INTELFAGS BTFO
http://www.evga.com/articles/00979/EVGA-GeForce-GT-710/
>>52637413
> 0-1-2
>1x-2x
Wow, you mean to tell me that integrated graphics chipsets inside processors are outperformed by dedicated cards? Damn, that's impressive.
>>52637413
>G3220
lol so a 3 year old pentium is worse than their new gpu
I'm on my phone, but someone post the picture of the guy point at the Apple/Microsoft/??? conference pointing at the bar graph of 1 and 2.
>>52637446
>>52637477
this
0/10
op is a faggot
>>52637633
OP didn't fabricate those numbers
EVGA did in OP's linked article
>>52637432
Bigger is better, right? The green bar is bigger, so it must be better!
I love this graph.
Running 3DMark 11 gives the score of 1 or 2?
And why is the 3d effect applied to the graph?
I assumes it is the back of the graph you should compare but why even add this confusion when you are comparing 1 vs 2?
>Intel GPUs can't even get a 2 on 3DMark11
>lowest end Nvidia GPU got a 2
It's over Intel is finished!
>>52637413
>a dedicated GPU is better than integrated
WOAH
>>52637836
>>52637446
Skylake igpu is better than low end deicated though.
>>52637713
I guess every dog really does have its day
>>52637886
>can't even get a 2 in 3DMark11
>better
>>52637810
>>52637905
>>52637413
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GT+710
>implying the 710 isnt a waste of money
You're better off using your integrated graphics and then buying a better graphics card later.
>>52637988
I think they're just being sarcastic not trolling, anon.
>>52638060
Pretty much
>>52637886
Haslel's iGPU is better than this thing, let alone Broadlel/Skymeme's.
>>52638060
Naw /g/ shitposters are just retards who backpedal by claiming socratic irony.
>>52638196
I don't even think it's possible to get a 2 in 3DMark11. It's a stupid graph, and they're making fun of that.
>>52638246
Samefagging appears to another way of backpedaling.
>1x
>2x
They are multiplying by nothing, which is zero. 1x0 = 2x0 = 0
Both are shit families
>>52637886
problem is you have to the same price as a high end GPU just to get them
>>52638437
Yeah but Nvidia is twice as shit!
Oh wait
>Worse than shit tier AMD iGPUs
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=2910&cmp[]=3220
>>52637432
Who has the poorly drawn apple 2x performance presentation?
>>52638486
its worse than 2 generation old intel igp as well
>HDMI 1.4a connector
>no HEVC Hi10p decoder
worthless piece of shit.
Where is AMD? GTX 950 and 960 are the only cards on the market with hevc decoders and HDMI 2.0.
I'm not paying £120 for a HTPC card.
>>52637477
>new GPU
Are you this fucking stupid?
>>52638612
they just launched it you dumbass, thats what new means
>>52638546
>HEVC Hi10p
why do Autists encode in Hi10p? It only makes a difference for the intermediate step, it should be truncated back down to 8bit after DCT. Unless you have a 10bit display (deep color or HDR) Hi10p is useless.
>>52639148
this
>>52639148
Because the increased precision makes it compress files better and also improves the quality. Dithering is preferable to just huge blocks of banding
>>52637413
>G3220
>>52638373
Okay then.
>>52637886
Memelakes cpu cant even calculate large primes without freezing
>>52637413
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1302143
it scored 611, so the GT 710 should get ~1200,
My i5-2540m with HD3000 is exactly as good as that.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/1210624
>that tiny ass fan
Prepare your ears.
It will be a nice primary card for VGAPassthrough when the fanless variants come out.
>>52637413
this >>52637446
>>52639518
The point is that HD3000 is just as good, and HD4000+ kicks its ass in terms of both power consumtion, and performance.
