Previous Thread
>>52901240
Question: Decent 5.1 speaker or a decent Headphone for movies?
cool, finally a place to ask my question:
i am looking into improving my audio setup, and by improving i mean repalcing all of it.
so far i decided on getting the Audioengine D1 DAC but no idea what speakers to get. Few people i know personally suggested getting active ones, but adviced against Audioengine A5 (which i thought to be good match for the DAC) in favor of KRK Studio Monitors.
I primary intention is to have a setup capable of delivering solid sound while playig quiet atmospheric songs eg:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeitwokBmFM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1EvclXK57k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjcfY5lLTz4
looking forward to your suggestion /g/entleman
>>52970490
KRK Studio Monitors are pretty good to get if you're looking for used speakers, and if you have no intention of using them for actual audio production since they have bloated bass.
Otherwise, it's courtesy to include budget and listening space to get a better idea of what to suggest you.
I've always been a fan of Swan speakers when it came to powered speakers. Look up chanemusiccinema; the HiVi D1080IV were the last powered speakers I bought and they were much better than any studio monitor costing twice as much.
>>52972452
meant to link to you.
>>52972494
>>52970490
No budget, no recommendation.
Kef 104/2s reporting in
>>52972494
around $500, listening space see image
>>52972585
If you're watching movies on a desktop monitor, go headphones
If you have a TV, speakers
>>52972593
i have headphones for gaming (Steelseries Sybiria V2), i ma looking for boxes to listen to ambient music while watching the sunset out the window
Speakers of decent quality will almost always be better at the same price point. Just don't get "pc speakers" or an all in one solution.
>>52972655
>>52972506
Do you recomend a budget speaker? Around $200
>>52972632
cozy up loud
Posted this in other thread, but will post it again
I have a question.
Is it better to use studio monitors or receiver/speaker combo?
I need 2 speakers for my desk, and I don't know what to buy.
I was thinking about buying some kind of 7.2 receiver and 2 shelf speakers, with sub eventually, but would be studio monitors be better choice?
>tl;dr
>studio monitors vs receives/speaker combo
I saw the Klipsch pro media today at Best Buy. Definitely larger than I thought and that is a plus! I did see the Logitech shit that did look better, but not spec wise.
Gonna pick up the speakers near the end of the week.
Im in need of a small pair of speakers where I can hear everything, loudness does not matter to me, as I will just use them to transcribe songs.I just need to be able to hear the instruments well. Any recs?
Thinking about getting some Micca MB42X.
Will this be a good purchase?
>>52974321
considering its celebrated and go-to recommendations all around... yeah its fine and not a mistake
unless you have more budget and space...
>>52974370
>celebrated and go-to recommendations all around
I had no idea. Sweet.
>>52973868
Studio monitors are great, but they are fairly directional. Some of them can get very spendy, buy so can buying a receiver and bookshelf speakers.
What's your budget? You can get some really kickass sound from Bowers &/Wilkins, floorstanding speakers can pack some serious punch, but if it's just you listening to them you're probably better off with studio monitors.
I like to keep receivers for home theater and general media, studio monitors for computer.
>>52974289
What you're describing are studio monitors, however they generally aren't very small.
>>52974634
For products that I was looking, pair of studio monitors costs about same/less than some receiver/speaker combo.
I don't wanna go and spend same amount of money on 7.2 receiver with all options, because I don't wanna to buy something mediocre, when for same amount of money that I'm going to spend on receiver only, I can get great pair of studio monitors.
looking foe advice on decent 5.1 speakers sub 200
but i think everything is trash sub 200, amirite?
I don't know much about speakers but I've wanted a pair of KRK Rokit 6 (specifically grey limited edition since I saw / listened to them in a music shop I worked) for some years.
Any better options for about the same money?
Listened to Yamaha HS50s as well and prefer KRK. Already have a pair of KRK KNS8400 as well.
>>52974867
if you like them you should totally go for them
>>52974897
I'm a bit clueless to what I'll need besides the actual speakers though.
I remember it as external sound card, stand(s) and cables but that all added up to like $700 in this gommie-tier tax country.
>>52974867
So its $400 for pair?
all around recommended to the point of obnoxious are JBL LSR308
should be miles ahead
I personally would never go for powered ones, because of buzz of build in amp and them dying sooner or later
for passive I would consider
>ELAC Debut B6
pair for $300
and some amp+dac
>FX Audio D802
but other anon is right, if you listened to them and fell in love then they are fine choice I guess
so I had recently ordered this z506 system. not sure what's wrong with it but I just got a refund so I'm thinking of using this as a chance to revamp my audio setup.
are there any guides/recommendations for speakers/amp setups?
>>52974321
I was going to buy those but ended up buying the Fluance SX6 instead and love it.
>>52975069
https://www.reddit.com/r/AverageJoeAudiophile/comments/3uoksp/i_have_xxxxx_to_spend_what_should_i_buy_bookshelf/
https://www.reddit.com/r/AverageJoeAudiophile/comments/2x0b47/i_have_xxxxx_to_spend_what_should_i_buy/
>>52974996
stands are useful but since the 6" aren't too big you can usually just prop them up with something on the desk just as well
you can use them with any kind of connectors (as then have RCA, XLR and TRS) as long as you have the right adapters for it, but the most common problem is the volume control
for example if you just use one of the typical 3.5mm jack to 2x RCA cables to hook them up straight to the mainboard's audio out then you'd need to control the volume with only the windows audio mixer. which works, but can be really annoying sometimes and even a bit dangerous in case of a freeze or crash that outputs full volume straight to your face - all you can do is unplug
you can use a hardware volume control like the TC level pilot to have some control right on your desk but mostly people go with the small audio interface route, for example a little box like the focusrite scarlet 2i2 is only a tad more than the level pilot and is a full blown sound card with symmetric outputs and a volume control on the front
Can anyone recommend good amp for 2 bookshelf speakers?
I don't need something superfancy, but sound quality needs to be decent.
I was thinking about something like this:
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Pure-digital-amplifier-D802-remote-USB-optical-coaxial-input-192KHZ-80W-2-Free-shipping/32259504994.html?ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_6,searchweb201644_5_505_506_503_504_301_502_10001_10002_10016_10017_10010_10005_10011_10006_10003_10004_10009_10008,searchweb201560_2,searchweb1451318400_-1,searchweb1451318411_6450&btsid=f1e8541a-3753-4747-9d7c-173fdcbd969a
>>52975140
it seems very fine
I saw it being talked here
https://www.reddit.com/r/BudgetAudiophile/comments/42ryx2/just_got_this_little_powerfull_thing_today_a_100/
theres are some links there for reviews
FX-Audio D802C Wireless Bluetooth Version version got also RCA input, so could be more versatile
I got smsl sa-60, its fine, very fitting for my use case, can recommend
>>52975140
A reputable stereo receiver or integrated amp for the 80's, new shit is almost always placebo tier.
>>52975239
nigger you should maybe read up more from audiophile world
modern D amps are considered superior in quality of music representation to 150W marantzs from 1985
>>52975278
>reading what shills tell you
>>52975213
>>52975239
>>52975278
D802C seems like reasonable choice.
I just don't know what speakers would be better in this case
80W x 4ohms or 50W x 8ohms?
>>52975334
>reading is for queers
what would you guys use for the tv ?
>>52975350
>I just don't know what speakers would be better in this case
Budget?
And you dont need to worry that much about watts
its just for max, and depending on speakers sensitivity, you wont go anywhere 50W, or you will go deaf
>unironically considering any other active bookshelf speakers than ADAM AX/SX series
>>52975418
Budget is somewhere around 300$ with amp included.
But I can step over it, if someone have suggestions.
Im planning on buying pic related soon.
babbys first decent Bookshelf Speakers
>>52975467
google about ELAC Debut B6 or ELAC Debut B5 if budget restriction and space...
pair of B6 is $280
pair of B5 is $230
>>52975102
Similar price?
![41WrBdCDRjL._SX300_[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/HOPxYVb.jpg "41WrBdCDRjL._SX300_[1].jpg")
I've had these for like 10 years now and they're still going strong.
>>52975423
>not EVE Audio, where all the ADAM engineers work now since ADAM has shitty investors all the way up the ass ruining their products
nah, I'm good
>>52975544
Do you use them for movies as well? For surround effect?
What kind of level response would be expected from an entry level studio monitor like the alesis Elevate 5? Would they be acceptably accurate for someone literally just starting to get into music prod?
>>52975516
Apparently, it's not easy to find this speakers in Europe, so are there any alternatives to this?
>>52976040
disregard them
I just read the review on http://noaudiophile.com of B5 and they need a shitload of power to sound well
I got monitor audio BX2, they might be around where you live, and in UK(where they are based) they are often rather cheap because new iteration came out - B2
then wharfedales are woth to checkout, depending on availability near you
check german or UK amazon, sometimes its lucky and theres shipping to other countries, but returning might be costly if not ideal
>>52970490
Those are definitely speakers. I would NOT use them as headphones.
>>52975140
Looking at buying this as my first amp in combination with 2 Micca MB42X speakers. Thoughts?
>>52975334
>>52975239
>Ten years after...Happy anniversary T-Amp!
>Exactly ten years ago (January, 2005) we published a review that quickly caused a stir among audiophiles around the world: the T-Amp phenomenon was born! That controversial article made online sales of the tiny, cheap and unbelievably good sounding Class D amplifier increase exponentially, so much that even the financial magazine Forbes published an article (see excerpt below) about the unexpected success of the small Company selling the T-Amp. The guys at Sonic Impact weren't aware of the huge potential of that small plasticky toy they were selling for about 25$. Now the Company seems to be out of business (at least, their website no longer exists) but during the early days of the T-Amp they used to sell 4,000 units per month (and just few hundreds before our review).
http://www.tnt-audio.com/edcorner/january15.html
Good sound back in the days was good sound.
Good sound back in the days is still good sound.
Unlike screens, TVs, computers etc, there's no need to get the latest and newest.
Just in case you didn't know or haven't thought about that yet.
>>52975379
a trashcan
>>52976251
Fuck off D class shills
>>52975239
>A reputable stereo receiver or integrated amp for the 80's
That's actually what I'm looking for right now. Mostly because they look rad as fuck.
>SX-3700
>Realistic STA-2290
Are the ones I'm looking at right now. But I basically have no idea what to look for. These old receivers will require a DAC, right?
>>52975514
Lepai amps are not good, I'm not an audiophile freak but I don't understand why /g/ like this meme amp.
>>52974370
What stands are those? I have the isoacoustics stands but with the tall posts they're kind of wobbly. Would be nice to have a tall platform like that
>>52976235
bump. thoughts?
>>52978961
as It's written here
>>52975213
D802C is better option for amp
>>52977411
because its cheap
however 80's amps are better than lepai shit and only a bit more expensive and sometimes the same
>>52979103
is the main difference just the bluetooth?
I love my HS80M.
Also double as a nice monitor stand.
>>52979392
>HS80M
>monitor stand
whats wrong with you
>>52979301
RCA input is main thing here.
Long story, but I need to replace my current $30 USB soundbar with a pair of 3.5mm speakers for my desk. I don't want to spend any more than ~$50. Can anyone give me any suggestions?
suggestions for desktop speaker stands?
>>52980820
DIY
>>52979842
I don't think they make speakers that small, anon.
>>52979842
Sorry anon, but I don't think speakers that small even exist..
>>52980909
but I don't have k'nex
>>52979392
I second this
they're pretty useful to prop up laptops as well
>>52979842
>3.5mm speakers
What is this? A speaker for ants?
>>52980926
>>52980951
>>52981371
Oh christ not this shit again. What the fuck do I say then? I just want some suggestions.
>>52981727
maybe learn measurements?
>>52982379
Fine, I want a pair of speakers that don't transmit their audio signal via a USB cable but instead a 3.5mm audio cable that cost approximately $50 and that can fit on my desk.
>>52982647
you need an active pair of speakers for that, but good like trying to find a pair that isnt total shit.
just get a pair of passive speakers and an amp
>>52982968
I'm aware they'll be shit compared to passive speakers. I'm currently using a $30 speaker bar so literally anything is a step up. Like I said it's a long story why I need a new set otherwise I'd just keep using the shit speakers, I have a pair of JVC HA-SZ2000s for decent listening so that's not my concern. Do you know of any sub-$50 Active speaker/Amp-passive-combo that I could get? If I really need to I'd even consider up to $100 for both the speakers and amp but from my understanding that won't even buy half an amp let alone the speakers too.
>>52979813
alright, so would the D802C work with 2 Micca MB42X speakers? Probably a retarded question, but I've been a shit-tier speaker user for years.
I'm looking for a simple high quality bluetooth/wireless speaker for my bedroom.
I've been interested in both the Bose Sound Touch 20 and Sound Touch 30, and reviews are saying they're fantastic.
My only issue is the price. It's damn expensive and I live in Australia and the price is already jacked up.
Generally all I do is hook up my laptop or smartphone via bluetooth or auxiliary.
If anyone has any idea of something of equivalent quality for a lesser price I'd be greatly interested to hear your point of view.
>>52983224
Get an ebay/chinese $20-30 t-amp. Spend the rest on entry level bookshelf speakers off of craigslist from Energy, Infinity, or whatever other reputable maker.
Bam. That'll blow away any computer/bluetooth speaker.
3.5mm is compatible with RCA jacks - you just need to go buy a cable.
Is there any alternatives to a reciever so i can alternate between using headphones and my speakers?
my receiver is massive, and i'd like something smaller.
I'd just get a headphone amp but then i'd lose the ability to easily switch to my speakers.
What are my options?
>>52983462
All you have to do is find a headphone amp that has the added function of doubling as a preamp. So, it'll have a line output that's volume-controllable. They're not uncommon, but you might have to pay more. Then get a small speaker amp to use as a power amp.
e.g. here's a DAC that has all the functions you want:
www.matrix-digi.com/en/products/58/index.html
>>52983363
Anyone got any ideas?
>>52983462
You can get an integrated amplifier and not necessarily a stereo receiver.
I'm using a Maverick Audio A1 for my monitors and headphones.
Being fed by a Matrix Mini-I DAC
>>52975536
they were about 130
why is everyone here so dam poor you guys should but some good equipment
>>52983363
Those are decent, but you're paying money for their WiFi streaming capabilities. Check out the Harman Kardon Onyx speaker. Better on a budget, battery powered, and the latest Onyx 2 has Bluetooth and aux
>>52970490
Got a pair of old-ish technics tower speakers with the receiver for free from the guy who was remodeling the house next door for free a while back.
Loving these things.
>>52974321
i have the nonX version. they are great
>>52987216
>Got a free pair of free-ish technics free speakers with a free receiver for free from the free who was remodeling the free next door for free a while back.
>>52974370
>>52975514
>>52976128
Fuck memepai
>>52988659
How about tpa3116 and a nice old laptop brick?
So, does it make sense to buy 2.0 amp for 2 speakers, but run active subwoofer?
If signal is run trough sub first, would there be signal loss?
Or in this case, is it okay to use subwoofer amp instead dedicated 2.0 amp for speakers?
>>52989988
>So, does it make sense to buy 2.0 amp for 2 speakers, but run active subwoofer?
Sure if you want more low end extension.
>If signal is run trough sub first, would there be signal loss?
Nothing meaningful.
>Or in this case, is it okay to use subwoofer amp instead dedicated 2.0 amp for speakers?
No. The best setup would be to get an integrated stereo amplifier with a sub pre out. The amp will drive the two main loudspeakers and send a signal to the sub on line level. You match the volume from the subwoofer once. Most subwoofers are active designs.
Something like Yamaha A-S301 would do the trick.
Picked up these bad boys http://amzn.com/B00BXF5HQ8
Actually sounds great for the price.
>>52990247
I had a pair of CA USB speakers. Were loud as hell and sounded great. I definitely believe you on that accord. I do have a question, how much were they?
>>52990247
Just looked at link, you did good son.
Where am i supposed to sets my frequency knob on my amp to get the cleanest sound? It goes from 75 to 1k
>>52992559
What kind of amplifier is that?
>>52975544
I just replaced those with bookshelf speakers. Those are very good though they lasted me probably 7 years or so.
bump
>>52995071
why would you bring that shit to a hotel room though?
>>52983363
>reviews
let me guess, Amazon reviews?
>>52995136
For a demo
:3
Oh wise audio wizards, I come seeking your guidance. I picked up four of pic related on the cheap recently. They're in good shape, aside from needing to have the cloth grill re-covered. Did I do good?
>>52992991
This one
>>52995252
yeah if they aren't broke and cheap
>>52995302
Perfect operating condition, and got them in trade for moving some furniture.
this is my room. is it ok if the speakers are on the desk and im listening pretty much parralel to them on my bed? how would I change this set up to be optimal?
>>52995408
buy a new home
>>52995572
>hahahaha he has a rectangle room
this board lmao
>>52995572
TOP KEK
>>52995270
Normally you would equalize the sound, so that it would fit the response of the speakers.
As this looks like an instrument amplifier, you would usually tune it into what distinctive sound you want out of it.
>>52995190
muh fucking dick
>>52970490
I hope you guys can answer my question
I need a complete soundsystem, speakers and a decent amp that can utilize usb
My budget is around 400$, can you guys recommend me something?
I have the option of getting like new m50w's for $170
Should I?
>>52995190
