Post your GeekBench3 mobile scores and the phone you're using.
That was on an LG G4.
LG G2
NOTE 5
>>52422867
iPhone's have great single core performance but they're only dual cores.
LG G2 slightly ogreclocked. How are those 3 years of improvement faring ya all?
>>52423102
>but they're only dual cores
Cores are a meme. big.LITTLE is an even bigger meme.
>>52423062
pretty low desu senpaitachi
iPhone 6S Plus
Had to find one online, since I'm too cheap to pay 79p for an app, but there you go.
>>52422686
Sony Xperia E4g
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/4901868
It's a Motorola Droid Maxx. Ain't bad, I think. It's a phone.
Galaxy S6
>geekbench
Get back to /v/. Synthetic benchmarks are all crap, and Geekbench is a remarkably bad one.
>>52423151
>OC'd G2
>better single-core score but worse multi-core than my stock freqs G2 here >>52422971
wut
Also my g2 goes at ~70°c when playing something, i wanted to OC it at some point but maybe it's going to explode or something.
>>52423246
this is now an Antutu thread
>>52423246
antutu would be better ?
i've run this test 3 times on my G3 and the scores are all over the place. bullshit benchmark is bullshit.
fuck i love the high resolution screen on my G3. almost impossible to find aliasing even with text in small font.
memeplus one, cm13
>>52423157
Love how the iPhone shits all over the competition in this thread, nothing else can even get close.
>>52423275
Still not great, but better.
>>52423368
As has been discussed several times before, and the main reason no one here is replying to that bait, is iphones OS is written with single core performance in mind, android OS is written with mutlicore performance in mind
Iphone CPU scores better single core
Android CPUs score better mutlicore
shocker, it's like that's what they were designed to do or something.... /s
>>52423368
i paid 80 usd for my phone and i don't have to use that mess of os that comes with iphone
>>52423368
Nah. It has good single-core performance but mediocre to poor multicore performance. It's a tradeoff.
Of course, it's hard to say what any of this means. Geekbench is garbage with little to do with real-world performance. But even with this bogus benchmark, the iPhone is hardly shitting all over the competition.
>>52423102
Single core performance is what matters in fat daily tasks you fuck
Idol 3 5.5
>>52423466
Yeah, OK. All tasks are the same. I see.
Nexus 6P
>>52423466
In iOS sure, because it was written specifically for single core performance to be utilized.
Android OS was specifically written for multiple lower power cores to be used simultaneously.
Trying to act like single core performance is the only thing that matters just shows you're fucking stupid, or you're purposefully misrepresenting the information to make iphone look better, so which is it are you fucking stupid or are you a fanboy?
>>52423439
>>52423410
>>52423408
Then post an android phone with similar numbers. It's multi-core speed is 4400ish, pretty sure that's better than 99% of all android phones.
Nice damage control though googleshills
Is moto g 3 really the lowest score in this thread? Did I make a bad choice?
>>52423466
>Single core performance
>matters
Pick one.
Unless you're admitting all you ever use is shit like Facebook that requires next to zero power.
>>52423508
Post a +4400 multicore android phone then. As I said, pretty sure that's better than 99% of them.
>>52423535
Don't care about ifags and apple shills
>>52423536
You lost to my Idol 3, so yeah, probably.
>>52423535
>pretty sure that's better than 99% of all android phones.
Of course. Most people don't pay $600 for a phone like Applefags do. You can't pay twice the price and then act like other people are idiots for buying a 10% slower phone.
Compare it to flagships, not 99% of Android phones.
917 Single Core
2956 Multi-Core
Nexus 5
>>52423556
There have been 3 phones already posted in this thread that do that already, one of them being my own.
Also, you keep ignoring the fact single core performance on android isn't NEARLY as important as iOS.
>>52423567
Soooo...you can't?
That's ok. Just admit that the iPhone 6s Plus is best performing mobile device and we can call it a day.
>>52423556
Already been done.
>>52423062
>>52423156
>>52423221
Flagship Android phones compete with iPhones and cheap Android phones do not. Shocker.
>>52423604
Find me flagships with a multicore score over 4400 and a single core score anywhere near the iPhone 6s Plus. Still the same, they don't exist.
The iPhone is leagues above the competition and you know it.
>>52423618
i would never pay for a phone that costs more than my laptop with windows 10 and have a useless os that makes me puke
>>52423536
yes
moto Gs are fucking awful price/performance now with chinkphones and refurbished 2013-2014 flagships at the same price.
I see multi core and single , but when is they going to move to quad core???
Android shrill or ifags
>>52423157
>>52423368
>iShill
>can't even afford to buy the phone he shills
>has to google for an image
>even has to pay $1 just to run a benchmark if he did buy it
POO IN THE LOO
>>52423638
Three have already been posted. You aren't fooling anyone.
>>52423617
Because it's not. Single core performance is still what the majority of Android applications prioritise. You can keep dancing around that, pretending it doesn't, but it does. No amount of mental gymnastics can help you.
>>52423638
and still ignoring the fact that single core performance isn't as important in android as it is in iOS.
Keep on drinking that koolaid buddy.
>>52423668
Here in Sweden Romanian beggars have iPhone 6
>>52423684
>Single core performance is still what the majority of Android applications prioritise
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9518/the-mobile-cpu-corecount-debate
educate yourself if you would.
>>52423678
>three phones with massively inferior single core scores somehow proves your point
Nope
>>52423720
You specifically said mutli-core because as has already been discussed, the android OS is specifically written to use more cores than iOS is.
Keep moving the goal posts though, it sure makes your argument look a LOT more valid /s
>>52423716
I'm reading it and it's basically agreeing with everything I said.
Sorry you had to find out you have an inferior phone this way, but maybe next time you can do the intelligent thing and buy an iPhone.
>>52423720
itroll is itrolling
>>52423720
Inferior single-core and superior multi-core. As I've said repeatedly, it's a tradeoff. Neither phone wins outright. They just prioritize different types of performance.
>>52423757
>I'm reading it and it's basically agreeing with everything I said.
now you're just flat out trying to elicit responses, good job making ifags look even more retarded than they normally look.
>>52423774
Shifting the goalposts again huh? Stay classy Android user, enjoy you fractured OS.
>>52423703
And here's this one too
>>52423765
In real world terms the iPhone shits on all the competition though.
>>52423827
>iToddlers actually brag about not being able to control their meal breaks
>>52423802
Since you've refused to educate yourself, here is a relevant excerpt.
>What we see in the use-case analysis is that the amount of use-cases where an application is visibly limited due to single-threaded performance seems be very limited. In fact, a large amount of the analyzed scenarios our test-device with Cortex A57 cores would rarely need to ramp up to their full frequency beyond short bursts (Thermal throttling was not a factor in any of the tests). On the other hand, scenarios were we'd find 3-4 high load threads seem not to be that particularly hard to find, and actually appear to be an a pretty common occurence. For mobile, the choice seems to be obvious due to the power curve implications. In scenarios where we're not talking about having loads so small that it becomes not worthwhile to spend the energy to bring a secondary core out of its idle state, one could generalize that if one is able to spread the load over multiple CPUs, it will always preferable and more efficient to do so.
>In the end what we should take away from this analysis is that Android devices can make much better use of multi-threading than initially expected. There's very solid evidence that not only are 4.4 big.LITTLE designs validated, but we also find practical benefits of using 8-core "little" designs over similar single-cluster 4-core SoCs. For the foreseeable future it seems that vendors who rely on ARM's CPU designs will be well served with a continued use of 4.4 b.L designs. Only MediaTek seems to fall out of the norm here with its upcoming X20 SoC, which I'm definitely looking forward to see as to how it behaves in the real-world. We'll also see some vendors revert back to quad-core designs in their custom architectures - while we've yet to get a better picture of how these will behave in terms of performance and power, I think that 4 cores will be a quite reasonable target and sweet-spot for vendors to aim for.
>>52423268
>>52423821
There you go, Note 5 vs iPhone 6s
The 6s destroys the Note 5.
>>52423855
Yes because comparing phones across operating systems makes PERFECT sense for an objective comparison of how they perform...oh wait it is a terrible idea...
>>52423845
>Cherry-picking a paragraph
>picking the paragraphs that prove the iPhone is superior when it comes to benchmarks
Jesus are you even trying?
Also, see>>52423855
Z3c
>>52423879
Huh? That's literally the conclusion page of the article.
I linked the full 15 page + text if you want to give a read through. but it just reaffirms what the conclusion has said.
>>52423875
I'm not saying the iPhone alone is superior. The operating system is also superior. That's my point.
Well done for not getting it. Enjoy your fractured OS.
>>52423875
But you people do it with Linux, Windows and OS X. On the daily.
>>52423902
Yeah, it's the conclusion.
And they conclude that Android phones primarily utilise one core.
Genius.
>>52423907
>The operating system is also superior
kek, alright now you've just confirmed yourself as being a troll. Good job, the jigs up.
>>52423916
With synthetic benchmarks it's retarded. With real applications it is perfectly justified.
Why do iToddlers brag about benchmarks when their $1000 piece of shit and toddler OS can't even compete with an antique $100 Nexus 5 in real world tests? :^)
>>52423927
>And they conclude that Android phones primarily utilise one core
nice try senpai
>Android devices can make much better use of multi-threading than initially expected. There's very solid evidence that not only are 4.4 big.LITTLE designs validated, but we also find practical benefits of using 8-core "little" designs over similar single-cluster 4-core SoCs.
>>52423931
It is. Better user interface, better lay-out, no disgusting bloatware, faster, more efficient, less power usage, more intuitive.
Oh, and benchmarks higher.
>>52423946
citation needed
No idea if it's good, lg g2 here.
>>52423946
It looks nicer and opens smoother on the iPhone. What's your point?
>>52423944
This is a benchmark thread. But iPhone 6s still beat the competition in real world use. Literally just google it
>>52423946
https://youtu.be/-wne8m9qCFs
>>52423955
>android devices can
>can
>CAN
But don't. Most still use one core. Read the article and educate yourself.
>>52424023
Jesus, I've read the entire article 3 times over in the past few months, trust me I know exactly what it says.
Web browsing is probably 1/2 of my use on my phone during the day, web browsing also happens to be one of the MOST multi-threaded applications and takes full advantage of multicore SoCs.
Again, read the article if you don't believe me, but since it's only been 20-30 mins since i've posted it, and you're still shit posting instead of reading, you probably have a few pages left before you finish it anyway.
>>52424020
>one game that's poorly optimized for android slows them all down
>everything there actually destroyed the iShit when opening individual apps like in real world usage
Thanks for proving my point.
>>52424020
holy shit those guys have no idea what they are talking about in terms of actual technical knowledge...
>the S6 is reloading the game when the other android phones don't, it's obviously the chipset, but why would they do that?
Like nigger are you so fucking stupid you dont even know about samsung RAM management? In 20-fucking-16.
bunch of tech "journalist" retards.
>>52424020
>iPhone destroys all other flagships
>android fags still complain about 'muh multicores'
Kek
Zenmeme 2 2GB version. This is right after a restart.
This phone is overkill for my needs. (Browsing 4chan & reading manga)
Can someone run geekbench on remix os?
>>52424062
Then why does the iPhone beat all other phones when it comes to speed, as shown in this video>>52424020
>I read the article
Maybe use a dictionary to help you with the big words next time because clearly you are not getting what it clearly explains.
>>52424065
You can believe your 100 usd Android phone is faster than newest iPhone if it makes you feel better.
I mean...
http://iphone.appleinsider.com/articles/16/01/13/antutu-iphone-6s-performance-thrashes-high-spec-androids-huawei-mate-8-samsung-note-5-nexus-6p
Do we even need to?
>>52424065
>poorly optimized
But what about all your cores? You android fags love showing them off.
Kek, the delusion to actually see something and then convince yourself you are seeing something different is amazing. Android buyers remorse is hilarious.
>there are regular posters on /g/ who honestly believe apple phones are superior to android
Really guys? I mean I was one of the apple meme posters back in the day too, but the meme is getting a bit stale at this point.
Honestly, maybe we just meme'd it a bit too hard and some people here actually believed it...lol poor fucks.
>>52424148
Don't trigger the plebs, for some reason they're 'proud' of their Android shit.
I think it's all they have.
I'd like to add this as well:
https://youtu.be/qtBHW5Nn2zI
>>52424150
More cores aren't going to help shit developers get any better.
Same is true for iOS, but you fags with your locked ecosystem are never exposed to those apps.
>>52424158
>Yeah it's all a meme, who cares about higher benchmarks and a better user experience.
Android fags getting desperate I see
>>52424148
Aren't comparisons like that inherently flawed due to the fact that they fail to account for different OSs, storage types, and memory capacities? I know it's benchmarking the processor, but a processor can't reach it's full potential if it's given inadequate hardware.
>>52424174
>using an actual person to press buttons on a timed test
What the actual fuck... are the idiots ACTUALLY thinking this means anything?
The human factor alone invalidates the test from anything meaningful.
>>52424194
>buyers remorse in two sentences
>>52424198
You must be new on /g/. iPhone shilling legit started as a meme to piss off the android fan boys, it had nothing to do with us thinking iphones actually were better (closed down OS and way over priced hardware? come on lets not kid ourselves)
>>52424105
All that video showed was the iShit getting destroyed in opening speed in every app except one game. lmao
LG G3, dunno how G2s are getting higher scores.
>>52424221
Android is by its very definition inadequate, why would you be surprised the benchmarks reflect this?
>>52424224
You can see clearly they are pressing at the first opportunity.
Androidfags on suicide watch
>>52424258
>Android is by its very definition inadequate
spoken like a true iShill
Am I doing it wrong? I can't imagine its that low
probably gonna upgrade soon tho, either a lg v10 or a 2016 flagship
>>52424243
Meme magic
Trump is forerunner
/tv/ crashed a plane
/r9k/ got people arrested
/mu/ killed Lemmy
/g/ made iPhones great
>>52423946
I don't even like iphones but literally who gives a fuck about waiting another second so you can open your stupid app
>>52424278
>first opportunity
You're still adding latency from the human factor, no matter how you slice it.
Write a script to launch a set group of apps or something in a specific order if you want me to take your tests seriously.
Using a person to press a button is fucking laughable and no respectable tech site would use such a method.
>>52424307
Androidfags, which is why they are getting so butt flustered their 'more cores' don't help them win real world tests.
>>52424174
>>52424020
>>52424307
I don't fucking know, people will fling shit at each other for everything.
>>52423536
Here is my galaxy s3. Do I win?
>>52424310
>now the test isn't valid because "insert random appeal to authority here"
How deep does that rabbit hole go, Androidfag?
Galaxy s3 on 4.3 :'(
>>52424258
Which dictionary did you get this definition from?
Mi note pro. Pretty good for a $400 chinkphone.
>>52424369
The Apple Bible.
>>52424358
My iPhone 5 shits on your S III m8
>>52424253
this desu senpai
>>52424456
Impressive. I guess I should consider upgrading this decade then
Nexus 5
>iShit
>>52424582
You definitely should senpai, get anything from 2015, or if you want to wait till Apple/Samsung/Microsoft and others release their phones this year
Samsung Galaxy S III
>123 posts
>34 posters
>literally everyone whining at each other like children fighting over xbox or playstation
I think I'll just pass by...
Zenfone2
>>52424760
Is that the expensive version?
>>52424788
The 4gigs of ram model, yes
>>52423106
Idc about the scores, ima het that phone. Sexy as fuck
>>52423628
Samsung really does know how to shove performance into these phones. GG Crapple
>no redmi2 pro
Memephone
Moto g 4g, need a new phone. This heap of shit can't even run fb and chrome at the same time.
LG Risio. Not too terrible for a $30 phone
Bought this for $70 with shipping. Should last me a while.
>>52424255
Less resolution.
iphone 6s plus
Droid Turbo 2 reporting in.
>>52430286
Damn iPhones destroy the competition.
Why does /g/ pretend they're underpowered? Are the just jealous they can't afford them?
>>52430849
Overinflated SHA scores. But to be honest, Exynos 7000 series and Mediatek X10 are also guilty of hardware accelerated Encryption cheating.
Also adjusting for SHA cheating, the iPhone 6S is faster than all versions of the Core M MacBook, while consuming 1/12 peak power. Really is impressive.
Howd i do guys?
OnePlus 2, stock.
>>52422686
It cost me 150$ so its all well and fine
Plus it even has hardware 1080p h265 decoding
Galaxy Ace 3
Oneplus X
>>52428286
>expecting the $180 phone to run things well
You knew what compromises you were getting when you bought it.
Lenovo P70. Cheap, fast, it's battery lasts 8 hours of screen time. One of the best decisions I've made. The only problem I have with it is the fact those chinks haven't made a 5.1 64-bit update yet as they've promised.
