>>52228787
You need common sense 2016

>>52228800
Stop this shitty meme, that wont protect me against drive by attacks

>>52228810
well if you first of all, stop going to shady websites, use an ad/script blocker, and a modern browser (hint: not IE), you can easily avoid drive by attacks.

Neither. If you must use an antivirus, get Bitdefender.

>>52228787
>antivirus

WHITELISTS

Choose your poison: USG, RUSG, or CHINKG.

>>52228986
Why?

>>52228969
https://blogs.sophos.com/2015/07/21/a-closer-look-at-the-angler-exploit-kit/
Whats a modern browser? All are full of vulnerabilities than can be used by exploit kits:
http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-1224/product_id-15031/Google-Chrome.html
http://www.cvedetails.com/product/3264/Mozilla-Firefox.html?vendor_id=452

>>52229281
> Thinking antivirus is just whitelists
> 2016

>>52228787
> needing antivirus software
k e k

any idea?

Nobody? What about Emisoft anti malware?

>>52229512
Malwarebytes + Common Sense

>>52229290
The negative impact of a proprietary virus scanner is still certainly larger than the negative impact of not using one.

>>52228800
>0 day

I myself just use malwarebytes and Windows Defender but I definitely think common sense 2016 can go a VERY F*CKING long way when it comes to not becoming a botnet

>>52230868
>proprietary

go fuck yourself, you open source whore

>>52228787
Stick with windows defender
Hitman if you are too retarded
Why the fuck would you need antivirus on android?

>>52229290
lol
I'm dying right now.

yeah, some shitware binary blob is going to protect you from shortcomings in other software or your kernel.

what a fucking joke.
I can't believe people eat this shit up.

>>52233445
Because Android is having a lot of marketshare and malware makers are moving onto it. Play Store revisions are lax and there are already many malware apps.

>>52233732
then stop downloading nonfree binaries for your phone dipshit.

what makes you think another nonfree binary is going to save you if google can't even fucking do it within a "timely" manner?

>>52233780
> stop downloading nonfree binaries

>Put the source of a malicious binary on github
>Release it as an open source program
Do you think someone is going to bother reviewing the code to check it is not malicious? Google also reviews the code, or they say so

>>52233856
freetards gonna retard

>>52228787
Kaspersky hands down