>amoled
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
>amoled
>>52473579
And people think that buying a 130$ Xiaomi is stupid while this is happening to the 500$ Shitsungs.
>>52473579
Yeah, we knew Amoled is a meme. What else is knew...
I told you guys countless of times not to get amoled phones. That's why I got an LCD phone, even though it's worse in terms of display quality, it will last longer. Amoleds are for people who like to burn money in just one year or less just to have the latest and baddest tech.
Planned obsolescence, pham.
>>52473579
>that font
why the fuck do people do this?
>>52473920
It's a display phone in a store, people will naturally have messed with it
>>52473920
>"because it reflects my personality anon, I'm quirky and fun! what font do you use?"
>>52473579
>Samshit
>>52473974
It's not just people dicking with it, I see loads of Smasnug owners set that stupid font. It's like the comic sans of android phones
Also this
>>52473981
>>52473981
I use a good looking font to reflect the fact that I'm handsome
>>52473981
T-the same one
>>52473579
Sam si kriv jer koristis taj odvratan font.
>>52473981
What a qt.
>>52474055
>tfw she probably uses gtk
>>52473981
>>52473981
Been using the Ubuntu font for months and don't even realize it anymore
>>52473920
It's part of the samsung :^) experience.
>>52473579
>>52474049
hrvatska JE SRBIJA
>>52474049
Nisam Android plebejac
>>52473981
Who is this semen demon?
>>52474105
>;)
>>52473579
taking a picture of a probably frozen samsung demo loop to prove that they can suffer from burn in is retarded. Whether they can when you display the same thing on them for 3 months at maximum brightness 24/7 is not relevant. Whether they do it in day to day use it.
That being said in current gen AMOLED devices that I've owned I do see some slight status bar burn in.
>>52473579
ha! pusi kurac
>>52474062
>15%
Ya know every time you drop below ten you shorten your battery life. Better hurry!
>>52474154
And that isnt every day use? Lmao my buddy
Braco, pa tko nas zavadi?
>>52473579
vratia se šime! DI JE BIA?!
B R A V O S A M S U N G
R
A
V
O
>>52474344
Ajde pajdo gledaj Hajduka i mici se odavde
>>52473981
Ubuntu font. Also I was wrong in my judgment of you. I am disappointed by my lack of this ability. Goodbye.
>>52474154
Been using my sgs3 daily for over three years now and there's no burn in or fade at all. What are people doing that damages these screens?
>>52474590
I dailied the S3 for almost two years...
>broke the headphone jack
>cracked the screen two times
>burned the camera
>letters fell out of the back cover
>both batteries shat themselves
>status bar burn in
>got hot as fuck
eh
My s4 active's display completely shit itself a few months ago. It didn't just burn in, it completely distorted my screen with shit left and right on top of the normal burn in. The part was only about $50 to replace but that's still retarded.
>>52473579
dat burn
>>52474301
I've had my note 5 since before launch and it has zero burn in after 5 months. Use auto brightness and you're fine as long as yof don't use max brightness for hours on end like the display model in the OP and you're fine.
>>52474752
I blame myself for having the brightness maxed for all 3 years I've owned it.
>>52474790
Are you joking? My brightness never comes down from top. I've never had it.
That is no excuse for a shit panel.
>>52474801
If you use an AMOLED panel at max brightness the only one to blame is yourself desu senpaitachi
>>52474271
Is this true?
>>52473579
Yeah, had a great experience with Samshit with the S2 long ago
Amoled, never again
Samshit, never again
S3 here with amoled, its fucking perfect as new, maybe that guy shouldn't let the phone on displaying the same image for days.
>>52474897
>implying screen technologies that aren't cheap gookshit like amoled would have this problem
Stop trying to justify inferior technology
>>52473981
URW Gothic, Courier New and Terminus for console.
>>52474922
Im not justifying anything, Im posting how my phone is working now, after 4 years, and plenty of others anon with S2 phone have the same experience, zero issues with the screen.
Look on the archives, this guys keep posting the same shit every week or so, of course not all anons are here at all times.
>>52474922
>Stop trying to justify inferior technology
Is that why all the best TVs in the world are OLED?
>>52474105
svrbe na vrbe
>>52474062
Needs to be smaller. The clock and the percentage in the status bar look weird.
>>52474922
>inferior technology
OLED tech surpassed LCDs in almost every respect around 10-12 months ago. In another year OLEDs will be far superior as OLED research and advancement is far outpacing LCDs right now.
>>52474858
Not really.
Each time a phone charges to 100% (could be in one charge, could be 50% when charging twice, as long as it adds up to 100%), it completes a charge cycle.
After 500 (maybe after 2 years; it's an estimate) charge cycles, the lithium ion battery has deteriorated enough to replace.
>but muh full charge cycle
A full cycle (0 to 100 in one charge session) is a meme from the Nickel-Cadmium days.
Tl;dr
A drop under 10% doesn't harm the battery.
>>52474978
>zero issues with the screen.
Except that Amoled is a shit technology that has had issues with burn in with many people for many years, not only one autist on /g/
Samshit can't into display tech. It's as simple as that. The color accuracy, black levels, and brightness is relatively shit for the price samshit charges for their flagships. I'm not even talking about all the defects
>>52474989
>>52475042
I'm talking about Amoled, never once did I mention or hint at OLED. If you got the implication that gook screen technologies means everything that ever came out of Asia then you seem to have misunderstood.
>>52474105
>implikacije
>>52475106
>implying AMOLED and OLED research and development aren't the same thing
Oh okay buddy.
>>52473857
>>52473579
poorfag general
>>52475106
>The color accuracy, black levels, and brightness is relatively shit for the price samshit charges for their flagships
Nigger what?
The note 5 panel was the highest testing panel displaymate had ever tested in a phone.
http://www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_Note5_ShootOut_1.htm
Color accuracy, black levels, etc, all top of the score boards compared to anything else
>>52475180
Protip, they're not even close. Just because they sound close in your retarded mind doesn't mean they are related. Screen tech research overlaps at certain points. OLED and AMOLED might suffer from similar drawbacks. Doesn't mean they are related or at the same quality level. There is a reason why OLED costs money and AMOLED is mass produced into Samshit phones
>>52475049
it's in fact better for lithium-ion batteries to be charged only after being emptied of any energy , which is the opposite of most other kind of batteries (lead etc...) which shouldn't be emptied before recharge.
>>52475282
>displaymate
Looks like a no name site stuck in the 2000s
If you didn't have Samsung's corporate cum in your eyes you could easily see how IPS+ is superior to Amoled garbage
Amoled is a shit!
>>52475494
>Looks like a no name site stuck in the 2000s
It's been around for 2 decades and is an industry leaders in evaluating and comparing LCD, OLED, LED, LCoS, Plasma, DLP, CRT displays.
You're literally retarded if you think you can just dismiss their testing because you haven't personally heard of them.
Good damage control for your obvious anti samsung ahilling.
>>52474752
The S4 Active has an LCD panel, retard.
>>52473579
Amoled is a automatic drop for me.
>>52475692
That explains why it was so cheap to replace then. It still shit itself on me and had burn in issues
>>52475895
What will you do when apple starts using it?
>>52475895
Better start getting used to it. In 2-3 years it'll probably be standard. Only reason it isn't right now is Samsung isn't producing panels for most people.
>>52475565
Sorry, I go by how a display looks to me and the amount of issues that it has been known to have over its development, not what some stupid faggot links on an archaic site that they claim is an industry leader in evaluating screen tech. If they were valuable in the display industry then they would present themselves as such and would be cited by everyone, not one Samshit shill.
>>52473920
Why the fuck would you care about somebody else's font choices you insecure little bitch?
>>52476009
>Standard
I don't use standards. I use the best option which is not amoshit
>>52476079
It's a company mainly focused on providing feed back directly to manufacturers, they aren't particularly oriented towards consumer journalism, hence the article I linked you to having a lot of indepth technical analysis without much explanation for normies.
>>52475155
>glupi zabo-postovljac
>>52474107
enjoying webms and downloading gifs
