What did he mean by this?
ANDROID BTFO
what a retard
>>53418916
He means if you are a dumb pedo, android might not be secure enough
>>53418939
exactly.
>>53418939
actually, android is quite BTFO by iOS in terms of objective security, you can't really deny this
>>53418939
>>53419025
>apple will still happily hand over any icloud backups
At least you can install a new rom on your android phone
>Implying Apple hasn't been forced to backdoor iOS and sworn to secrecy under the threat of violating muh nashunul segurahtee.
>>53418916
>if apple says it's secure, it HAS to be true!
At least Google doesn't attempt to hide it, lol.
>>53418916
That he is retarted because he has never heard of the black phone.
>>53418916
I might be wrong but I think he meant "I'm a retard who doesn't know anything about security and eats up whatever bullshit apple's marketing team says"
goto fail;
goto fail;
>>53418916
Didn't Apple hand over information to the Chinese?
Pretty sure almost all of tech twitter is just "muh emotions r right n ur wrong"
>>53419192
>>53419217
> butthurt lagdroid users
>>53419239
>waaah I regret spending my entire life savings on a shiny brick that can't even keep my information safe so I'll justify my purchase by shitposting on a korean slideshow imageboard
>>53419239
Prove that Apple doesn't provide data to the NSA. And no, a link to a statement from Apple saying that they don't isn't valid proof. Also: the fappening.
Also wasn't apple part of the PRISM data collection?
Reminder that Apple has been been shoving DRM in your throat yet it cares about backdoors.
Apple is also disgraced by Richard Stallman.
>>53419265
>korean slideshow imageboard
Reddit confirmed
>>53418916
That he is a tool.
>>53419271
Uhhh..how you say, si.
>>53419303
I tried telling this to my friend and he tried to rationalize it by saying they only gave them datacenter data? Like how can people do mental gymnastics this hard
>>53419300
>Ultra-butthurt swift subject change
Dumb/naive question but how do you know which platform is objectively more secure? How do you even 'assess' how secure a platform is? srs question
>you're able to encrypt your android in you settings without any companies having control over it
>mfw apple controls your phone's security
>>53419441
>using a botnet phone
>>53419441
Isn't this the phone Obama was giving out to the underprivileged inner city folk?
>>53419418
>Apple has encryption turned on by default
>Android hides encryption by default because it makes an already laggy OS slower on read/write
>>53419517
>android is a universal os
>disabled because some phones will not preform well encrypted
>android encryption runs well on flagship phones
>>53419404
If it's open source, it's able to be tried and tested. otherwise, you just have to take their word for it.
>>53419587
Oh okay, thanks
>>53419517
>Android hides encryption by default
But that's wrong
>>53420769
Why did you bump this shit thread?
