the 380x is the king of 1080p
nvidiafags on suicide watch
>>52395963
>nvidia
what a fucking joke
Muh 980
when is nvidia going to release the damn gtx 960 ti? I KNOW IT FUCKING EXISTS YOU GREEN FAGLORDS, JUST RELEASE IT ALREADY!
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-960-oem/specifications
>>52397060
>buying nvidia
lol
>>52395963
> 1080p
yer im real jealous of you.
>>52395963
comparing with a GTX 970 only, why ?
afraid to get rekt?
>look ma, i'm running against a crippled guy and i'm winning
>>52398250
Maybe because it's in the same price category. Hell in my country R9 380x is cheaper by like $50.
>>52398250
>comparing with a GTX 970 only
There's also a 960 there.
>why ?
If you mean "why no 980", that's because the 980 is more than twice the price of the 380X you dumb shit
>>52398250
Because it's the same price ?
>>52398384
970 is a good $100 or so more expensive than the 380X bro (at least on newegg US). $230 card vs $330 card.
>>52398415
Even better then.
that doesnt look like anandtech's benchmarks at all
>>52398476
wow i wonder why
>>52395963
>2016
>1080p
topkek
>>52398476
Kek
Who cares about this midrange bullshit?
>>52398476
that OP cherry pick
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1592?vs=1594
ITT: People saying the 380x is priced the same as a 970
970 = $320
380x = $225
>Same price
380x perf/dollar isn't close to 7970, 280x, or 290.
>>52395963
How the fuck does a 380 outperform a 970? That doesn't seem right, the 970 should be way better besides the 3.5 meme
>>52400026
Oh wait I'm retarded and read 380 where it says 390
>>52400026
Check your eyes
>>52398988
People on a budget. AKA poorfags, and I know I'm one.
I've waited for Nvidia to release a 960 ti or something but it's obvious that's not happening any time soon, so I got a 380X
>>52400052
>tiny screen
>shit resolution
>need to get new glasses because eyesight only keeps getting worse and it's been like 4 years since last check
I-I have an excuse anon
>>52395963
>2016
>1080p
Nigga 1080p was tapped out damn near 2 years ago hardware wise.
>>52400082
But it's still the standard, because the standard is determined by poorfags.
>1080p
Awh, that's cute.
>>52399859
In Brazil it is more or less the same price and R9 390 is 20% more expensive than GTX 970 and 390x is 50% more expensive.
We Brazilians love the GTX 970, top tier card.
>>52395963
The 380x is the king of my electricity bill
>>52399520
The 390 gets stomped by the GTX 970.
>>52400500
>FXAA
nice try
I wanna play GTA V on 1080p60FPS but I'm on a budget. Should I go 750 ti or 950?
>>52400539
neither
>>52400575
why?
>>52400500
fuck off
>>52398988
I do, my screen is 1920x1200 and that probably won't change in the foreseeable future.
Anything higher seems pointless really.
>>52400055
people actually on a budget get a real poorfag's card like a 750
a €250 card isn't exactly a poorfag's choice
>XFX
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD DO NOT DO THIS.
I had an xfx card die on me under warranty a month ago and they've just been jerking me around since to try and get the warranty to expire before they have to fix it.
DO NOT PURCHASE XFX PRODUCTS
>>52398988
Why should I buy a high end card if all I play is WoW and other light graphical games
guys is a gtx 970 or 390x better? i need a new card for playing runescape
>>52400096
720p is standard, laptop fags and consoles outnumber desktop.
>>52401378
You're going to need a Titan X if you want to play on ultra @1080p
>>52401344
>2016, not playing wow at ultra 16x AA 1440p 100 fps.
>>52401378
Why would anyone buy a 970 knowing full well it's a gimped piece of shit?
My brother did. Disappointed.
>>52397060
Never. They're scrambling to get Pascal released sometime this year.
Not gonna happen in the first half, though.
>>52400263
>970
>top tier
At best for the price, its 3.5th place at best
>>52401396
Wouldnt even bother trying without SLI
>>52401344
Doing progress raids @30 fps is a pain, I can tell you. Im looking for upgrades just because of this fact.
>the Year of Our Lord, Two Thousand Sixteen Anno Domini
>One thousand eighty vertical pixels
>>52401896
What card are you using?
>>52401932
GTX 560 Ti overclocked
>>52401896
GPU power helps in raids with settings turned up no doubt, but because of all the players in the same area it's more CPU intensive than anything else.
>>52401965
Yeah I got a Phenom II @ 2,8Ghz,
but thats for another thread
>>52401543
because 2 years ago it was the best card for the price, even in assuming it is a 3500MB card.
granted, if 980ti existed when I bought mine, I probably would've gone the extra mile for that.
>>52401979
>playing wow with AMD CPU
>>52401979
>>52402020
this
breh you gotta get an Intel CPU at some point. AMD is garbage for WoW.
>>52402029
New rig with i7 Skylake is currently shipping.
But I would like to stop the shitposting for now.
>>52400663
You sir have made my day
>>52402077
I don't know if you're being facetious but I mean a higher tier graphics card for the resolution.
I sure as shit wouldn't mind a 4k screen but it was out of my budget when the old monitor died.
>>52402019
Sure, in the past it made sense.
>>52401446
wow wont run 100 fps with that unless you have an insane pc, and even then its unlikely in a heavy area
Every evening without failure after I finish work I get home, order sweet and sour chicken with a diet coke and watch you retards argue back and forth about the same shit. My life is proof that /g/ never changes.
>>52402384
>not cooking your own meals
Pleb.
So seems this card can pull around 45-50 FPS on Withcer 3 on 1080p.
I need a new GPU and Pascal seems too far away.
Should i buy this or give some extra for a 970/390? I only play 1080p.
>>52402019
