...if any?
i use avast but i am starting to have privacy concerns. MSE seems like the worst option in this regard.
at least you dont use trend micro :^)
https://code.google.com/p/google-security-research/issues/detail?id=693
>>52401516
Windows Defender / MSE
Rest is shit.
>>52401575
doesn't MSC send data back to Microsoft automatically? the last time I fiddled with it there didn't seem to be any option to prevent this.
I just want an antivirus where big bro wont rape my tiny asshole.
Any of the enterprise ones.
Only the personal versions spy on users, corporations wouldn't tolerate it.
>>52401630
MSE*
>>52401630
>>52401649
I think you can disable it, but if privacy is a very major concern for you maybe you shouldn't use any anti virus at all.
why use antivirus if you don't need it?? if I get a virus (which is almost never) I just reformat and reinstall os since there is no point in having a compromised system
>>52401783
because that is a pain in the butt gor anyone not using a rinky dink low memory XP system
I use panda cloud antivirus, am I a faggot?
>>52401915
isnt that a paid subscription service with no free option? ...why even
MSE (or Defender, or whatever) + monthly Malwayrebytes scan
>>52401996
No they have a free option, works well and I don't have to update since its cloud.until last year they didn't even give me ads, since 2016 they give me a small pesky ad in a corner sometimes ,but its better then the other free alternatives in this sense. I don't know how good it is though, the av tests seemed fine though
>>52401516
why is korbo angry?!
>>52402008
I use the same, you can disable data collection in MSE and it does a good job along with Malwarebytes scans.
>>52402090
what exactly is the difference between MSE and Windows Defender? is one preferable over the other?
also, why do you need both mwb and mse? Isn't one enough?
Common sense
>>52402246
There are none
Defender is MSE, but built into Windows
I think Vista had it, then 8/8.1 and 10
I think MSE/Defender isn't quite as good at detection, that's why I use malwarebytes to be safe
install gentoo
ESET Smart Security with infinite trials.
I don't use any.
Fight me.
Avast premium cuz I got a key from some giveaway. If I'm downloading suspicious stuff, I upload to jotti/malwr/anubis
CommonSense™ 2013
>>52402458
>not updating to 2015
fucking pleb
>>52402475
why should I?
it works perfectly fine
detects every known virus
>>52402502
fucking outdated fag
why don't you go back to xp
SE Linux
>>52401642
b8
>>52401516
Just bought NANO Antivirus, 998RUB (13$ more or less) for 1000 days of subscription. Lets see how good it goes :^)
>>52402572
>Just bought
>bought
AHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>52402642
>not supporting small companies and its authors
>>52402572
>>52402662
>www.nanoav.ru
>.ru
Nice of you to support small foreign botnets as well
>>52402673
I am russian, is not foreign :^)
>>52402691
Cyka blyat, etc etc
You still use Windows and the internet :^)
>>52402713
((((((
clamav
>>52401516
uBlock Origin + Brain.
Malwarebytes for scanning sketchy files and full scans every few months or so.
>>52402855
>Brain
what does that addon do?
>>52402855
do you use malwarebytes + windows defender/MSE, or just mwb by itself?
Avast free and a hacked melwerebytes.
>>52401572
Most of the big ones have had similar shit happen to them already. I wouldn't trust any antivirus suite that hijacks your system.
>>52401516
>use an anti-virus they said
>it protects your computer they said.
https://code.google.com/p/google-security-research/issues/detail?id=693
Which is the most light-weighted anti-virus best suited for old machines?
GNU/Linux
test
well... ... ... which anti virus suits DONT hijack your system? it seems like virus protection software does more harm than good nowadays.
I use ESET since I got it reallllllly cheap at the place where I work and Malwarebytes and its forever key they used to sell.
>>52403453
>no android version
dropped
>>52403526
>implying android isn't just linux
>>52403526
Well you see brain® has a dependency on common® sense™.
However anyone with common sense wouldn't use Jewgle Lagdroid.
>>52403353
None.
AV software must be able to intercept and scan everything that enters or leaves your computer. It is impossible for AV software to "protect" you, if it cannot hijack your computer.
>>52403075
Just MBAM.
Avast.
Kaspersky
AV is dangerous snakeoil. Only retards trust AV.
>>52404027
That's like saying airbags are harmful because they give false sense of security and won't prevent a crash. Disposing of them for that reason is what's retarded.
>>52404500
It would be a proper analogy if having airbags in your car meant you had to remove your doors, breaks and the steering wheel.
>>52404500
Airbags are not sold to prevent crashes, AV is sold to prevent malware infections.
Having an airbag does not provoke more crashes, having an AV does increase the attack surface.
>>52404574
>you had to remove your doors, breaks and the steering wheel.
Which is not a correct analogy to AV.
>>52403453
This is the only correct answer combined with good add-ons.
(Doesn't hurt to use CCleaner/Malwarebytes once in a while though.)
>>52402823
common sense would have also worked but>>52401516 if you need a antivirus, clamav is pretty decent and its free
ESET .. Because the founder is a former student of our school.
>>52401575
Yeah, rest is shit I agree
>>52401630
Said it sends data to microsoft so I literally spent 5 seconds looking and You can go to: Configurations > last option(below advanced mine's not in english) > I do not want to participate (blah blah mine's not in english)radioButton.
By the way, not trend micro
>>52403770
this desu
>>52401572
>https://code.google.com/p/google-security-research/issues/detail?id=693
>have security exploit
>get reported
>consulting stakeholders for an emergency fix
What?!
>>52406748
.../g/ school of thought or your university?
>EMET
>The Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit
2016
>>52403192
Ugh. Seeing this makes me want to go and make a higher resolution of it, but my copy of BBC's Planet Earth is on my off-site storage.
