I mean there's no way this benchmark is correct. The 5830k got the same overall score as the fx8350 on this site...
8350 is way stronger
>>52518534
>>52518435
Price is factored into the "overall score" so of course a $1000 CPU is going to suffer in terms of score.
>>52518435
Fx 8350 is a pretty great cpu overall. Integer performance is stronger than an i7, but it's a little lacking in floating point performance.
>>52519056
How the fuck is Haswell i5 beating Haswell i7?
>>52518435
cpu boss has always been bullshit, if you just figured this out now, maybe you are retarded
>>52519056
Wrong image, sorry.
Also don't forget the fx series were competing against Ivy bridge and sandy bridge.
>>52519064
Didn't that i7 have overheating issues?
>>52519070
>AMD's top of the line CPU can't keep up with Intel's mid-high-end offerings despite having twice the cores
>>52518435
Yes, the site is shit but that aint a benchmark, is the CPU rated for the price/perfomance.
>>52519212
Holy shit, fucking lost.
Good goi :')
>>52518435
I prefer passmark when it comes to real world results https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php
It shows you how many samples have been submitted and variations between tests.
>>52519578
Yea ive used passmark as a source for a while now. I just found cpuboss recently and was doing some comparisons when I found these shitty scores