired.
>>53420538
Apparently you never heard good speakers before
Remember that saying? "no highs no lows, must be bose"
>>53420308
You can easily sound-comparison Bose and Phillips and other BT speakers at Target.
Not going to get into this fray other than to say the best is not the most expensive.
