That's kinda what I do. A good, comfortable headset is always a nice thing to have, and if you want to upgrade your audio setup, you have a good component for it already with you.

>>52349579
I>>52349579
If you have the money then id go for it

>>52349579
Do it. They will last for years and they're not even that expensive.

>>52349579
No, you probably have low quality mp3s or use Internet radio and you won't hear the difference. Buy something that's max comfy that you'll wear all day

Unless you've got a decent source don't bother.

Shit in = shit out; No matter the headphone.

>>52350545
That's why I'm asking. Although I'm not much of audiophile, comfort would be a huge plus.

>>52350525
Are Sony MDR-V55 any good?

>>52349579
I think it's good to have decent stuff, so if you visit the headphone thread have a look at the stuff at the lower price end of their list
some people on here convince themselves it's necessary to spend loads of money on phones, dac and all

I have more expensive stuff but I make my own music for fun
if you want them for casual listening get a cheaper model from a recommended brand by /g/™ and maybe a cheap USB dac if your current source is rubbish
then make sure you listen to at the very least mp3 v0 or mp3 320, I'd recommend 320 unless you want to go lossless ;)

>all these placebo fags

I bought a Senn HD555 years ago. With some care it's still in good shape and it's comfy when wearing it for longer periods of time. It only cost me like 120eurobucks but I'm glad I got one.

>>52350670
i have them and they're pretty uncomfortable. they're supra-aural and have high clamping force.

>>52350968
K, thanks for warning!

Higher fidelity is useful for anyone doing any application
>>52350525
Stop saying shit like this.

>>52350846
>$150 headphones
>placebo
kek
>>52350545
Your average phone or computer integrated output is good enough for the ATH-M50s or whatever.