Has anyone had experience getting negative search results on your name shed down?
I triggered some folks on Tumblr several years ago and it appears when my name is searched for. If I start making profiles on twitter, Google plus etc will they push those search results down duevery to the gap in time?
>>52440332
Delete your facebook, tumblr, twitter, instagram, periscope. your only profiles are github, stackoverflow and eventually linkedin.
Yuros have the right to forget.
You have the right to get cucked.
>>52440332
This and create tens of different fake profiles with your name. If it isn't clear which profile tumblarinas refer to, everything ends in a cacaphony. It's called drown what you can't kill.
>>52441078
Yuros can arbitrarily get anything taken down right?
>>52441112
But will any of this displace the negative front page search results? If the event happened 8 years ago, even if it's more popular surely more recent profiles will appear first?
>>52441193
Nobody knows all the details of how google page rank algorithms work but social profiles do get some boost when searching the name. I strongly doubt some reference in a shitty tumblr blog would be popular enough if you make enough fake content
>>52441268
OK thanks I'll do that
ryback 50 time world champ
kevin obese owens 50 times heavier than earth
>>52440332
You deserve it for being dumb enough to use your real name online.
>>52441432
It happened irl not online
>>52441193
>arbitrarily get anything taken down right
No you need to prove it's damaging to your reputation.
>>52441483
Trying to take things down can also lead to streisand effect. Flooding fake information is risk free and creates plausible denaibility.
>google my name
>only results are random Facebook sluts
Sucks to be you op.
>>52441560
Yeah it does, but I don't regret that I spoke my mind
>login service currently unavailable
Anyone else getting this?
>>52442565
What did you do, exactly?
>>52443360
Revealed myself to be a conservative on a US library arts college campus
>>52443391
You must have said something pretty inflammatory for them to start an online hate campaign. What was the conversation about?
>>52443474
I didn't actually, I was just outspoken. I just said that diversity was not necessarily a good thing.