if you were wondering how the 390x compares to the 290x at 1080p, then here is a good comparison.
>>52447538
Moral of the story: get Nvidia
>>52447696
moral of the story: Get what gives you the best performance for your given budget.
>>52447538
They'll work out the drivers issues at some point, in any case the gap widens at higher resolutions
Moral of the story: stop playing shit games like fallout holy shit you guys have bad taste
>>52447735
>falling for the 4k meme
>>52447713
Aka, an Nvidia card. AMD's GPUs aren't competitive. Get used to it AMDrone
>>52447739
whatever your taste is, a modern game like fallout 4 is likely to be indicative of the performances of these cards in the vast majority of games
>>52447750
How retarded are you?
>>52447761
Oh look the 390X beat out the 970 at 1440p even with Nvidia's optimization
>>52447739
>stop liking what I don't like
I'm not saying it's good because it's popular, but that doesn't make it bad either.
>>52447783
>How retarded are you?
none
>>52447783
The 290x rebrand is supposed to be against the 980, nice try poorfag
>>52447761
Shit you don't even want to know what happens when the Tessellation heavy god rays are turned off
Seriously though I have no idea what's happening at the 1080p tests
>>52447801
It's $100 less than a 980
>>52447799
then why would you use that word which must not be spoken, also 4k is about productivity, not games
>>52447783
See, I don't get this; the 390x is drawing 70% more pixels, but only loses 15% performance.
>>52447818
It's still in the same tier dumbass
>>52447783
970 has higher minimum fps in that benchmark and is much cheaper, you're not helping your case
>>52447837
the 390 would be on it's level, and outperform it in most other games that aren't optimized for nvidia
>>52447807
Why the fuck is the bar so much bigger over 5fps..
>>52447824
I mean I guess I do considering Bethesda games are generally low poly count, and the shader pipeline isn't strictly per pixel so it's the same amount of work all the way up to the pixel shaders. But still, the 970 loses a quarter of its performance for the same load.
Does that mean AMD is objectively better at pixel shaders?
>>52447824
AMD's architecture is more suited to higher resolutions, part that, part much larger memory bus, isn't it 512 on the 390s?
>>52447696
>fell for the Nvidia marketing meme
Kek
My brother is sending me his old gtx 760 for my first build. Where do you guys think it would fit on the list?
>>52447981
Below a 270 obviously
>>52447987
K. Wasn't sure if it simply went by the numbers
As an owner of a fury x, they left it off the list because it would've cucked the list. If I put my shit on ultra at 1080p easy average 95 - 100 fps
Nice graph op. I'll just pretend that 970 doesn't exist. Why would I want the same or better performance, better min frames, better drivers, physx, shadowplay, game stream, vr support, mfaa, low power consumption, quieter cooling, and free AAA titles with my purchase for a cheaper price anyway?
>>52447998
because you don't want 3.5+0.5
>>52447998
Oh look another person who fell for the Nvidia marketing meme
>>52447995
check'd then kek'd
>>52448105
Funny how that graph is witcher 3 vs fallout 4 and on 4k vs 1080p. Good comparison
>>52448105
Yeah, I'm not a fan of AMD but you are actually retarded and should learn to read the post you quoted
>>52448105
>different game
>much higher res
Kek
>>52448105
>he posts a reply of 4k red on a game made solely for nvidia cards
>>52448222
>>52448195
>>52448192
>>52448163
kek
>>52448246
Posting benchmarks for one is a meme
But posting different games, different res, different settings and ones from different people is just sad. You're too poor to afford a 980ti-H or a Fury X. So why even post other peoples shit
>>52448660
>>>/anhero/
>>52447987
Only just below a 270x (the card I have) actually. I know because I looked over a lot of benchmarks before I pulled the trigger on it.
>>52447768
>fallout 4
>modern game
holy fuck you are retarded
>>52448974
why do you think it looks so good
>>52448996
probably because the engine is from 2002, graphics were super good back then
>>52447801
>The 290x rebrand is supposed to be against the 980, nice try poorfag
And it performs equally, when you don't cherry pick games
>>52449011
>games is as old as inception of its engine
is this memes?
>>52447807
>Tessellation heavy god rays
Is this a new meme?
>>52449564
that's literally what they are
>>52449587
why don't they call them 'meme rays' then?
having Nitro 390 it's obliterating anything with nvidia goyworks turned off
no drivers problems, cool, quiet
enjoy your 3.5 / 4.
>>52449667
kek'd at the Damage-control ITP
>>52449667
>lowering the graphics quality
>claiming victory
>>52449706
>>52449727
back to /v/ retards
>them minimums on the 970 and 980.
>>52447538
Well damn that sucks for AMD. But what about DirectX 12?
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9740/directx-12-geforce-plus-radeon-mgpu-preview/4
>>52449866
Here's an updated DX12 benchmark
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9659/fable-legends-directx-12-benchmark-analysis/2
>>52449727
>64x tesselation
Is tessellation a new epic meme?
>>52449951
>TessMark
>HOLY SHIT WHY IS IT USING SO MUCH TESSELLATION
>>52449965
>TessMark
MemeMark
>>52449979
That's clever
>>52447801
I'm pretty sure the Fury is the card to pit against the 980. And it stomps it on all fronts.
>inb4 no bcs its more expensive
Thats because its better.
>>52449898
What about Fable Legends BenchMark?
http://www.overclock3d.net/articles/gpu_displays/fable_legends_dx12_benchmark_-_amd_vs_nvidia/1
>>52447538
So basically it doesn't fucking matter very much...yeah I kinda figured.
*sigh*
The AMD catalyst/crimson suite has a tesselation limiter built into it that can take nivida gameworks features and prevent them from over-tessellating.
All you have to do is set the limiter to x16 and your AMD card will run any gameworks game like fallout4 or witcher3 with hairworks and godrays set to maximum and the FPS will be higher than an equivalent nvidia GPU with those same settings turned on
thats literally all you have to do and because that isnt done in these benchmarks they are automatically invalid because they are using x64 tessellation that gives you no visual improvement in game but cuts performance on both AMD and nvidia GPU's
nvidia not having a limiter in geForce to match AMD's limiter is a real shot in the dick of their customers too
>>52450235
Its really sad that we can't even trust benchmarks anymore
>>52450235
Where do you set the limiter? Are you sure x16 isn't too much?
i learnt something here today grills and boys.
>>52450235
>features
diplomatic way of saying "Shit we put in the game specifically to fuck AMD users"
and yes, pic related is a tesselated water table. That you never see. But is still rendered.
>>52449825
>61
>61
Nothing wrong here.
>>52450385
Holy shit, doesn't that also affect the performance of nvidia gpus?
>>52450332
There is Zero difference between x32 and x64 tesselation even at 4K resolution I have actually check with a fucking magnifying glass and it isnt there.
there is some noticeable difference between x16 and x32 but its minuscule and the FPS boost you get from x16 trumps the slightly better quality of hair effects and light particles.
>>52450353
go to the bottom corner of your desktop and click on the little red icon you will either get a catalyst or Crimson style menu depending on what drivers you have If its CCC (control center) just go to game settings and scroll down to force tessellation in applications and check the box and set to x16
In crimson you set the profile for each game you have installed so go to games and click on the game you want to tweak and then set tesselation for that game. instead of forcing the setting for all games it will only set it for that specific game you can even set Overclocking profiles so certain demanding games overclock your GPU by a certain ammount with the power settings pre-set and on other games is just runs stock a really handy upgrade from AMD
>>52447538
>980ti only 6% faster than 980
great benchmark.
>>52450436
yes it does but it fucks AMD cards more which is precisely why they do it. As a direct result of this happening in Crysis2 i beleive AMD implemented a tesselation limiter to allow AMD users to get around this.
You have no equivalent feature in your Nvidia Drivers so even though they can run it better than AMD you do not have the option to prevent it to improve performance like the AMD users can
its extremely fucked up
>>52450235
>invalidates
it doesn't. nVidia cards run at the same settings and get better results. You might say game is biased, but bench isn't invalid. Your way is invalid, cards should not get any special treatment in benchamrks.
>>52450353
x16 isn't too much. You can actually see the difference if you look closely even between x32 and x64 in games like Witcher 3. x32 is more or less optimal for fast moving games, x16 if you can't push mightr is fine, don't go any lower.
In crimson gameing-game you want to edit-tesseletion mode
>>52450451
that is reaching the point of CPU botteneck hence the small difference
>>52450451
fallout 4 is a clusterfuck of bad game design people are experience massive framedrops using intel i5's because the faggots at bethesda never optimized the draw calls and sscheduling for a 4-core 4-thread CPU they build the engine for the 8-core(two disabled) jaquar AMD cpu in the consoles so when the 4-threads are used up the game loads the extra tasks and calls from the extra 2 threads in a fucked up order on the four cores and causes bad timings and huge idle gaps.
also the game over renders shadow texturemaps which causes massive FPS drops in the city for both Nvidia and AMD GPU's
bethesda is just a fucking terrible game developer like EA levels of terrible
>Buy Nvidia, goy!
>Trust benchmarks, goy!
>What do you mean you caught us tesselating the absolute shit out of one of the most common objects in a game? N-no it was an accident
>>52450511
good news is that the next gen Polaris Architecture from AMD releasing Summer/fall of this year is going to force major changes in the way nvidia does buisness.
>>52450540
are you implying AMD lacks competitive products right now? because it's untrue.
>>52450684
there products are competative but the the advancements they are making for the next series is a major performance changer in the market. And Nvidia pascale got delayed so they will beat them to market.
the most important upgrades are Zen/Polaris APU's which will completely upset the Mobile market and getting those APU's into next gen game consoles so that the grapics standards of videogames goes up
>>52447538
>>52447783
>>52450506
Are the frighteningly low FPS scores on the 960 and similar models because of poor optimization for PC or bottlenecking?
I mean, that's a big leap from the 960 to the 970, but then again it's a ~$140 spread price-wise too.
>>52450892
the gtx 960 is a comically bad design its got fewer CUDA cores than the 760 and it only has a 128-bit memory bus.
the cuda cores arent an issue so much as the memory but that tiny fucker throttles at 1080p and makes it impossible for the GPU to fully utilize 4gb of VRAM even if you have that on your gtx 960
its a hardware bottleneck not a software one. however if you can find a 2gb 960 for REALLY fucking cheap you get nice budget result when you pare it with a cheap as fuck i3 dual core AMD tends to have issues with dual cores so if your too poor for a quad core chip 960 is your GPU
>>52450852
Zen isn't due until q4 2016 and it'll have the ipc of sandy bridge. It's a fucking joke.
The CES Polaris demo showcased power efficiency and made zero mentions of Performance. But that doesn't stop cocksuckers like you from dreaming.
Intel will release their Broadwell-E chips in Q2.
Massive sale spikes from Skylake thanks to non K overclocking.
Pascal releases Q2, just in time for VR.
Polaris releases Q3, overpriced, underwhelming, and shit just like Bulldozer/Trinity/Steamroller/Fiji.
Zen releases Q4.
Nothing changes. AMD remains on life support - if they're lucky.
>>52450892
the difference between the two isn't going to widen due to poor optimization. it'll reduce the framerate for both
So how long am I allowed to use my gtx 780? The 970 is just a rebrand of it, all of these benchmarks lead me to believe I can still get 2+ years out of it
>>52450959
For the next decade if you can deal with low settings.
>>52450929
ahh the nvidia troll has arrived
>Zen isn't due until q4 2016 and it'll have the ipc of sandy bridge. It's a fucking joke.
whoops you don fucked up! the IPC of zen is equivalent to and slightly higher than haswell and Zen will have unlocked multipliers across all binning tiers allowing you to overclock cheaper variants so no forking out extra dosh for a "k" variant from jewtel
Also all Zen chips have Hyperthreading as standard which means you are going to get a 4-core i7-K equivalent CPU for the price of a shitty i5 cpu thats a major fucking deal thats gonna shake up the pricing scheme of intel chips
>Intel will release their Broadwell-E chips in Q2.
prices are exactly the same with a slight increase and almost no performance gain over skylake
>Massive sale spikes from Skylake thanks to non K overclocking.
that only applies to their dual core i3s in the skylake line you fucking retard
>Pascal releases Q2, just in time for VR.
pascale wont relase until Q4 and their top end flagship cards have been delayed until Q1 2017
>Polaris releases Q3, overpriced, underwhelming, and shit just like Bulldozer/Trinity/Steamroller/Fiji.
im gonna save my response to this for a new post cause its gonna be a long one.
>Zen releases Q4.
this is literally the only thing that you have said that is factually correct
i laugh at nvidiaslaves.
i recently sold my 290x that i have had since they cam out.
3 year old cards where sold for the exact price i got them for.
then i bought a 980ti which dont get me wrong is a great card. it just is. no denying that.
but it cost a bit more than the dual 290x, and for some reason it just cant keep up on my 1440p 120hz IPS.
so i returned it and found another guy selling two sapphire 290x for about 150$ cheaper than the 980ti.
so now im back to 290x CF, 120fps constant in Battlefront on the 1440p monitor, this is with the real life mod actived lol.
the 980ti clocked to 1470mhz barely did 90fps. and since its winter time. the massive heatoutput from the 290x's (about 750watts from the wall) keeps me warm :)
Thanks based AMD for the fps and the warmth
>>52450506
>they build the engine for the 8 core jaguar cpu of consoles
>not realizing that they are just using a modded version of the engine that powered Morrowind
>not realizing that the game runs on consoles even worse
>>52451146
At least you didn't get two 980ti's.
(this is an old chart fyi - the fury x is faster now)
>>52451048
>Polaris releases Q3, overpriced, underwhelming, and shit just like Bulldozer/Trinity/Steamroller/Fiji.
Polaris is a major restructuring of the GCN architecture for 14/16nm FinFET and HBM gen 2. It adds the finishing touches on DX12 features. both Maxwell and GCN each had a few DX12 features but both also had some missing. Polaris being first to market in June/July means they will be the first fully implement tier 3 graphics card ever made with 100% of all DX12 features.
The power efficiency has gone through the fucking roof they demoed a chip at CES and it was drawing half the wattage of a 750ti this is a major deal for mobile GPU's in laptops
Their flagship Greenland is going to be an 8000 core monster with over one Terrabyte per second of memory bandwidth and 16gb of stacked VRAM
The replacement for the Fiji architecture is going to have double the bandwidth and run WAAY higher core clockspeeds because of FinFET and sell for 350-450$ (this will be the card most enthusiast buy) Their replacement for hawaii is going to be a major boost in performance with DX12 fully implemented and sell for the 200-250$ range (this will be the biggest seller im betting)
and their replacement for tonga will be a 1080p monster that runs everything maxed out for close to it at 1080p for 100-150$ (the budget card)
even if they make major performance improvements to pascale its late to market and will sell way to high for what it delivers. k
>>52451199
>The power efficiency has gone through the fucking roof they demoed a chip at CES and it was drawing half the wattage of a 750ti
It was compared to a 950, not a 750ti. Plus it is believed that chip was on the samsung LPP process, not the 16nm high performance process from glofo so we don't know how power draw scales.
>>52449424
The game was literally a ps3 game reworked. He's right
>>52451199
>FinFET
>FinFET
>FinFET
>FinFET DUDE LMAO
ff isn't magic you retard. you might be able impress dumb lurkers with your bullshit but to regular /g/ browsers it's evident you have no fucking what you're taking about. Stop fucking repeating the node process and trying to pass it off as something magical. your post is literally garbage with zero technical information other than finfet lmao
Jesus fuck it's like watching that ahmed guy saying shit like solder cpus
>>52451224
>950 not 750ti
i stand corrected, sorry about that.
the performance process will be less efficient than LPP but they are mixing and matching both processes for desktop and mobile parts for zen CPU's polaris GPU's and combined APU's
>>52451295
You need look no further than the clockspeed capabilities of Intel chips when they switched from planar to finFET
you will literally see that same kind of gains only applied differently because GPU arch this time instead of CPU arch
you are one retarded faggot you know that?
>>52451048
>whoops you don fucked up! the IPC of zen is equivalent to and slightly higher than haswell
HAHAHAAHAHA
I FUCKING WISH
NO I REALLY DO, NO JOKE
BUT YOU'RE FUCKING DREAMING
ZEN WILL BE EXPENSIVE
PERFORM LIKE SHIT
AND LATE LATE LATE
>>52451401
is your caps-lock key broken/ or are you just an attention seeking faggot?
>>52451199
New improvements also bring more tessellation ability.
>Their flagship Greenland is going to be an 8000 core monster with over one Terrabyte per second of memory bandwidth and 16gb of stacked VRAM
8GB HBM sounds more feasible. We know they'll have access to it though it's highly unlikely they'll need it for a single chip. Even the 980Ti's 6GB is a tad too much. 6GB HBM even would be more than enough since it has such insane compression abilities.
>The replacement for the Fiji architecture is going to have double the bandwidth and run WAAY higher core clockspeeds and sell for 350-450$
We really don't know whether or not clockspeeds in increase as dramatically as you think they will.Also when there's a new technology released as a first in the industry then the prices aren't exactly affordable. See Fiji.
>>52451421
Just calling out amd faggots on their bullshit.
They ALWAYS try to hype shit up
ALWAYS
here are some funny posts about the fury x a week before release, see how similar they are to the bullshit prediction posts here?
>>52451432
They should build a 16gb card just for lulz factor but i agree 8gb of HBM 2 will be all that is required for quite some time.
>We really don't know whether or not clockspeeds in increase as dramatically as you think they will.Also when there's a new technology released as a first in the industry then the prices aren't exactly affordable. See Fiji.
Polaris is a full redesign for FinFET and is being applied to all classes of GPU so we can expect significant clockspeed boosts at least for desktop parts the only thing polaris chips will have in common with previous GCN cards like tonga and fiji is the shador count to be honest and a few other features like ACE's and maybe the same number of ROPs alot of stuff is getting moved around however.
the trick is figuring out how much has changed like whether the replacement for hawaii will be HBM or GDDR5X
>>52451509
>>52451509
>he doesnt know about the Fury Nitro
>1200 on the core with air cooling
>matches stock titanX
>just like that guy said it would
>>52451509
Not the guy you're arguing with but we already know the IPC is around 40% higher than Excavator so it should be similar to Haswell.
Even if it's a bit lower it wont matter if they decide to offer the cpus unlocked.
>>52451524
>>52451550
This. If i can get a cheap lower binned AMD chip with 4/8 cores or 6/12 cores and an unlocked multiplier that is even remotely in the ballpark of haswell in terms of IPC i will never buy intel again and i bet alot of other people wont either....
>>52451585
>>52451524
>>52451509
You actually screencapped random people on forums speculating about GPU's from over a year ago just to post them here?
you should be getting a check monthly from the government for that level of autism.
>>52451532
At times the 1100mhz msi 390x is within reach of a naked 980ti at 1440p and 4k (it doesn't stand a chance at 1080p). My own 290x with monster cooling will do 1220mhz core but 1300mhz with hybrid cooling? I don't see that happening given the sort of voltage hawaii needs to hit that outside of golden samples.
>>52451611
nah m8 I'm just bored and browsing through the archive of old amd shill threads
>2012
>trinity hype threads daily
>HOLY FUCK INTEL IS FINISHED *EVERY* LAPTOP IN THE FUTURE WILL RUN ON TRINITY
>trinity released, AMD quality as usual
>not a single word spoken of it ever again
>>52451701
Naturally there are no Nvidia shills on thread right? I would not expect such deception from Nvidia.
class FO4_GameWorks : public Nv_GameWorks
{
public:
void Tick()
{
if (GRAPHICSDEVICE->OEM() != "NVIDIA")
sleep(20);
}
}
>>52447888
It's visual manipulation 101, when it comes to bar graphs. Common tactic to make them look more striking or skew the viewer's impression on the severity of the difference.
