![core-i7-skylake-6700k-in-motherboard-640x427[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/mAjbKnk.jpg "core-i7-skylake-6700k-in-motherboard-640x427[1].jpg")
INTEL CPU'S CAN'T DO MATH!
HAHHAAHHAHA
>INTEL BTFO
>INTEL ON SUICIDE WATCH
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/01/intel-skylake-bug-causes-pcs-to-freeze-during-complex-workloads/
How does this make you feel Jewtelfags?
Can you do math Anon?
>>52395267
that cpu is lacking a heatsink
>complex workloads
>can be patched
It's not an issue for most people.
>>52395281
Only way to prevent it bending.
>>52395286
>can be patched
via a microcode bios update that less then 25% of people will actually flash
no microcode update will truly fix a jarring design flaw like this, it will only help ease the problem
>>52395307
Who exactly does this design flaw affect? Seeing as many new computers are now running Skylake yet no one else seems to have reported anything.
>>52395343
It could be an extremely serious problem for people who do CPU intensive work like 3D animations, video encoding, ray tracing, etc.
They'll be forced to buy a haslel motherboard and cpu to do their work.
oh that explains why it feels slow and laggy
>>52395414
Well, sure seems like Intel fucked up on this one. I have Skylake CPU but haven't noticed any differences but my workloads aren't that intense.
>>52395286
>>52395414
>CPU intensive work.
>3D
>Video
>Ray Tracing
Nigga this aint 1999 anymore, CUDA fixed that problem years ago.
>>52395487
it looks like vertically mirrored tits with the assassin's creed logo on top
>has a bug
>still faster than AMD
jewtel always wins
>>52395414
None of that is CPU intensive, you really don't belong on this board.
>>52395414
haswell has tsx instructions disabled
>>52395531
>posting top nep
>>52395574
Rather a Miku?
>>52395531
Sorry I meant dwarf fortress
>>52395509
look closer
>>52395583
i'd like one mari-chan pls
I'm building a rig with 64GB RAM and part of why I was excited is bitcoin mining. Is this going to kill it?
this is why they made microcode upgradable .
no issues here
>>52395531
>None of that is CPU intensive, you really don't belong on this board.
Elaborate. Ray tracing and 10-bit h264 video encoding uses 100% of my CPU. That seems pretty fucking CPU intensive to me.
>>52395693
>cpu bitcoin mining
>bitcoin mining at all
>>52395503
CUDA based h264 encoding is dogshit. It's fast but the quality is vomit inducing. You also can't encode 10-bit h264.
>>52395695
again, less then 25% of people will actually flash the update, hell I don't even know a single person who updates their bios
>>52395752
lol good luck decoding ultra hd hevc video 20mbits on software
>>52395891
I can, my i7-2700k decodes that just fine with hardware acceleration disabled. Not all of us watch movies on our phones you know.
>>52395891
My HP laptop I bought from wallmart can do that. I don't get it.
>>52395289
I can taste the b8
>>52395939
>>52395921
lol right
>>52395693
you fucking tard
>>52395962
Then your test is outdated or something. I played a ~30mbps 4K hevc test file on my laptop and it played lag and stutter free with gpu acceleration turned off in VLC.
Granted my CPU was hitting 80-90% utilization.
>>52396037
run it yourself
http://1drv.ms/1DDF0SU
>>52396046
I'm on mobile right now but I'll run it as soon as I get home.
I still think your test results are inaccurate. The codec has been improved significantly and maybe requires less cpu resources to decode now.
>>52395307
Less than 1% of people will be affected by the bug so that's a pretty good coverage of the issue.
>>52395267
>Still running an i5 3570k I bought 4 years ago
>Still has no problems
>Before that I owned some AMD CPU, don't even remember which one
>Always had problems
>Always BSODing
>Always getting hot while on the Desktop
>Always being shit
HAHAHA INTEL BTFO AMD BETTER YEAH!
>>52395527
>faster
>that's clearly a matter of precision
Go back to /v/, faggot!
>>52396303
i doubt that was your cpu
>>52396303
Leave.
>>52395891
He was talking about encoding and not decoding, you illiterate.
>>52395267
> said the ayymd user while pouring ln2 over his CPU to prevent it achieving nuclear fusion.
>>52396303
>I was retarded and had no idea what the fuck I was doing 4 years ago
>I am still retarded today so I keep blaming the cpu for it
>>52395716
Maybe you shouldn't be using a pentium 4 then.
>>52395267
i still feel better than someone who un-ironically says "jewtel"
Or any of you dumbass fanboys really, brand loyalty is for suckers who don't understand the point of a free market.
CPU bugs are notoriously hard to shake loose due to the complexity of the entire circuit and the speed that CPU runs at. Still manufacturers would have noticed any obvious bugs during debugging so I would bet this bug requires some out of the ordinary conditions that most people will never come across. Those that are affected should be able to return their CPU and/or mobo at the very least if they cannot just install the update for some reason.
>>52395274
