So why haven't you all upgraded to at least a 980ti by this point? You can easily sell them as soon as Pascal comes out. It's so not looking good for AMD.
>>52472115
Planning on upgrading my rig to a 980 ti and ASUS PG278Q in a week to get dat 1440p g-sync 144hz experience
>>52472115
How are you going to be selling a 980Ti when pascal comes out when everyone is buying pascal
I mean, there can't be THAT many stupid people, surely?
I mean, there can't be THAT many stupid people with money, surely?
>>52472190
You must be poor. Nothing wrong with wanting the best.
8-D
My 570 works just fine
the most demanding game i play is dorf fort
i dont need no fucking gtx
>>52472158
>Single 980ti
>1440p at 144fps
Yeah nah
I upgraded to Pascal this week. One trip to Home Depot and a screw driver did the trick much to my astonishment.
>>52472223
Exactly and the best is pascal
Are you so poor you need to rely on selling your old graphics card?
If you don't have four 980Ti's you're a plebeian casual that should just stay out of the hobby.
>>52472277
What do you recommend senpai
>>52472115
I have two 980 Ti's. I'm not going to get Pascal until 6-8 months after release because all the best models of a graphics card don't come out until way after launch. The exception this time was the Gigabyte G1 980 Ti which is damn good and came out close to launch.
>>52472343
TWO 980Ti.
>>52472115
10 Rupees have been deposited to your designated paid shill account.
>>52472403
Gee,senpai idk. Seems like overkill. But if it lets me turn on hair works in witcher 3 I'll do it.
>>52472311
>stay out of the hobby
what hobby is that?
Being a useless leach on society who simulates life instead of living it?
>>52472477
Yes.
>>52472115
How is it not looking so good for AMD, specifically?
>>52472477
You should play video games maximally just like you do everything else. Or do you just not have appreciation for fine art?
>>52472528
They made so power efficient laptop gpu.
>>52472647
I thought AMD currently had the upcoming GPU with a dramatically decreased TDP with the 14nm transition?
>>52472681
Yeah. Should be good for mobile devices.
>>52472647
retard
>>52472681
Nvidia are going to release their 16nm chips which will be around the same p/w as the polaris stuff which is coming. It's only good news for consumers after being stuck on this 28nm ride for ever.
>>52472297
Are you referring to >woodscrews
?
>>52472115
cause my 660 is fine for my 1440x900 screen
>>52472720
Are you autistic?
>>52472540
>You should play video games maximally
It doesn't take a 980ti for that
>>52472115
Already got two EVGA 980 Ti Kingpins
Can't wait for Pascal, my setup will kick the living shit out of whatever they release
>>52472741
https://semiaccurate.com/2009/10/01/nvidia-fakes-fermi-boards-gtc/
What does autism have to do with anything I posted ?
Guys, I could buy a ''used'' R9 Fury (non x) for 460€. It was returned to the store by a previous Customer but hasn't been in use. Warranty until 2018.
I could also buy a 980 (non ti) for the same price. I'm not exactly sure which one to get. They're pretty similar performance wise, but only if you overclock the living shit out of the 980. The Fury was only OC'd slightly in the benchmarks that I saw (partially duo to not being able to OC higher)
Pic related is my current rig. I think the only thing I need to change right now is the GPU. I'm going to college again and will most likely make much less money, so what would be the better option if I want to use it for at least 3-4 years. Currently using a 1080p panel, but I wanna either go with 4k or jump on the VR train once it comes down in price in one or two years.
>>52472903
You can buy a brand new one for the same price in France and Germany.
Do you think you can wait 5 more months for Pascal ? If not, then pull the trigger
Gaming hardware belongs on /v/.
>>52472962
>You can buy a brand new one for the same price in France and Germany.
missread, nope you can't nvm
>>52472903
Get the 980. AMD driver issues is not just a meme.
>>52472903
I have a R9 290 (a worse card than both of those) and desu I couldn't ask for more. I would personally go for the Fury if I couldn't afford a 980ti.
>>52472873
Yep, autist spotted. Not even him.
>>52472115
>So why haven't you all upgraded to at least a 980ti by this point?
I BELIEVE IN AMD
>>52472989
except it is a meme, one that you fell for
>>52472115
Do we have any news on the release of the GTX 1000 series yet?
I want to upgrade for my Rift preorder, but if the card wont be out for another year, I might just cave and get a 970 in the mean time...
>900 series
>no direct x 12 support
ok
>>52472115
I don't game, and it would be a downgrade from the GTX 960 as far as HTPC capabilities are concerned.
>>52474860
>DirectX 12 feature level 12_1
>compared to AMD's feature level 12_0
>>52474940
>>52472115
>Having a dedicated gpu
>Gaming one at that
>>>/v/
>>52475107
This. Only acceptable dGPU is a Quadro or a Tesla.
>>52472350
??? The Ti came out in 2015 nigger.
>>52472256
What model? I had the Palit one for a bit and man that thing sounds like a plane
>>52475066
>Video can't be played because the file is corrupt.
My IP has been logged, hasn't it?
>>52472903
The fury slaughters a 980. The gap widens even more once you up the resolution.
>unabashed marketing thread
wew
>>52475897
You can't overclock the Fury though.
There's a massive gap between reference 980 shown on your benchmark (which nobody buys because it's more expensive) to an non-reference overclocked 980.
![1384493098899[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/qtaAKYB.jpg "1384493098899[1].jpg")
>tfw tech power is stagnated
>will be able to play games at max with my 780 for years to come
>gonna stay behind in the display revolution while bleeding edge kiddies finance it by buying expensive, flawed placebo monitors with resolutions and refresh rates no current GPU can run
>in five years I'll get myself a 120 hz, fully buzzword-compliant 4k ips screen for $3-400
>>52476089
>BF3
oh not this again.
>>52472796
You're right, it takes four. Then once the next generation comes out you throw your 980Tis in the garbage and get faster stuff.
>>52476165
What else are they supposed to use? BF3 is an AMD title.
If they bench using a more recent title the chances are it'll be a gameworks titles like the majority of the games today and you AMD users will cry foul play. The Fury will get demolished because of the piss poor tessellation performance.
>>52476293
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Gigabyte/GTX_980_Ti_Waterforce/7.html
At least get a recent chart. Hint: the fury is faster pretty much across the board than a 980.
charts
>>52476348
Only the reference 980 is shown.
Are you saying the Fury can only compete with a reference 980?
>selling your last-gen card at a loss instead of waiting for a mere 6 months max
>>52476293
Why not BF4 or Battlefront if you want an amd sponsored game? But Fury>980
>>52476392
It's not me that want it. I didn't complain about it. The other guy has a problem with BF3 for some reason.
Also you can get a 980 for around $350~ on sale now. The Fury still goes for $500. AMD can't compete.
>>52476372
It doesn't compete with the 980 at all - its a faster card. The 390x is the 980 competitor.
>>52476437
>fury is faster
>costs more
are you seriously trying to get people to shill out for 970/980s still?
the smart people saved their money and are going to drop it on next gen and there's nothing you can do about it, jew
>>52476141
i dont think ips will cost $-397 any time soon fäm
just got a 980ti a few days ago. and a monitor with g-sync, everything is so smooth
>>52476488
No.
Let's just say *IF* the Fury is faster (it isn't), it's still not worth $100~$150 over the 980.
If you gave the slightest amount of effort you can grab a $400 980 on sale easily. I have never seen a Fury go anywhere close to that.
>>52476544
This. AMD has been obsolete for the past few years, only delusional fanboys buy their products at this point.
When is Pascal, anyway?
I don't have $600 to drop in one shot
>>52476625
After Polaris
>>52476544
>(it isn't)
Go for the faggot setup... G-Sync...lamo geforce shit reloaded.
>>52476637
Yeah, but when?
>>52476656
After Polaris
Didn't know nvidia employees worked weekends!
>>52476683
When is Polaris?
>inb4 before Pascal
>>52476765
Whenever AMD releases Vulkan
>>52476779
Will Vulkan work with Nvidia cards?
>>52472115
Theres no need to. All I play is
DOD:S, CS:S, Dota 2, & Tf2
I'm fine with my 750ti
>>52472873
>>52474290
Look this one
>https://semiaccurate.com/2015/05/31/nvidia-finally-outs-the-980ti/
''So what is Nvidia launching? The GTX980Ti is nothing more than the high bin 980, this time it is clocked at an even 1GHz. Several variants are being touted by the normal AIB set with top shelf ‘Press Edition’ parts hitting ~1250MHz or so. OEMs are expecting 75-100MHz boost/turbo speeds on the low end, 100+MHz on the press variants. Everything else should be the same as the non-Ti 980s, it isn’t the big Maxwell the BS rumor sites listed a while ago, it is just what we said it was last year.S|A''
This website is shit
>>52476820
Most likely. Most AMD technology is open source after all.
>>52472903
Get the Fury. If you get a good chip you might even be able to unlock it to a fully Fury-X.
>http://wccftech.com/howto-checking-r9-fury-unlock-full-fury/
>>52476883
So what month/quarter is Pascal?
>>52477047
Q1 2017
>>52477052
Lies! They said Q2/3 2016!
>>52472989
except it is a meme
source: AMD drivers without raptr
I just bought a 380X.
>>52476590
AMD is superior to Nvidia until you hit >$300 territory.
Don't fucking try to argue that the 960 is better than the 380 or that the 950 is good at all, we both know that's simply not true.
Will a 780 ti or 970 be relevant in 2 years time?
>>52474973
No card out right now is fully compatible with DX12
http://wccftech.com/amd-confirms-gcn-cards-feature-full-directx-12-support-feature-level-111-gcn-10-feature-level-120-gcn-1112/
>twenty sixteen
>having a desktop computer
get a job
.
>>52477608
The 780ti isn't relevant now given the gimping Nvidia has given it.
>>52472115
>It's so not looking good for AMD.
Polaris prototypes are said to be Star Wars Battlefield 3 maxed out using only 60W (that is with a low-range gddr5 cards), so I dunno about that.
What should I do with my 970?
>>52477937
Give it to me.
