>samsung
Not even once.
>>52496640
>posting a picture of a display unit with the screen left on for 10 hours a day.
>>52496671
lcd doesn't have this problem
>>52496640
Idk
t. Edge user
>>52496640
>>52496683
>posting a display unit
>LCDs dont have this problem
Nigger please dont be this retarded. Burn in hasn't been a serious issue since the S2 days. Any current gen AMOLED display will be fine if you aren't retarded and leaving brightness at MAX and using maps or another static image for 5+ hours at a time.
Normal use with the brightness at auto and your display will last you years just fine, I have my S4 here and it's fine, I also have my Note5 here and it's still just fine as well.
LCDs dont have the color accuracy or black levels my note5 display has either.
Okay the screen is bad... But how do you decline this?
>>52496756
don't a static image on the screen for hours at a go, but with a personal unit you don't have to worry about it as you'll have the display off when it's in your pocket.
>>52496731
So don't use a Samsung phone as a GPS. In other words, don't use it as a smartphone. Great. No wonder Samsung is going down the shitter.
>>52496849
No, don't use it as a GPS at max fucking screen brightness for hours and hours on end, it's true for any organic LEDs, static images at high brightness levels will cause burn in, plain and fucking simple as that.
If you dont want burn in, dont fucking do it.
Keep it at auto brightness and you're fine.
>>52496731
Your average person may overlook the phone because of the burn in problem.
You took the bait :^)
>>52496879
I was in this thread yesterday too, I'm not fucking stupid.
>>52496849
>So don't use a Samsung phone as a GPS
What part of a GPS map doesn't change while driving?
>>52496910
The static menu buttons and the status bar.
>>52496849
Well, it's a smartphone, not a built in satnav. Use it like a fucking smartphone and you're fine, jeez.
>>52496942
>Samsung phone
>Menu buttons
Are you being a cheeky troll again, Anon?
>>52496910
The crosshair
Nice shoop, shill.
>>52496640
Why was it 12:45 for so long?
>lg
Not even once.
>>52496971
It's not a shoop retard. I took the photo with my phone.
>>52496987
If I had to guess anything displayed ontop of those fucked up areas will immediately imprint like that. 12:45 was probably just the last time that clock was turned off.
>>52496640
My s4 never had any issues. And my note 5 hasnt either. Maybe its because i dont leave my phone on a static screen for hours on end like some kind of retard
>>52497026
Who do you work for? LG? Apple? Fuck off.
Samsung is the only company worth buying phones from. They're the official brand of /g/.
feels bad
>>52497079
Spotted the shill. How's touchjizz going for you?
Meanwhile I'm here enjoying my nexus 6 :^)
Still rockin' my S5 since day one, screen as beautiful as the day I bought it. Just don't be retarded and the screen won't have burn in. You'll notice that this only happens to display units, and even then only after months.
>>52497110
You don't even have a stylus LOL. And 3 hours of screen on time what a joke. Not a shill, just an oldfag. Samsung is the /g/ brand.
>>52497141
Why would I need a stylus? Also I hope you didn't put your stylus in the wrong way because it'll get stuck :)
>>52496683
They don't have burn in but they do have image persistence problems.
It's similar except instead of have an image burned into the screen images persist in a ghosting kind of effect.
>>52497141
Samsung sucks balls, speak for yourself if you want that overpriced trash.
>>52497180
Literally a non issue
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PkQJkH1tOg
>>52497210
Fuck you shill
The whites in my s5 have a yellow tint in them that makes it look dirty. Fuck amoled I'm going back to Apple.
>>52497306
>Fuck amoled I'm going back to Apple
Apple will probably move to AMOLED just as soon as samsung lets them buy panels.
>>52497289
It is an issue if you have to go through that process to take it out. And I'm the retard here? kek
>>52496640
your cuticles are a mess m8
>>52497342
I'm going to buy a 6s, it is by far faster than Samsung new generation of devices so I'm going to be fine
>>52497389
hurr durr OP
why isnt my edge like this?
why do you faggots insist on taking things to the extreme and then showing it off as normal.
furries and anime is shit.
>>52497399
http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/antutu-iphone-6s-best-performing-smartphone/
>being this brainwashed
>>52497461
Lol, the way you're posting links and always mention apple, it's obvious you already own an iphone. Any normal person if they were specifically dissatisfied with Samsung would move on to LG, Sony, Nexus, Etc.
>>52497083
>He bought a phone without physical buttons
>>52497493
LOL Sony and nexus have the same shitty problem with their amoled screens which is the reason for why I hate so much my phone. LG doesn't have this problem so I will probably give it a try, only reason for why I want to stay with Android devices is because cotumisation but it doesn't worth it if your screen will look like shit after a while (and yes, I know there are exceptions but it seems like the majority of phones with amoled screens experience problems with their displays).
>>52497569
>Sony
Sony uses IPS LCD you dipshit.
Literally the only company who produces AMOLED displays is samsung, and they only share with a few people.
>>52497461
I'd like to see the full breakdown of points if I could. We all know the iPhone6S is fast, it's killing chips that were released after the iPhone6, but Antutu does a range of tests and it would be interesting to see if it is excelling in particular areas or across the board.
If you've got a 6S then do an Antutu bench and post the expanded results.
>>52497587
Kek then it's LG who make phones with that shifty oled display then. I will try Sony although I've heard their build quallity is shit
Reee get out Sam
>>52496671
i work at best buy. it's on 24/7.
>>52497632
Will most likely buy one, but I will give android devices one last opportunity to not disappoint me
>>52497701
If you're disappointed by current gen Android devices then you're no more than a shill.
>>52497672
>then it's LG who make phones with that shifty oled display then
LG makes OLED displays, but i believe the only recent smartphone OLED display they have put out was the LG G Flex 2. The G2, G3, G4 and V10 were all LCD.
Literally the only AMOLED displays out right now are from samsung, either in Samsung devices, or in a few select other devices (mainly smaller manufacturers like Meizu, Gionee, ZTE, Oppo, Huawei, etc).
>>52497762
>AU Optronics
okay
>>52497827
Name a device that you can purchase that uses an AU Optronics OLED or AMOLED display.
>>52497587
Sony makes some ultra expensive (10~30k usd) amoled displays for hospitals
>>52497672
lg makes p-oled, while its more resistant to burn in than amoled, the screen is grainy as hell.
>>52497859
*that isn't a TV or similar sized dispaly
>>52497859
HTC One S
>>52497884
... lol okay, name a phone from the last year or so.
>>52497026
nice shoop
>>52497884
>Name a device that you can purchase
>540x960 resolution
>Released 2012, April
riiiiiiight, well come back when you have found a phone that is actually being produced and available for sale new.
>>52497893
Nexus 6p
>>52497859
Huawei Watch
Also Everdisplay makes OLED as well for phones/wearables.
>>52497914
That uses a samsung AMOLED panel...
>>52496710
yeah guys, I don't see any burn-in here
>>52497210
>overpriced trash
Now your talking about Apple
>>52497923
My point wasn't that alternatives don't exist, but literally 95%+ of the AMOLED market is samsung panels. Especially as far as cell phone displays are concerned.
>>52497893
There's speculation that the next iphone will use AU AMOLED displays
>they dont stare at a picture of their waifu for 16 hours a day.
baka senpai
>>52497957
I doubt they have the production facilities for that kind of volume desu.
>>52497965
My waifu is burned into all of my displays.
>>52496710
Are you baiting? Problems with the screen hardware itself won't be visible in a screenshot, you dummy.
>>52497987
Very good.
>>52497981
ok i was wrong there's a rumor that Apple is investing in them for an iphone 3+ years from now
>>52497017
nice gmask faget
>>52498062
That I could believe, as it would take that long to get a new production facility set up for Next-gen AMOLED production on the scale needed for apple.
You need to take a degaussing rod to that sucker. fix it right up!
>>52497017
Did you drop this to get Missingno. or something
>>52496640
>tfw just bought the S6
Did I get meme'd?
What is it with the extremely ardent defending of Samsung in here? Some people are treating this thread as if it's a fight to the death for Samsung's honor
>>52498263
No. I have an original Note that has no burn in after 3 years of use.
Protip: having the screen brightness on full and the screen on 24/7 for weeks is bad for it, but that isn't typical usage.
>>52498263
You're a little late to the party, Anon.
>>52496640
> burn in screen
what is this 1989?
>>52498263
No anon, you're fine. People have been buying samsung AMOLEDs for years and only a small portion of users ever report burn in, and it's mainly from them being retarded and leaving it at max brightness for months on end because they dont know how to change the brightness or set it to auto brightness.
>>52498263
No, I have a Galaxy s4 and there is no burn in, just dont keep it on 24 hours a day like a display unit
>>52498391
but doing so turns me on. 24/7 or bust
>>52496879
>using the smiley with a carat nose
>>52498282
Samsung is the iPhone of Android, they are just committing post-purchase rationalization for spending the most possible cash on a flagship
>>52498263
I've had my s6 since it was realesed, I always keep the brightness level of my screen below the middle of its full potential and I'm starting to see a burn area in my status bar (this probably due to the fact that the status bar is always there), every device is different but if you're worried about it maybe you should consider other options
WOW OP VERY VERY VERY NICE TROLLING SKILLS BRO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHO LEAVES THE SAME IMAGE ON THEIR PHONE FOR 50 HOURS STRAIGHT ON HIGH BRIGHTNESS?!? LOOOOOL!!!
Do IPS Displays have this problem?
>>52498773
No, only OLED displays have burn in
>>52498007
is this yoko?
>>52498992
Mackie. She's my wife.
>>52498992
>>52498773
No, they have image persistence problems which occur under the same circumstances.
>>52499013
>>52499015
i only just started watching anime
>>52499015
>>52499047
>>52499098
>>52499111
>>52497083
My S5 does this when I turn the brightness down low, but it flickers, not sure what to do about it.
>>52496731
My shitty LED destroy the colors of your shitty note5, and for the black levels i honestly could not care less, being able to max the brightness and display shit for as long as i want without worry is priority.
>>52496683
> burn in doesn't affect all screens
>>52499142
>>52499215
Only organic crap is affected by burn ins, AMOLED, OLED, you name it.
I'm going to weigh in on AMOLED burn-in. I bought a used Note II in November 2013 and stopped using it in December 2015. I had between 4-6 hours Screen on Time every day for those two years. For the last two months I could barely see burn-in with a grey screen at minimum brightness. The status bar was slightly brighter, with darker spots where the notification icons and clock were. I really miss AMOLED screens and regret buying a Z3 Compact over a Galaxy Alpha.
>>52499235
You are wrong. Hth
>>52499212
>My shitty LED destroy the colors of your shitty note5
Kek, i'd love to see that.
The Note5 is one of the most accurate displays ever put in a smartphone ya dip.
>>52499235
CRTs get burn in
Plasmas get burn in
Any LCD can get burn in
Get real
>>52499250
My iPhone 6S Plus doesn't have this problem.
>>52499302
it's also got half as many pixels.
Been using an s5 since it came out and the screen is still perfect
It's shit for a lot of other reasons but screen isnt one
>>52496671
Which is the best way to simulate 1-2 years worth of usage, so its a good example of what you'll end up with later on down the line
firefox android > chrome android
>>52499348
Except it isn't because with normal use even 3 years later an AMOLED screen will look nothing like the OP.
>>52499300
>>52499348
>Leaving your smartphone screen on 100% brightness with the same image for multiple hours/days/whatever is exactly the same as regular usage with variable backlight lighting, using different menus, turning screen off regularly
Yeah sure faggot
Bought an S5 release-day and still have not had a single issue with the screen
>>52499422
Tactical Samsung Defense Task Force has arrived
>>52499437
>he's still going for it
You've got it all wrong, I'm actually an NVIDIA shill.
Anyways all I'm saying is as a long time user of the S5, burn-in is hardly an issue. I'm sure you could burn it in if you tried, but if you're using your phone like a normal person and not leaving the same image on for 24 hours, you'll never encounter it.
Seriously, just keep a display off timer on and you'll never need to worry.
Had my s3 for 3 years, quite a few hours of screen on every day. All of those 3 years I had a black status bar.
Looking at a completely white picture, I can see some extremely faint burn in. Only in a dark room.
>>52499509
I have a g4 now, and I honestly miss the blacks, saturation and viewing angles quite a bit.
>>52497079
The only thing Samsung does good in is plain bench marks in the higher priced phones
>s6 vs galaxy grand prime speed/ram allocation test
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KOH0QXRSriA
>S6 edge vs lg g4 camera test
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kG-Fg4upxZw
>note 5 eats up battery life while idling and is not user replaceable
>doesn't include micro SD card
Samsung might as well be called apple 2 with a bite taken out of the other side
>>52499534
Had a G3, literally no issues.
Upgraded to a G4, touch screen issues, boot loop issues, rainbow snow half screen issues. What went wrong.
>>52499586
>The only thing Samsung does good in is plain bench marks
Nah, I don't have a samsung, but thier CPUs and displays are top.
Their software isn't bad either, but they are very locked down, and the battery is terrible on the s6. And now locked down hardware too, yes.
>>52499591
No problems with mine, other than it getting kinda hot when snapchat is left open. But the display can't get close to a amoled, kinda sad about sammy phones being too locked down to buy.
>>52499348
That isn't how burn in works.
>>52496671
>justifying shit technology
Why doesn't IPS+ have this problem, samshill?
>>52499250
cannot create link
link already exists
>>52500537
Because it uses an inferior technology.
Organic LEDs might have burn in, but they are superior in almost every other way, and they are improving in quality much faster than LCD tech.
>>52500582
you can post your meme graphs and sources but IPS+ still looks better than amoled and retains quality as the device ages
besides, amoled is gimped oled anyway. That's why they can afford to put it in samshits
>>52500615
Keep on talking out of your ass, you might call them meme graphs, but I call it accurate measurements.
Fact is AMOLED surpassed LCD tech in early 2015, and by the end of 2016 it wont even be a contest, power draw, color accuracy, black levels, etc, AMOLED is superior at this point.
That and as I already said, AMOLED tech has been advancing at a MUCH faster pace than LCD tech, and AMOLED tech doesn't appear to be slowing down in the improvements as VR headsets look to be set on using them for the foreseeable future in around the same size panel as is required by smartphones.
ITT: OLED early adopters on denial
>>52500652
OLED is the future
LCD is the present
Amoled is OLED's retarded brother that Samshit can afford to throw on its garbage cell phones
Please don't get Amoled confused with OLED just because they share some of the same drawbacks. Amoled still looks like shit in 2016 relative to good LCD panels.
>>52500724
educate yourself please
>http://www.anandtech.com/show/9558/the-samsung-galaxy-note5-and-galaxy-s6-edge-review/3
>>52500724
>With this generation of AMOLED, Samsung has definitely equaled the best LCDs on the market. I suspect within the next year or two it will be inevitable that Samsung AMOLED will be clearly superior to even the best LCDs. However, without other OLED suppliers that can provide similar quality and cost I suspect OEM adoption will continue to be limited.
>>52496683
Yeah it does, using an LG phone with an LCD display and burnin happens all the time.
>>52496710
>>52496640
>falling for the smartphone meme
top kek, told you not to buy a smartphone.
>>52496640
Note 4 here.
A whole year with about 6 hours SoT every day and it's still fine
