>mfw sub 30 idle temps
>mfw 70+ temps under any real strain
>mfw want a new PC anyway but too tight to buy one until this dies
>>52219058
>mfw sub 20 idle temps.
>>52219058
>old PC with a busted GPU
>Australia
>70-80 idle
>mfw 55C idle on GPU
t-thanks AMD
Sub 0 K temps is where it at.
>>52219409
lies
>45 idle
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>52219755
>nvidia
found the problem anon
Does watercooling end up being cheaper than fan cooling? The individual units are pricier, and would take more power than fans but would the extra longevity and decrease power draw from the components due to low temps offset it?
>>52219816
>>52219058
My delidded 6700K idles at 13 degrees. Thank you insulation free Japanese construction.
amidoinitrite guiz?
>>52219937
literal housefire
>>52219816
No, neither of your statements are worth considering. Terrible questions.
liquid cooling must be maintained in case of fittings loosening, pumps add new thing to fail, shit gets corroded, fluids must be flushed, etc.
Also lower temps do not decrease power draw enough to ever matter ever. I even heard that intel voltage regulators are most efficient at 115C, and if chips could get that hot then they may be more efficient.
>>52219058
>tfw hot but not too hot to care
>>52219816
Heat generation has nothing to do with cooling. wattage does. Watercooling removes the heat from the CPU/GPU faster than air. My whole room temps rise with water compared to air, which only made the side of my room with the pc fucking hot.
Only consider water if you're going to OC your pc as far as it will go.
Running 4.8ghz with 1.32vcore for the past year. Had the cpu since it was released...had to drop it down from 5.1ghz because it is became unstable.
temps are a little high because I haven't cleaned my PC out in a 9 months. so fucking dusty and 1 fan died. but who cares, it still runs.
>>52220196
With room air temp at 27c the CPU is idling on air with 4.33GHz OC.
I tried it at 4.8GHz but decided not without watercooling, though it did run stable for hours.
