http://www.asus.com/Graphics-Cards/MINI-GTX950-2G/overview/
>Power Consumption up to 75W, no additional PCIe power required
IT'S HAPPENING
>WAH, WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO ON THE MOTHERBOARD?
p-put it inside of a full tower....
>making a 950 even shittier
still interesting though
>950
yawn
>>53393948
The card is clocked higher than the base clocks on GTX 950 on geforce.com
If you don't know shit & are an ignorant faggot, don't comment
>>53393907
Its going to get replaced soon by the GTX 950SE soon anyway.
Also its good to see the GTX 750Ti replaced, it was about time.
GTX should have been PCIe only since day 1.
>>53394391
>GTX should
GTX 950 should*
>>53393907
>2GB
>>53393907
What's the point of these graphics cards when few mini-ITX cases limit you to such a small graphics card? What's the point in getting a graphics card like that when you can't really get a smaller case to take advantage of it?
Also, fuck you OP. Your post reminded me of this and now it's stuck in my head:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bHimOJb-Xw
I want some benchmarks.
>>53394912
Its a weak 960 but way more strong than a GTX 750Ti.
>>53393921
like rolling a hotdog down a hallway
>>53393921
Kek
>>53395240
>>53393907
Is the Nano bigger?
>>53395737
They also made a 970 version in the same size.
The heat sink is a little bigger under the cover.
https://www.asus.com/Graphics-Cards/GTX970DCMOC4GD5/
>>53395791
>http://www.asus.com/Graphics-Cards/MINI-GTX950-2G/overview/
uguu~
So whats the big deal with the 950 being small
Its literally the 1/3 power of the Fury nano (or less)
>>53393907
>>53395791
Thanks, Rajesh.
Why is this obvious shilling allowed?
>>53395924
>Its literally the 1/3 power of the Fury nano (or less)
It's probably also priced accordingly.
