>yfw Linux looked this shitty as recently as 2013
>KDE == the Linux kernel
>>52546737
Yeah but if you put that on an older persons computer they would probably feel at home and not realize it is Linux
>>52546737
That's not the default theme.
KDE != Linux
>>52546737
>>52546905
>grandson, how come my computer is so bloated and slower than usual all of a sudden? what is this K thing in place of my start menu?
>>52546737
>2008
>as recently as 2013
Here is your (You) Pajeet. Keep up the good work.
>tfw using minimalist WMs and style with GNU plus Linux
Truly, the best feeling.
>3.2.3
Yea... I am sure this is the best we had to offer in 2013.
Even kde 4 looked better at that time.
Here is a video of normies reacting to it in 2009
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxU4CVo6xlQ
>>52546979
>13-01-08
>2008
There aren't 13 months in a year, retard.
But Anonymous, KDE 3 has been deprecated for around 8 years now! KDE Plasma 4 is already at the feature freeze stage, your image is many years late.
>>52547064
january 13, 2008
>>52546943
>older persons using the word bloated
>older persons knowing it's bloated at all
kill yourself.
>>52547064
>murricans in charge of dates
That's the ISO date, in the format DD-MM-YY.
>>52547064
>How do I date ?
It's 13 January 2008
You fucking mongoloid.
>>52547085
>>52547098
>DD-MM-YY
>not the logical YY-MM-DD
>>52547122
>logical YY-MM-DD
You mean the system used ONLY by murifats?
When someone asks you the date, you answer that it's 2016 January the 21 ?
I don't think so.
>>52547154
>You mean the system used ONLY by murifats?
And people who like their timestamped files to appear in order.
>>52547064
>being this retarded
>gnome 2.0 released in 2002
>MATE, a fork of it is still in active development 14 years later.
>mfw one desktop environment to rule them all
>>52547122
The logic is to put the more useful information first.
When someone asks you the date, he probably mean the day, rarely the month, even more rarely the year.
yfw when there's Windows desktops like this this very moment
>>52547154
Not a single person in American history has ever used that format. Ever.
>>52547154
Amerifats actually use MM-DD-YY, which is actually the most natural way to answer that question (January 21st 2016), but the stupidest to represent in text.
>>52547192
It looks bloated as fuck.
>>52547200
>most natural
>not 21st of January, 2016
step it up amigo
>>52547200
>2-1-3
>logical
>natural
lol
>>52547154
YYYY-MM-DD is the international standard (ISO 8601) for date and time related data exchange.
It has very little to do with USA and it's obese inhabitants, since amerifaggots use MM-DD-YYYY
>>52547221
>>52547230
>inserting unnecessary prepositions into your speech
Are you guys characters in a Charles Dickens novel? Someone asks you the date and you answer it's the 21st of January?
>>52547263
Le 21 Janvier 2016
So yes.
>>52547263
Europeans are inefficient about everything, speech not discluded. Why do you think the Eurozone is falling apart?
>>52547263
>literally two extra letters
>Charles Dickens
>>52547296
Hey, keep respect to your true masters you colonies.
>>52547296
You complained about inefficient language then immediately used a double negative.
>>52547364
this
>>52547318
>Hey anon, do you know what day it is?
>Why, it's the 21st of January, m'lady! *tips fedora*
>>52547384
>Is shown wrong
>Proceed to post meme
AMERICUNTS IN FULL DAMAGE CONTROL
>>52547400
>shown wrong
How exactly? Nobody communicates dates as "the 21st of January" in the English language outside of period dramas.
The proper way of formatting a date in text is YYYY-MM-DD, it's unambiguous and ascends in order. Month Day Year, however, is better for verbal communication.
The Europoor standard isn't good for either.
>>52547263
No if someone ask me the date, I would say it's the 21st.
Assuming people I talk to haven't recently woken from a coma, they would know the month we are in, as well as the year.
If I have to write something to myself, I rather use my own notation which is year,week,day of week.
Today would be 16034.
It is easier for me as the day of the week is more important when making an arrangement than how far into january we are.
>>52547448
>If I have to write something to myself, I rather use my own notation which is year,week,day of week.
>Today would be 16034.
Do you also use Stardates ?
>>52547448
>>52547497
Joke aside, I think it's a great way and I might go about using it myself.
Except I might do 1603.4
>>52547497
stardates have been changed so much, I don't think they actually mean anything.
It was my inspiration though, having a small number that is easy to understand as a complete date is nice.
When I started using the notation I was payed biweekly so any odd thursday would be a payday and finding a time to hang our with friends would always be on a weekend, so that made more sense for me.
>>52547561
I used to have it displayed on my built in clock but couldn't find the setting to do this when I updated to plasma 5...
>>52546943
Not like you're old enough to have used KDE3.
>>52547064
LOL literally retard
Here, windows in 2016
>>52547561
I have to use this format in the company I work. When I get invited to a meeting it pops up in my calendar as "... KW4 Thursday 2016 16:45"
Where KW stands for the calendar week 4.
I hate it though, why not just give me the exact date. But whatever I got used to it.
>>52547064
>>52547122
>Burgerland time and date is "logical"
>is a complete retard
>shilling wincuck
checks out
>>52547200
>>52547263
>>52547296
in German, it's more natural the other way around, so the US notation makes doubly no sense for us. and it isn't more letters either.
>eurozone falling apart
>inefficient
okay
>>52546737
linux has looked that way for decades iirc
>>52547853
Please be a joke
>>52547098
>>52547122
>>52547154
YYYY-MM-DD is the ISO standard format, dumbasses.
>>52547946
KW was fucking confusing to me at first as well, but everybody uses it and it actually is better information than some random date in a month in a system where not all months are the same length and days in months have no meaning for whether you are at the office or not.
>>52547853
Please tell me your desktop is a joke
>>52548083
>Joke
>Implying Linux themes will ever be as advanced as windows from back in 2007
>>52548136
This looks like the computer that they use B rated sci fi films
>>52547053
>video: people really like new stuff
>subtitles: people really like Vista
Pajeet stop making the subtitles.
>>52548083
don't you wish your computer as looked COOL?
>GUIs
>>52546737
https://www.kde.org/announcements/announce-3.2.3.php
>June 9, 2004
>>52548136
I actually like that one. pls, dont h8
>>52548136
I don't see any problem with this
>>52546942
I sometimes wonder if you guys have a folder full of bait response pics for these occasions.
What am I saying? Of course you do.
>>52546905
>why are there so many buttons
>what's this K shit?
>why is my start menu so fucked up?
>>52547192
Too shiny, not enough features for the shine. Polish dat turd tho
>>52546737
>that fucking dragon
>that panel
>that window design
Having the NSA look at all my files doesn't sound so bad now.
>>52547441
>nobody
You mean everybody outside of Burgerland?
>KDE 3
>as recently as 2013
KDE 4 was released in 2008.
>>52546737
>January 13, 2008
>recently as 2013
>look it is this thread again
Every fucking time you post some old desktop and claim it is recent.
2008 linix
>>52550091
Large variety of tops in 2008, will post one more after this
>>52546737
Fuck off winnigger.
Linux can look like this if you rice it.
>>52550109
Last I'll post, but th3 the variety should show OP that desktops are all different and personal preference!
Mine looked differently back then.
>>52546737
Take this you dumb 'murican turd.
>>52546737
Maximum Disgust
>>52547853
Ayyy lmao, i live right outside of fort bragg
>>52546737
>grabbing old images of linux DEs and putting them on /g/
>>52548115
the only correct answer.
>>52546737
Shitty?
>information dense
>clean, logical layout
>sane color scheme
Are you one of those graphics design fucktards that's trying to make everything look like Windows 10?
EAT SHIT AND DIE.
>>52546737
Linux is a kernel, OP.
>>52550116
I hope you realize that looks worse than the KDE image posted.
How can Linux compete this?
>>52546737
>Implying kde 3.x wasn't the best version ever made
>>52554974
it's fucking ugly m8
i really don't care what your opinions are on information, cleanliness, colour, or whatever else. it looks like it was thrown together in java. it's absolutely one of the least aesthetic environments ever designed. it's like someone heard some dude describe mac os 6 while he was at a coffee bar and decided to recreate it in flash. it's fucking fugly.
the only good liking clean distro is the previous release of debian, i wanna say its 7 and kail linux 1.0.9 and i rather leave my sytem as default, i like the ideia of crazy oses, but i enjoy a simple to use environment not gpu heavy
>>52550116
Why is it that whenever I see a riced Linux desktop, someone always has 3 or 4 panels open:
1) A terminal session compiling or installing software.
2) htop
3) Basic test code
4) (optional) an IRC client.
Like do people who rice their Linux desktops ever do actual work?
>>52554974
this
the information is so dense, every single pane has so many things going on
>>52556321
>Arch and Gentoo users
>Working
>>52547064
hahahahahahahahahhaahaa
>>52546737
kde 3.2 is from 2004
>>52556100
Jesus Christ that looks shitty!
2007 looks good to me.
>>52547154
when someone asks for the time, you start with the seconds, then say the minutes, and then you give the hour?
that's logical time and date formatting to you?
What went wrong?
>>52556100
I threw up a lot
