Is it possible to post on 4chan from Windows 3.1?
Try it.
yes. i've done it.
>>52637296
How do you even connect to modern Internet from a Win3.11 machine?
>>52637296
maybe with a 4chan pass
sure, but good luck getting 4chanx to work
>>52637379
With a TCP/IP stack and some sort of network interface.
>>52637296
How did you get that high of a resolution on win 3.1?
>>52637296
Yes, but only if your hardware's beefy enough. /g/ won't even load with 8MB RAM on my old first-gen Pavilion shitbox.
>>52637379
With an Ethernet card and networking software. 3.1 and DOS were very common in the early days of the Internet and they're no stranger to networked environments.
>>52637534
you can go as high as you want as long as the driver supports it senpai
>>52637624
I can't find VMware drivers tho
no you won't find a browser that can handle the captcha
>>52637687
> using the greatest os of all time under vmware
good one. it's like you enjoy pain. and not that fun masochistic pain, that boring dull pain.
>>52637693
false. with win NT .dlls, and 32-bit extensions, you can run a version of firefox that you can /version trick into getting old captchas, and bypass the food tile shit
> tfw no one in this thread knows shit about wfw3.11
>>52637296
Maybe with a pass. Definitely possible from 98 - there are "extenders" that allow you to run NT programs, like modern browsers.
sure, i did a while ago, now i should reinstall 3.1 on my old pentium and do it for the fun with Netscape.
but it's too late for today.
![hell-yeah-motherfucker[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/uE9jide.jpg "hell-yeah-motherfucker[1].jpg")
>>52638136
>triple optical drives up in this bizznatch
there are no browsers on win3.1 that support modern JS idiots.
now.... would it be possible using just plaintext browsers via linux?
>>52639162
I mean the browsers that are terminal only like elinks, w3m, etc
>>52639162
>>52637780
Fuck off, retard.
>>52639254
enjoy running your $1000 facebook machine to get 'le chan access
