>>52426068
... but there is no better IDE for C# than VS.

I abhor the idea of using VS for my day job, and will never work in another MS shop again, but even I know that.

Now, if you just want an alternative, rather than something superior: that's a different story.

Sublime with Omnisharp is great. There will be things that you will miss, but for non-enterprise level stuff it's good.
Omnisharp-Roslyn will probably be stable this year, so it'll get even better.

>>52426068
Sorry, Visual Studio is the only good IDE for C#.

I mean, since you decide to develop with a Microshaft circlejerk language that has hacked-together shit support for anything other than M$ products, you might as well go all out and spew your goo in Nutella's face.

But seriously, VS is pretty much the only good IDE for C#, because no one bothers to compete with the creators of the language.

>>52426552
>>52426482
I saw another thread similar to this, and someone said they liked QtCreator better. I looked at it, and it just didn't suit me.

>>52426068
keep vs, get resharper if you don't already have it

>>52426570
If you don't care about having a subpar C# experience compared to VS and just really want to avoid VS, just use omnisharp with Emacs+EVIL, Vim, or Sublime as suggested above.

Or don't, and let your distaste for VS and MS eventually push you to leaving for a different kind of job where you don't write C#, but something else. ;)

>>52426068
I prefer SharpDevelop over Visual Studio unless I need to manage a large project.

>>52426068
You can use Xamarin, but honestly if you're on windows just use Visual Studio.

I suggest you browse their extensions it can really improve your experience.

VS is shit for anything other than C#, but for C#, it is your best option.