Monitor Thread
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
which are the best?
which do you have?
which are you planning on buying next?
>1080p 144 Hz tn
>1440p 144 Hz tn
>4k 60 Hz tn
>1080p 60 Hz ips
>1440p 60 Hz ips
>4k 60 Hz ips (richfags pls go)
>which are you planning on buying next?
>1200p 60 Hz ips
Dell U2415
>>52991130
>tfw the world isn't ready for 4k yet but my body is
What's the best Korean monitor? Has /g/ any kind of consensus?
>>52991184
seriously I would probably decline cheap 4k in favor of just regular resolution because of the headache it would cause with linux DEs tryin to deal with quirks of 4k
then windows games needing massive performance GPUs to get comfy FPS
seriously I was working on HD notebook and the fucking windows 10 had blured fonts and mistakes all over because theres zero readiness for high resolution displays
My old 1080p 60Hz monitor died last week so I got an Asus MG278Q
>1440p 144Hz TN
>27"
>DP, 2xHDMI, DVI
>Supports Freesync 40Hz to 144Hz (the IPS version only goes up to 90Hz)
>>52991263
how do you like it? is 144Hz really that noticable?
are ultrawides a meme or do they actually service a useful purpose?
>>52991240
Sounds like you need OS X
>>52991298
It's a good novelty, suddenly you can move windows around or move the camera on games with little to no motion blur and ghosting which is really pleasing to the eye. Still can't try freesync because I'm on a 280x but I'm planning to upgrade to the new AMD line later this year. Anyway higher framerates and refresh rates on games are really cool in general.
Also, on 1440p you can have two windows side by side or even 4 in a mosaic without barely losing a single bit of info because everything is designed for the 768p potato resolution.
>>52991379
if you work in photoshop, autocad they serve same purpose as dual monitors
heard they have terrible issues with uniformity and backbleed though
>>52991379
they just give you more space. if you don't want one for gaming, a second monitor on the side will always serve you better.
42" 4K @ 166Hz
Man, 2023... What a year to be alive.
>>52991130
LG 27MU67 4k IPS
not even expensive so I don't know what you're saying about rich fag
>>52991485
I didn't know you can get them so cheap already
sh-should I do it?
>>52991557
it was $400 and its an amazing monitor, great colours, 60hz, free sync
>tfw 1440p 144hz ips
I don't think they exist, but: are there any 1200p (not 1080p) monitors above 60hz? I remember looking a few years ago and finding none. I don't really want to make the jump to 1440p and all the added costs that go along with getting a better card and all that
Does anyone know of a really short monitor for portrait mode? I have limited space on my desk.
>>52991614
it's 524€ here. eurocucked again.
>>52991130
I've got an Acer XG270HU (2560x1440@144hz TN) and I love it.
144hz DOES make a noticeable difference over 60 though the difference between 120->144 isn't much at all. It DOES increase fluidity, but its not a massive jump like 60->120 was. (Though I went straight to 144 myself).
If you have a 60hz monitor, its worth getting 144 since its becoming a standard now. If you have 120hz, its not worth getting a new monitor for.
144hz TN does me just fine. 2560x1440 is also the best resolution for RIGHT NOW because 4k cannot into above 60hz and even without that, unless you go multi-GPU, you won't even get 60 in games - not if you want the eye candy. There's literally no point in turning down graphical settings just to achieve a higher framerate @ 4k since 4k is ALL about higher fidelity.
>>52991298
With 144hz web browsing feels about as smooth as reading a physical newspaper (actually made me like Firefox's smooth scrolling feature). I'm glad I switched from my previous monitor (Samsung U28D590D).
any decent 1440p under 26 inches?
right now looking at:
Asus VH24AH
Acer G247HYU
anything else i should consider?
>>52991130
I have three monitors and a TV. Two IPS, one TN, and I don't know what the TV is, have to check.
I'd love to have a monitor that's at least 1440p, has high refresh rate, and packs *sync preferably freesync so I can leave Nvidia. The panel can be IPS, VA, etc. though I'd love to have an OLED monitor, but it's not going to be affordable on the next 5 years.
1080/1440p 144hz tn
I'm using a 4K at work and Windows scaling is pretty abortive. Next res will be 1440p @ 144Hz when the prices drop, fuck paying £700 for a single monitor.
>>52991956
U2515
one 1680x1050 (M2094D) and the second one is some 1280x1024 neovo
24" 3840x2160
22" 1920x1080
19" 1280x1024
At some point I'll probably get another 24" 4k to replace the 1080p monitor, which in turn will replace the smallest monitor.
I'm a poorfag. I picked up a 21.5 inch 1080p IPS monitor for only $100. It's fairly nice but it only has one VGA and one HDMI
>>52991263
The next PC I build will probably have a 390 in it so I'm trying to decide between that monitor or a freesync ultrawide. I like the size/immersion factor of the ultrawide but it's only 75hz and costs a fuckload more than the MG278Q, also there's the issue of 21:9 support for things as well. I guess I'd have to see them in person to make a good decision about them.
>>52991263
I was looking at that one too, and the BenQ XL2730Z. The BenQ is sold out everywhere though.
I think I can deal with TN for all those other great features. Since I'm thinking of going team red this time around FreeSync makes sense too.
I'll be damned if I buy into Gsync, nvidia greed has gone too far.
>>52991263
I just got one of those too. it was on sale for like $400. I love it so far, made me upgrade my other 1080 to a 1440
>>52993002
Shit nigga where was that sale?
I really wish a 2560x1600 IPS monitor existed in 25" or 27".
>>52991485
I have one of those too. It's pretty nice
>>52992700
I know that feel. Still using my Acer X223W I got for a hundred bucks around 5 years ago. Just now I'm ready for a new monitor but waiting for more freesync options to come out so prices aren't so crazy high for the 144hz 1440p ones. Planning on getting a decent GPU soon too.
>>52992963
I read a few reviews and the only things the Asus one loses against the IPS version is a bit of contrast and the viewing angles (it's TN after all) but everything else like color, brightness, etc is virtually the same, plus a much wider freesync range so for 200€ less it was a no brainer. I'm not doing graphic design in my PC either.
>>52993173
The premium for those extra pixels is too great.
>>52991642
Won't happen
>>52993285
Good to know, looks like I know what monitor I'm getting in the near future.
>>52993357
It already happened.
There are 3 on the market which hit 144Hz, unfortunately they're prohibitively expensive.
>>52991130
1080p, 144hz, 1ms, Freesync, price is nice
http://gmaster.iiyama.com/gb_en/products/g-master-gb2488hsu-b2/
http://gmaster.iiyama.com/gb_en/products/g-master-gb2788hs-b1/
>>52993408
>1080p
For real though, I want one with the full range enabled. Asus' MG almost had everything right, but then the stupid limit was set in and it ruined everything.
>>52993392
Yeah they sit at the 700 USD price point. Maybe 650 for the freesync version.
>>52993436
going to buy the iiyama later on
1440p meme is overpriced now
Best - 1440 ultrawide 60hz IPS
Have - 1080p 144hz TN
Want - 1440 ultrawide IPS
New DP when? Ultrawides and UHD are stuck at shit refreshes.
Just ordered both:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA4JH2M09407 for $209
and
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824106004&cm_re=acer_xb271hu-_-24-106-004-_-Product
Plus a 2 arm mount. Gonna use the 1440p 144hz IPS for PC gaming/general computing, and the korean IPS for second screen and console gaming through HDMI.
Pretty excited actually.
>>52993455
>$700
In Europe Asus/Acer adopts the "lol just change the currency symbol" strategy. The new 165Hz IPS Asus is £700 ($1000) here.
>>52991723
>630 CAD
>>52993325
Yea, I'd just wish there were more demand for them.
>>52993583
I'm sorry.
it'd be a no brainer to buy a monitor right now if 1440p wasn't so goddamn expensive.
I think skipping it and going 4k will actually be cheaper than buying 1440p now and 4k in a couple years.
If the new display ports get released do I have to buy a new 4K monitor or will it support my current 4K monitor @ 60Hz and get overclocked to 75Hz?
>>52993673
exactly, fuck the 1440p
going with full hd, 144hz freesync
>>52993500
Isn't 1.3 coming soon to resolve this issue?
>>52993673
Actually you're probably right. A lot of manufacturers seem to be skipping 1440p for UHD. Even Tomshardware's best monitors list doesn't even have a 1440p section.
I'm hesitating between the H257HU (25", IPS, 60 hz) and the XG270HU (27", TN, 144hz. Also freesync but I have a nVidia card).
The XG270 is 130 bucks more expensive. Not sure if getting the extra size and hertz but losing the IPS panel is worth it...
What are your thoughts brehs ?
>>52993673
I'd have to agree, but running stuff at UHD is just really bad right now. My 3570k runs just about everything on Dolphin, but it can get a little troublesome. I couldn't imagine how 1440p or even UHD fares.
>>52991130
>which are the best?
I'd love a hidpi 16:10 60+Hz ips freesync panel
>which do you have?
1080p 60Hz ips
>which are you planning on buying next?
2160p 60Hz ips
>>52991130
>which are the best?
I'd say 4K, 60Hz, IPS currently. I prefer resolution over refresh rate.
>which do you have?
1200p 60Hz IPS
1440p 60Hz IPS
2160p 60Hz IPS, FreeSync
>which are you planning on buying next?
4K 120Hz IPS with GSync/FreeSync at least, but who knows what else comes out, maybe OLED, 10bit HDR or whatever else.
>>52993725
They're about the same price on Amazon. Either way it all comes down to how important IPS is to you vs 144hz. I personally lean towards 144hz because I hate screen tearing and ghosting, freesync helps with that too. Just plan to get an AMD card if you bother to get a freesync monitor, it's a great feature that you should read up on. Also make sure the freesync range is wide enough, preferably 40-144hz at least.
>>52993725
Why not this IPS monitor over that Acer? This one has a better stand by far.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00VRKVGJG/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_S_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=3NJGOHE30UBO4&coliid=I2SPURDADZDJ84
>>52993695
You'd need a new monitor as well as a new graphics card to benefit from the increased bandwidth, same as USB, SATA, HDMI, etc.
>>52993695
Your current monitor doesn't support DP1.3 most likely, so you won't get any increased bandwidth. Monitor OC isn't that simple either, just because the connection from your graphics card to your monitor has extra bandwidth doesn't mean that your monitor can actually run flawlessly at higher refresh rate.
>>52991130
>tfw 40" 4k VA
>tfw 1440p 144hz TN gsync panel for vidya
>1080p IPS for everything else
Why don't you anons just get both? Someday we'll get an AHIPS 1440p 144hz that doesn't have god awful quality issues, but that hasn't happened yet.
>>52991130
1440p 144hz is the best right now.
>>52993725
There's the XF270HU as well, 144Hz, 1440p, IPS and FreeSync. It's pretty much the best FreeSync IPS monitor if you're going for 1440p in terms of specs on paper. No idea how it stacks up in practice.
>>52995277
I'm happy with my 4K 60Hz FreeSync monitor. I'd rather have amazing sharpness instead of 60+Hz as long as I can't have both.
I'm on 60 hz 1440p IPS
I would never go back to a tn panel
My next panel will probably be a 144 hz ips panel
>3 dell 2007FP's
>2 misc. 1680x1050 20"
no plans to upgrade
>>52991130
waiting on UHD(4k)@120 displays with FreeSync coming out next Winter.
no compromises (except your bank account)
>>52991705
4:3 monitors might work well for that, they're suprisingly tall in portrait though
I just don't know anymore, I tried 4 different Asus MG279Q and they all had bad bleeding.
All I want is a 27-30", IPS or OLED, 144+hz, 2560x1440+, freesync monitor that costs less than 700€ and doesn't have bleeding or glow everywhere.
>>52995665
IPS will always glow, just like TN will always have a severe color inversion vertical angle limit and VA will always have subtle posterization and positional color shift.
They each have stronger use case scenarios, but you're probably just better off using IPS for workstation displays with the light in the room on or watching a VA TV from the couch in a dark room.
>>52991130
i prefer my korean 27" 1440p 100hz IPS.
15.6"
3840x2160
IPS
48Hz
Honest question, does anything about 60Hz really have notable benefits if you're not a professional FPS player?
I have 2560x1080p IPS @60hz.
It's really nice.
>>52991130
Can anyone recommend a good budget 1080p (~$150) ?
>>52995866
strobed backlights make motion VASTLY clearer, but you need >100 Hz strobing to avoid perceivable flicker, and you need display update rate, the strobe rate, and the content frame rate to all match in order to work.
high motion clarity just feels a shit ton better regardless of whether you're playing anything competitive.
120 Hz sports broadcasts will be nice when they start in the next 5-10 years.
>>52991240
>trying to use 4k monitors
>using X.org
>>52995578
I'm having a hard time finding any accurate dimensions on small monitors.
I'm looking for something about 250mm in height (without the stand)
Ive been looking into 144hz monitors today and maybe someone with experience can help me out.
How important is adaptive refresh rate (aka gsync or freesync? Im guessing at 144hz I probably will not notice tearing anyway, so it might only help on games I cannot play with very high frames per second.
Do adaptive refresh rate technologies introduce noticeable amount of input lag? Just for comparison, 60 fps vsync input lag is extremely noticeable.
How import are the anti motion blur technologies like lightboost or nvidia ulmb?
It seems with gsync you have to choose between less motion blur or adaptive refresh rate (ulmb) but cannot have both. Which is more important?
I googled and read a lot about that already but I'd like more points of view. My current standpoint is that for 144 hz anti motion blur is better than adaptive refresh rate but for 60fps gaming adaptive refresh rate could be worth it.
>>52997539
By height do you mean width, as the monitor will be in portrait? If so that's going to be a tiny monitor, to give you an idea my 19" 5:4 one is about 410mm wide so you're going to be looking at like 15-17", maybe even smaller, depending on the aspect ratio.
Why exactly are you so limited on space, and why must it be portrait? I can't imagine many scenarios where you'd be limited on the height of the monitor.
>>52997936
Might as well give some links for other people looking into the topic too.
http://120hzmonitors.com/144hz-monitor-buyers-guide-february-2016/
http://www.blurbusters.com/
Were really helpful for me. I also read some threads for user experience on /r/buildapc
>>52997969
Sorry about the confusion. Yes, I suppose I am talking about width as the monitor will be in portrait.
As to why it needs to be so small, it's going to be a second monitor, and with my current monitor and a set of speakers my desk-space is pretty limited.
>>52997936
I can't say I've noticed it but I've read that you can still get tearing running below the monitor's refresh rate as well as stuttering (due to repeated frames), that's what Freesync and Gsync are supposed to fix.
If you don't want to pay extra for either of those then the next best option is to turn down the settings/get more GPU power until you can maintain the monitor's refresh rate and then turn on V sync, or if you don't like the lag then you can turn on frame rate limiting if your card supports it (newer AMD cards do, no idea when it comes to Nvidia) with the added bonus that the frame rate doesn't halve if it drops below the refresh rate. Also the power draw and heat output will drop too.
>>52998209
I'm confused, can you clarify whether you're limited in horizontal or vertical space? It seems like you lack horizontal but I assumed you were height limited.
If you are limited in width then finding a monitor 250mm tall (which would be its width when rotated) will be a bit easier. You're best bet would probably be an 18.5" 16:9 monitor (the panel would be 230mm high, plus the bezels and it would be a tad over 250mm if you can make a tiny bit extra room). However at that size you're only going to get 1366x768.
>>52991130
xb270hu 144hz ips 1440p gsynch
I had to sell my old 1080p 60hz because it felt like a damn slideshow compared to it.
It's like memechanical keyboards all over again, once you go 144hz everything else feels terrible.
And oh man the gaymes with a 980ti you can get 144fps+ in most but even if it drops a bit gsynch makes it so fluid you can barely notice, I really thought gsynch/freesynch was just a meme.
Also 1440p at 27" is perfect for productivity, you can have your IDE at one side and your brownser to shitpost at /g/ or check stackoverflow and both will be big enought to not make you want to go fullscreen.
700€ is really a lot for a monitor but I don't regret a single cent.
>>52998445
Horizontal space.
Does this picture clarify what I mean?
>>52991240
Windows 10 has dogshit scaling, despite being "improved" supposedly. It's a blurry fucking mess because it seems to do some image-level resizing, meanwhile W8.1 at the same scaling level is sharp in the vast majority of applications, including the ones which are blurry shit on W10.
It's mind boggling how MS can fuck this up.
Haven't tried desktop Linux since I got my 4K screen, frankly just the thought of configuring a 3 monitor setup with different DPIs is a nightmare, so I've been putting it off.
>>52998499
If that's your actual setup then what I suggested would be fine, the monitor would just extend further in front of the speaker by about 1cm or so.
Have you considered wall mounting the speakers to get you a bit of extra room? Also another thing to consider is wall mounting the second monitor above the first so that you can go even bigger.
>>52995831
A bit of glow is fine and like you said IPS will always glow, but the bleeding totally isn't and I'm tired of having to play the lottery each time I want to buy a new monitor.
Especially when I heard there was a way for manufacturer to add something that would greatly reduce any bleeding but very few implement it because it would raise slightly the price.
>>52997936
To me the adaptive refresh rate tech solves an age old issue and when it becomes a standard maybe we will see reasonable prices.
are curved monitors good or are they nothing more than the latest meme?
>tfw no ultrasharp with freesync
They said newer generations would have it but that cheap 4k screen don't have it
>>53001529
Maybe nvidia is trying to get them to use Gsync exclusively.
>>53001587
I doubt they will agree, seeing how intel are gonna support it too, its just a matter of time until it becomes a standard
>>52991130
I have a 144hz 1080p and I'm pretty happy with it
I cant run much on full 144 but pushing past 60 is quite the superior experience
>>52991217
I bought a CrossOver 2795QHD recently, its the new meme korean monitor
What's the best 1440p 144hz IPS monitor, /g/?
>>53001619
Sounds good, I hope there's tons of freesync monitors to choose from. Going team red this time
>>53001619
It's too bad, Gsync works a lot better
I have the Acer gd235hz
>4k
What? For a desktop monitor? How? Wouldn't that completely kill legibility unless it's like at least 30'?'
>>52991130
>waiting to save enough money for AMD's next gpu, a second 1080p 144hz panel, and a 144hz 1440p tn panel
>currently using a 770, two 1080p 60s on the side, and a 1080p 144 in the middle.
>want to have two 1080p 144s on the side and a 1440p 144 in the middle.
>>52991130
None. Already using an Asus PA279q
>>52991130
>>4k 60 Hz ips (richfags pls go)
P2715Q here
replaced an almost 9 year old 2405FPW
>>53002477
Same reason a high PPI looks good on phones, things look clearer because the pixels are so small, less jagged edges everywhere.
if you're getting a large monitor like 30+ inches for 4K, it kind of kills the PPI.
a 40 inch 4K has the same PPI as a 20inch 1080p, how does that 1080p display look when you compare it to some high ppi/retina display ?
4k 120hz OLED
>>52991130
Probably going for 1440p 144Hz when I feel like upgrading, but I just can't justify spending any more than ~$100 on a computer part given how undemanding my needs are
Looking for ~250 dollar >24" >60hz 1080p monitor.
Any ideas? I'd prefer acer since i already have two.
>1080p LCD
>1152p LCD
>you'll never get a better version of your 1152p monitor
;_;
There is no best. Depends on use
I have a sony fw900 and an IBM t221. I use them both and have no plans on getting new ones. Both very high quality displays.
Any reason I shouldnt buy a Dell UltraSharp U3415W 34-Inch Curved monitor?
Ive been looking forward to buying one for quite awhile, as I havent had the money until now. Only down side I see is the price.
>>52995327
It seems there is a (firmware?) bug that doesn't allow OD on the XF270HU through display port, yes HDMI works but there is no freesync over HDMI yet. Monitor is rated for HDMI 2.0 in addition to that, but no AMD card as of yet does HDMI 2.0.
That said, if you get a good one with little light bleed and no weird spottiness it's solid. My recommendation is probably to wait a little to see what else the market offers.
What's a cheap (<250$) Korean that is
>1080p
>not over 24"
>anything but TN
>HDMI connected
It'd be secondary display, Hz doesn't matter.
>>52991167
Literally a work monitor
>>53005633
Just checked, and found this
http://community.acer.com/t5/Monitors/XF270HU-Overdrive-and-firmware-bugs/td-p/405267
it looks like Overdrive is enabled when freesync is on, it's just not modifiable. So sayth the lord acer
What are good monitors for stereo gaming?
>>52991130
i like my 1366x768 IPS
>>52996017
The flicker at 60hz isn't even that bad. It sure is nice being able to play games that are locked at 60fps with no blur at all than be able to task switch to my desktop and move my cursor around and have it also be perfectly smooth and clear. I'll trade a little flicker for perfect motion clarity any day.
>>53006397
>at all than
*then
I'm getting a 2560 x 1080 IPS ultrawide that can oc to 75hz
Best sweet spot imo, would love 85hz, anything more than that is nice but not necessary unless you play cs
>>52991130
>4k 60 Hz ips (richfags pls go)
They're like 400 quid
144hz or into the trash it goes
I dont know if this is the right place to ask but I bought a new monitor (LG 34um67) recently and it makes a quiet but really annoying high pitch sound. I installed all drivers and everything but I dont know how to fix it. What do /g/ ?
Qnix 2710
I really like it, but I kind of regret it, the big size is neat for single player and stuff but kind of a detriment in competitive FPS, and the extra load on my gpu is not really welcome for single player vidya either
I dont plan on splurging on high end gpus constantly, maybe once 1080p/ips/144hz stuff is available on the cheaper end I'll switch to one of those, that would let me drive pretty games at 1080/60, and competitive stuff at 144 too.
>>53008730
play in a window, then
>>53008872
Thats more than a little distracting for whats supposed to be immersive single player vidya
have 1x1080p 60hz tn
buying 2 more 1080p 60hz tn when I get some more cash soon
24" 1080p AH-IPS
Saving out on cash for a PC revamp.
Polaris GPU and good Freesync monitor next.
>>53008931
Sounds like a terrible choice
me me want 4k just for porn and movies.
everyone talks shit about video games and 4k, but video games aren't the only media.
just use the 1080 144 for gaming or a 1440 if i get one.
>>53008934
>good Freesync monitor
which one?
>>53008934
My nigga. I'm hoping a good 1440p IPS/VA/"something other than TN" monitor comes out with a good refresh rate. I won't even mind if it's ultrawide.
>tfw probably upgrading from a 3570k too
>tfw Broadwell-E or Zen
>tfw NVMe 1TB SSD
My wallet isn't ready. I'll probably do a full upgrade and wait out on xPoint. I don't know what I'm going to do with this PC however.
>>53009105
For what reason you'd bother upgrading the CPU?
What will make use of it?
Two
One is E1700S
Other is SC22C300
I picked up that 17" for less than £10 and tried to hook it up to the pc using dvi cable. For whatever reason my card (960) didn't see the monitor and had to get a hdmi adapter.
It does the job and is quite useful for Unreal
>>52993629
its $580 CAD, order it from newegg, my order came to $700 total
>>53003548
Anyone pls help?
>>53009376
go with DELL IPS
>>53009443
>>53009376
Don't they still use their dogshit AG coating?
my U2412m looks like crap next to the cheapshit korean qnix 2710
>>53009142
Just for encoding and maybe getting a little more juice on emulators.
Can anyone reply me, please?
>>>53009088
I know I should've replied to this thread and not opening that, but please, might you answer?
Daily reminder that VA>PLS>IPS>TN
>>53009788
can you actually name a difference between pls and ips?
>>53008905
i meant for the multiplayer games, and playing the game in a window on a black background would probably be less distracting than whatever is behind your monitor
>>53010143
The multiplayer games I have no problem with, I lower the settings on them anyway for better visiblity so most of them run at several hundred FPS
I guess I could reduce window size to have more in my focus but to me, any lit surface, even if black, is more distracting than whatever that is not a glowing screen.
>>53009443
I don't need IPS.
I'm looking for a monitor thats 144hz, 1080p, atleast 27 inch and 5ms or less for around 250.
>>53010185
IIYAMA G-MASTER GB2788HS-B1
>>53010185
>1080p, atleast 27 inch
Vomit inducing.
>>53010176
sounds like you'd need a new monitor regardless, then
>>53010230
I don't care about looks, im a CSGO player.
>>53010312
And a big screen will help you in that how?
Having more things in your periphery and not in your focus?
>>52991263
>TN
>AMD
>>53010355
I play on a 27 inch screen. Its what im used to, and btw most pros play with 4:3 black bars. :^)
>4K becoming the de facto standard
>buying 1080p monitors today
why ???
>>53010424
Because 4K is expensive and my card can't handle gaming at 4K anyway.
>>53010395
Which really only supports my point.
>>53010460
its no more expensive than some Asus ROG monitors listed here
if you can't game at 4K then just scale it..
meanwhile you have the benefits of a high PPI display *all the time*
>>52993507
>red and black gaymen monitor
How big of a faggot are you?
>>53010395
>pro players
>>53010487
Black bars cut off part of the screen. It isn't shrinking everything and putting it into the smaller area, it just cuts that part off. Its common that it gets people killed in a match.
Your point is incorrect, and you still haven't answered my question.
>>53010531
You didn't ask a question?
>>53010518
>LDLC
this actually just helps my point that peripheral vision doesn't matter so much.
>>53010555
Monitor thats 27 inch, atleast 120hz, 1080p, ~250 dollars or less.
>>53010579
Well I wouldn't know now would I?
Ask your "pro csgo players", I'd hope most people here don't look for monitors like that.
>>53010597
Jesus christ you're a faggot.
>>53010624
You are an assfuck who plays only one game, why the fuck are you even on this board, why do you think others would want or know about the stupid-niche things you need?
I'll refer you to this anons post
>>53010518
since it was far more entertaining in describing your situation than what I can do
I have had a BenQ G2222HDL 21.5" LED DVI for the last 7 years. As I'm upgrading everything, andI love 1080, I'm moving from that to dual LG 24MP57VQ-P, one landscape, one portrait side.
>>53010673
You're an assfuck that argues about something you obviously don't know about then you get mad and insult me because you don't understand that what you said was wrong.
>>53010737
What I said is right, The focus area of your vision is small, a 27" screen over a 24" one is detrimental to your focus on it.
You seem to have massive issues following our conversation, probably because you are mad fucking stupid.
Go "compete".
>>53010777
Have you even ever played a match of csgo before? You're a moron. A larger screen helps. It doesnt matter whats on the edge of your screen, you should be aiming where you think the enemy will be.
Stop talking about things you don't understand, unless you know of a monitor that fits within the specs i posted earlier.
Has anyone tried the Dell 27" 144hz TN?
£380 from Overcockers UK
>>53010677
How did I do?
24" 1080p GSYNC less than $400 with amazing reviews..
Lazy here:
1x1920x1080 24"
1x1650x910 20"
3x1440x900 21"
1x300x200 crt 4"
Soon©1x4k40"
Pic related with extra junk monitors turned on.
>>53011957
Good mouse anon.
>>53011957
>falling for the 4K40" meme
There isnt any good good LCD monitors, but here's some contenders:
>NEC LCD2190WUXI
>NEC LCD2490WUXI
>Eizo SX3031W
>Eizo CG303W
>NEC PA301W
>NEC PA302W
>Eizo CX240, 241, CG247
>Eizo CX271/CG277
>NEC PA322UHD
Nothing else is worthwhile, and the NEC 30" 8:5 monitors are subject to debate as well, because they have absolutely horrible glow, especially the AH-IPS 302W.
Most of these have untolerable amount of input lag as well.
>1440p
2560x1440 is not an television standard or resolution and therefore non-interlaced is given.
>>52991130
>which are the best?
1440p 144hz IPS
>which do you have?
1440p 144hz TN
>which are you planning on buying next?
Nothing solid. Waiting to see 4k 144hz pans out like.
>tfw still running my two old 1080p 60hz tn monitors
guess with how things are looking I'll upgrade when 4k ips get cheaper.
