Well /g/ ?
Big, expensive toner but prints forever without any Issues. One of the best tech purchases I ever made.
Inkjet never again.
I don't print enough to justify toner.
>>52382667
I'm glad to see a recovering Inklet around here, goes to show everyone's a little step to stop prepping others
>>52382678
>Be Inklet
>Don't print enough
>Ink dries up
>Be LaserJet pilot
>Don't print enough
>Toner lasts forever
>>52382698
I mean I literally print things maybe once a year. I only have a printer because it was free.
>>52382595
>laserjet
>inkjet
>not dot matrix
shiggydiggy
>>52382595
You kids sure are desperate to make the next hot meme out of whatever dumb crap you can think of
>>52382667
I used to have to use that piece of shit for work, and it was that biggest piece of shit I've ever used. I went through three in as many years, and they would jam about every 20 sheets (I print about 50 to 70 sheets a day on average). Luckily I've got a Brother printer now, and it's jammed twice in about two years.
People still print shit?
>>52383006
I only ever print a few pages at times but I've printed a whole tray load of pages at once a few times and It didn't jam on those Instances. Guess I got lucky.
Silly paper plebs, nothing needs to be in hard copy any more.
>>52384236
They probably just couldn't handle the continuous workload, they definitely got worse over time. To be fair through, any laser printer should be able to handle a heavy workload.
>>52384351
Believe me, if I could cut printing out of my job I would, but due to its nature that's not going to happen anytime soon.
