CPU-z bench thread?
CPU-z bench thread.
Post your results, anons.
>>52423499
>125W
>i7-6500U has a lower score than my i5-5300U
dafuq
>>52426214
meant for
>>52425998
i5 6600k @ 4.65Ghz
Help...me...
>>52423305
99999
>>52423621
Intel's octa-cores use 140W. What's your point?
>>52423305
>proprietary benchmarks
>meaningful in any way
>>52426368
Seriously though, why would amd make such a bottlenecked APU? Shit processor, with the HD 8210 graphics. I'm surprised this garbage plays WoW of medium.
>>52426214
really dafuq? is something wrong with my laptop?
>>52426505
Because it's designed for laptops that cost less than you spend on burgers in a week.
>>52426604
Implying.
>>52426588
>>52425998
Nvm was using an older version of cpu-z
My trust AMD.
>>52426248
Running at 4.5Ghz
Its alright. Only gets up to ~68C after a while of prime95.
>>52428174
Cooler?
>>52426412
Except Intel uses real cores, not faked modules
>>52423305
Posting
i did my best
I could probably OC it harder, but im fine with it as it is.
inb4 FX hate. I know that it's not as good as an Intel processor, but it was just so cheap.
>>52431181
>1.328v
>4.2ghz
You got a shit chip man
Still going strong.
>>52426248
>4.7Ghz
Holy shit I almost forgot tat there are alot of people on /g/ who still use windows
wtf
>>52431364
some of us like playing videogames
>>52431315
you are a saint among ants! keep rocking that x2
>>52431364
iknowrite?????
>>52431364
Visual Studio is the only reason I still rock Windows.
>tfw you need to get a laptop for mobility but you are pretty much fucked with all the options out there.
Sometimes I wish life was easy as getting a thinkpad.
>>52431513
Some non-thinkpad lenovos are pretty solid. None of that yogashit
let's see how much can i overclock this shit
>>52431531
I'm still concerned about laptops, I wish you can go there and get a standard, but it pretty much resumes to trendy shit companies want to sell, laptops that have "good parts" and laptops with random pieces put together.
I still hope I don't need to go and buy a Mac or something with overly price tag to run the programs that I need.
>>52431531
the thinkpad yoga actually is pretty legit. still has rollcage and all that fun stuff
>>52431276
>mfw cpu cooler is so shit I can't even maintain 4.2 ghz and had to disable turbo
kill me, it's an aftermarket one too
>>52431621
You probably fucked up applying the thermal paste/cum, anon.
>>52431603
The first generation ones i saw were pretty flimsy and poorly built. haven't seen the newer ones though.
The old and new IdeaPad's are pretty fucking solid. I have had mine since 2011 and its still my workhorse PC. Dropped it from server racks n shit plenty of times, bent the bezel back and place and snaps in like nothing happened.
>>52431640
no, it maintains decent temps without OC (20 idle, 45 load)
but the cpu can't go over 60 on load and an OC to 4.2 does that
>>52431649
there are lenovo yogas and thinkpad yogas. thinkpad yogas are basically slimline T series. About a half step away from business class
What's the point of this thread?
I mean.. isn't this all old news, available on any half-baked review/benchmark site?
>>52426248
Here's a 2500k running at 4.6Ghz
>>52431688
>>52426248
>four years difference
Thanks Intel.
>>52431513
New inspiron 7559
>>52432000
nice
>>52432000
trips for Pentium pro
>>52431814
thats 37% increase in performance.
10% each year is ok i guess,
Peasants out of my way
FX-6300 Stock.
Need to get a cheap cooler and OC, but I'm hitting 60 fps+ in all my gaymes, so I'm reluctant.
R9 290 + Fx-6300 = Perfect 1080p Gaymen
Not upgrading till Zen, and maybe not even then if it isn't necessary.
