What's the best icon pack and why is it Voxel?
technology
>>53145295
>long shadows
>>53145437
>circles
gay
>>53145460
>breasts
>nipples
COCK
T A N G O
A
N
G
O
>People that don't use moonshine
Min you faggots.
>>53145295
>flat
>disgusting shadows
These should never mix.
>>53145295
>voxel
Strange way to write numix
>>53145762
>People that post anime on an anonymous imageboard.
pedophile
>>53145934
/thread
>>53145935
/board
>Designer creates a joke concept for "long shadow design" to make fun of modern web developers
>Modern web developers unironically love it and start using it everywhere
I use Flatro but I also like Umbra.
Anyone know a pack like the OP but without shadows?
>>53145437
If only it had more icons
Flat with long shadows is literally the most cancerous design style since skeuomorphic died.
I think it just annoys me so much because shadows on a flat icon doesn't make sense, and yes I also dislike Google's material style, though not as much.
>>53145295
>>53146373
>>53145295
>postulating an initial open ended question then changing the question to one that seeks validation for your own opinionated answer to the initial question disregarding that the initial question is open ended and has no definitive correct answer
>>53146427
That's a good picture depicting what it is going for. However, it still seems silly to me because no such things exist normally IRL so it is strange to see a representation of it in my interfaces.
>>53146479
>shadows aren't exist
What are those icons for? I thought you just needed the standard file icons for Thunar
>>53146453
Welcome to 4chan
>>53146515
I mean objects where the text/label sticks 10ft out like in the .gif
>flat
>casting a shadow
How?
>>53146479
I posted it to reaffirm how silly it is.
>>53146574
Oh, okay thanks for the reassurance, now my autism can finally go to rest.
I've been trying to find a simple B&W or grey scale icon pack that doesn't look like complete shit. The most decent I've found are the Token icons, but I still don't even like them very much.
I know colorless isn't exactly popular here, but does anyone have any suggestions?
>>53146561
>what are signs, billboards, banners, marquees, balloons, tombstones, canopies, etc.
>>53146713
>>53146561
Real physical buttons with raised and inset text are pretty common actually, that's what these things are intended to imitate.
>>53146561
>>53146794
raised/inset designs*
It's not limited to text obviously.
Brand icons are almost always raised and large on some kind of flat background. A lot of markets do this with text in the US, lots of
( MY STORE NAME )
looking things.
Clix
>>53146794
Yeah, but to get the length of shadow that long shadow design wants, the inset text has to be ludicrously tall.
>>53146861
>>53146839
I mean it would depend on the light source, no? A low angle light would make sense for these buttons but may be uncommon for real buttons simply because of the way they're placed and oriented, buttons designed for phones and the like may be designed with the angle at which you view them in mind.
In reality I don't actually know, that's just my assumption on it, I think it looks stupid most of the time.
I also can't find a good image to show what I'm talking about, so not really related image.
>>53146899
Long shadow design wants shadows 2.5 times the size of the object. If you have a light source low enough to cause that, then that in itself is retarded design.
>>53146950
I think that's why some people dislike it, it's really bad either way. Being digital they have some creative liberty though, they're not and shouldn't be bound to simply imitating real objects imo, I say that even if I dislike this particular type most of the time.
>>53145295
Fucking meme shadows
You're triggering my /gd/
What about click ui
>>53146675
Flight dark
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.natewren.darkflight
They aren't free though. I know that's a problem for some.
>>53145762
This
>>53146675
B&W icons start to look so annoying after you've had them for a while, no matter how great they looked initially.
>>53145295
Those shadows look stupid and ugly as hell.
>>53146675
Iceglass.
Not sure if they're available for mobile, though.
>>53150215
>tfw I've bought 3 iconpacks from that guy.
Flight, flight dark, and piptec are pretty much the same pack just in different colors, but muh ricing.
>>53145295
Because it looks like windows tiles
quadro
>>53145295
>icon pack
why?
