[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
/ptg/ - Private Tracker General
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 31
File: ptg5.jpg (2 MB, 2448x3264) Image search: [Google]
ptg5.jpg
2 MB, 2448x3264
Where can I find The Anvil Hoarder (1930) edition

Old thread: >>52197020

Not sure what private trackers are all about?

Check out the wiki and update it yourself if you want more instead of complaining like a fucking faggot. https://wiki.installgentoo.com/index.php/Private_trackers

How to get into private trackers (and survive): http://pastebin.com/5tw1E2ky
Paths to get into trackers: http://pastebin.com/D74UA1UK

What.CD Interview Notes: http://pastebin.com/Wgz6T7ta
https://www.whatinterviewprep.com/

Trackers doing festive activities
http://pastebin.com/1wtzP2wS

Various tracker IRCs and sites open for signup
http://pastebin.com/Y6X9Vjdx

Use >>>/g/ptg as a link to find the /ptg/ thread.

Remember the following:
>staff occasionally read these generals and have posted here before.
>staff may pretend to be normal users asking for invites and when you invite them, they ban you for inviting strangers
>people may report emails and other personal info posted here to staff to get you banned.
>most of the invite offers here are people trolling you with false hope - begging for invites is a waste of time and you should just interview
>>
>>52205341
>Where can I find The Anvil Hoarder (1930) edition


First for shit edition name edition.
>>
Second for fuck you x265 guy your encodes a shit.
>>
There's an entire board for this shit. Why are you here?
>>
>>52205424
Which Board?
>>
>>52205488
He's probably referring to /t/
>>
>>52205495
>/t/
people actually use that shit?
>>
>>52205510
no
nobody uses it.

it's the slowest board on 4chan(fact), and none of the threads have anything to do with private trackers.
>>
is there anywhere other than hdb and ahd that the TayTO 1080p The Martian encode will be released? Just curious to where it trickles down to if at all.
>>
>>52205638
found it on uhdbits so far
>>
>>52205638
It's already on PTP faggot open ur i's mayn
>>
>>52205638
Yeah. PTP
>>
>>52205678
>>52205689
yeah minus PTP too, no way I can get into that
TSh doesn't have it and neither does IPT. Only UHDBits so far. Any others?
>>
>>52205728
>no way i can get into that

Except it's easy as fuck to get into these days
>>
>>52205728
>yeah minus PTP too, no way I can get into that
You what? PTP recruits from what.cd 2 month old accounts, read the OP.

Also, the ZQ encode on AHD is just as good.
>>
>>52205728
TorViet, but that doesn't count because hungdaita uploaded there. Maybe bB will have them if they get back up.
>>
File: x265.png (2 MB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
x265.png
2 MB, 1920x1080
x265 1769kbps: https://wakaba.dhcp.io/files/1c7.mkv

vs.

x264 3280kbps: https://wakaba.dhcp.io/files/1c8.mkv

See if you can spot a significant difference. Some very slight softening of detail is all I can see, for half the bitrate. Certainly nothing like an 'unbearable' quality difference as some of the reactionaries here would have you believe.

Screenshot frame is 149. Source material is 6871kbps.

Settings used:

x265 settings: wpp / ctu=64 / min-cu-size=8 / max-tu-size=32 / tu-intra-depth=4 / tu-inter-depth=4 / me=3 / subme=5 / merange=92 / rect / amp / max-merge=5 / temporal-mvp / no-early-skip / rdpenalty=0 / tskip / no-tskip-fast / strong-intra-smoothing / no-lossless / no-cu-lossless / no-constrained-intra / no-fast-intra / open-gop / no-temporal-layers / interlace=0 / keyint=250 / min-keyint=25 / scenecut=40 / rc-lookahead=60 / lookahead-slices=0 / bframes=8 / bframe-bias=0 / b-adapt=2 / ref=5 / limit-refs=3 / limit-modes / weightp / weightb / aq-mode=1 / qg-size=32 / aq-strength=1.00 / cbqpoffs=0 / crqpoffs=0 / rd=6 / psy-rd=0.30 / rdoq-level=2 / psy-rdoq=1.00 / signhide / deblock / sao / no-sao-non-deblock / b-pyramid / cutree / no-intra-refresh / rc=crf / crf=21.5 / qcomp=0.60 / qpmin=0 / qpmax=51 / qpstep=4 / vbv-maxrate=40000 / vbv-bufsize=40000 / crf-max=0.0 / ipratio=1.40 / pbratio=1.30

x264 settings: cabac=1 / ref=16 / deblock=1:-1:-1 / analyse=0x3:0x133 / me=tesa / subme=11 / psy=1 / psy_rd=1.00:0.15 / mixed_ref=1 / me_range=24 / chroma_me=1 / trellis=2 / 8x8dct=1 / cqm=0 / deadzone=21,11 / fast_pskip=0 / chroma_qp_offset=-3 / threads=6 / lookahead_threads=1 / sliced_threads=0 / nr=0 / decimate=1 / interlaced=0 / bluray_compat=0 / constrained_intra=0 / bframes=16 / b_pyramid=2 / b_adapt=2 / b_bias=0 / direct=3 / weightb=1 / open_gop=0 / weightp=2 / keyint=250 / keyint_min=25 / scenecut=40 / intra_refresh=0 / rc_lookahead=60 / rc=crf / mbtree=1 / crf=22.0 / qcomp=0.60 / qpmin=0 / qpmax=69 / qpstep=4 / ip_ratio=1.40 / aq=1:1.00
>>
File: x264.png (2 MB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
x264.png
2 MB, 1920x1080
>>52205949
>>
>>52205773
Thanks, but can't find the ZQ encode anywhere outside AHD/PTP either,
>>
>>52205949
>>52205969
Why did you use black porn for the source material?
>>
>>52206006

I wanted to use something that had a high bitrate and shows a lot of fine detail

I have 10GB JAVs, but even they don't show as much detail as this scene
>>
>>52205949
Disgusting black female, but I want the source. Post it.
>>
>>52206040

It's Jezabel Vessir

filename is "jez012ATK_312738001_hd"
>>
>>52206006
There is literally nothing wrong with black girl porn.
>>
>>52205949
Holy shit just stop posting for a while and understand that we're trying to teach you something.
If you actually read the last thread you'll see that the anons were talking about USABLE BITRATES and even CONCEDED TO YOU that x265 was more efficient at (too) low bitrates.

>>52203977
>>52204124

The bitrates you're using are way too low for 1080p and just because you don't see the banding and blocking on BOTH encodes doesn't mean that every one else doesn't.
As has been said by multiple people already, you will get better results by using x264 and just LOWERING THE RESOLUTION.

I'm also starting to understand that you haven't done a frame-accurate source/encode/encode before because you still haven't done one.

Just chill the fuck out with your subjective quality*encoding factor*resolution bullshit and have a listen to people that actually might know more about this than you do.

It's also painfully obvious that you're not on a decent HD tracker, by the way.
>>
>>52205638
IPT and PTP.
>>52206099
You must like cucks too, don't you.
>>
File: h4h request.png (22 KB, 1251x335) Image search: [Google]
h4h request.png
22 KB, 1251x335
https://www.reddit.com/r/Invites/comments/3z8w4s/w_h4h/
>>
>>52206040
You have shit taste m8, Jezabel Vessir is GOAT.
>>
>>52206099
My nigga
Nicole Skyler <3
>>
>>52206111
I think you're mistaken. Unlike you, I dislike porn with black guys, and enjoy porn with black girls.
>>
>>52206112
Bet you bought your way into those trackers.
>>
>>52205949
>rc_lookahead=60
>mbtree=1
>decimate=1

Well lets not pretend that you know how to encode.
>>
>>52205949
Could you please actually watch your encodes and realise that they're both fucking terrible.
>>
>>52206162
wasnt me i was about to offer some invites to IPT and saw that anotehr anon beat me to it lol
>>
>>52206112
UPVOTED!
>>
>>52206236
Sent :^)
>>
>>52206108
>If you actually read the last thread you'll see that the anons were talking about USABLE BITRATES and even CONCEDED TO YOU that x265 was more efficient at (too) low bitrates.

I get it. You and the other "enlightened" 15-year-olds here and at oppaitime would consider what is in that screenshot I posted "unwatchable".

What I'm trying to tell you is that an average person would give it a rating of 3-3.5/5 on subjective testing, which is well above 'watchable', and if you analyze it closely there is insignificant detail loss when considering we save half the bitrate.

>The bitrates you're using are way too low for 1080p

The x265 video bitrate for 1080p should be ~3000kbps, but I'm demonstrating that even when that quality is halved, it still looks damn good at 1080p. For a 4/5 on subjective testing, you would need ~3000kbps which is the 'sweet spot' compromise between increased quality and diminishing returns.

>As has been said by multiple people already, you will get better results by using x264 and just LOWERING THE RESOLUTION.

I used CRF22 for x264 which is already quite low. I encoded at 1536x864, not 1080p as you try to suggest. CRF ~18 would be optimal, but keep in mind that I used CRF 21.5 for the x265 encode also.
>>
>>52206321
>an average person would give it a rating of 3-3.5/5 on subjective testing
Where are you getting this number?
>>
File: Autism_Speaks_Logo.jpg (12 KB, 400x400) Image search: [Google]
Autism_Speaks_Logo.jpg
12 KB, 400x400
>>52206321
>>
>>52206368
Open ass, pull number
>>
>>52206321
No, you still arent getting it. We're saying that x265 is still useless because it can't produce good results at good bitrates and you're showing us bitstarved encodes without source/encode/encode comparison and then talking about some fucking subjective scale you have that means literally nothing of value to anyone.
>>
File: AHD after FL.png (2 KB, 314x50) Image search: [Google]
AHD after FL.png
2 KB, 314x50
hows this fa.m? i was away on travels so couldn't really take advantage of the FL (maybe grabbed 50gbs worth at the most)
>>
>>52206447
:^)
>>
>>52206484
nice try PTP faggot
>PTP is always FL
>>
File: Screenshot_2.png (38 KB, 850x82) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2.png
38 KB, 850x82
who /rulebreaker/ here
>>
>>52206597
>being wrong on the internet
>>
>>52206430

>We're saying that x265 is still useless because it can't produce good results at good bitrates

If you go back and read my first post that started this, you'll see I said I wanted to encode files that are 5GB+ in size down to 200-900MB in size.

For a 2-hour file sized 900MB, this would mean a video bitrate of 964kbit/s. So clearly my intention is not to encode at what you consider 'good bitrates'.

But I will add this: The sample encode I posted had a bitrate of 1769kbit/s. This would make a 2-hour video with 36kbit/s audio have a size of 1.59GB. This, as shown by my screenshots, is pretty much equivalent to a 3.2GB x264 video - double or triple the size of the infamous 'YIFY' encode. Only a fool would say that's not 'good' quality.
>>
>>52206626
We've already covered this. I said:

>You're standards are lower than others, that's fine, enjoy your encodes, just don't...put them anywhere.
>>
>>52206618
mcadams get the fuck out of here
>>
can we get this (comfy martian encode on ptp to trump the legion, le cross reading reasons) thanks senpaitachi

https://awesome-hd.net/torrents.php?id=18310&torrentid=38020

https://tls.passthepopcorn.me/torrents.php?id=133494


also whats wrong with full links. annoying as shit desu
why PTP: /torrents.php?id=133494?
>>
>>52206715
no u
>>
>>52206722
I guess you can hope, but 90% chance the TayTO will go GP because it has more autism zones.
>>
File: x.png (2 MB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
x.png
2 MB, 1920x1080
>>52206687

Well too bad, because they're going up on private porn trackers that I am a member of

1000kbit/s x265 would be better quality than most of the stuff that is currently uploaded

Most JAVs are uploaded as ~1.2GB ~1200kbit/s x264 files anyway (equivalent to ~600kbit/s x265). And no JAVs that I know of are above ~6GB in size (except for 60fps videos, which are obviously double that). So my standards can't be 'lower than others', if no higher quality exists.

The idiots who said x264 is better than x265 got fucking rekt

Here's a x265 949kbit/s screenshot to compare with >>52205949 and >>52205969
>>
>>52206784
Are you that guy posting HEVC reencodes on Emp. What's gross is you're not even using the source to go to HEVC, you're grabbing 1080p h264 encodes and using those as the source.
>>
>>52206784
kill yourself you piece of shit x265 should be nuked from orbit.
>>
>>52206784
>he still doesn't understand compares

V:10 THANKS YIFY
>>
>>52206715
what that was mcadams hating on my ahd stats :v(
>>
>>52206784
>And no JAVs that I know of are above ~6GB in size (except for 60fps videos, which are obviously double that). So my standards can't be 'lower than others', if no higher quality exists.

I think you might have the Down's senpai.
>>
>>52206784
>except for 60fps videos, which are obviously double that
>which are obviously double that
Yeah. You don't understand encoding at all.
>>
>>52206867
Love you too, anon.
>>
>>52206867
that's a pretty rare pepe

don't mind if i do
>>
How's the invites section of AB?
>>
>>52206979
Gets you into AHD, TehC, PTP, WCD, GGn
>>
>>52207005
>GGn
>>
>>52206798

You're making yourself look like a dumb cunt desperately trying to hang on to a shred of your original argument

You've unwittingly just proven my point as you couldn't find more than a dozen JAVs over 6GB

The fact is that most JAVs are released as ~5GB WMV files
>>
>>52206784
source?
>>
So this is private power tracker.

>>52206979
If you reach PU you can get on TehC and get comfy like me downloading a few old favorites there but I think you need a seedbox to build proper buffer.

They are not fans of freeleech (people will say otherwise) but it's true.

Only freeleech are torrents that have less than 5 seeders - hence downloading old favorites.

AB has a few other movie sites such as x264 or some shit and a few members offer invites to other places.
>>
>>52207025
I'm not the same guy, unless you meant to reply to the guy posting an image of HDB JAV encodes. The post you quoted was my only post on the issue. I know nothing about JAV.
>>
File: private tracker power.png (3 KB, 461x62) Image search: [Google]
private tracker power.png
3 KB, 461x62
>>52207036
>>
>>52207036
Literally what language are you speaking
>>
>>52206909

What don't I understand exactly?

A 60fps JAV is double the size of a 30fps JAV. It is you who don't understand how video works if you don't know that.
>>
>>52207053

>So this is private power tracker.

The only sentence there that didn't make sense.
>>
>>52207042

Sorry, I responded to the wrong post

Should be for >>52206895
>>
>>52207056
Double the frames doesn't mean literally double the size. Data isn't stored 1:1 from similar frames in an encode.
>>
>F00D uploads a torrent
>it's unregistered

F00000000000000000D
>>
>>52207119
He's got another day of ban senpai.
>>
>>52207119
>F00D is still b& for ~6 hours

F00000000000000000000000000D
>>
>>52207079

If you're encoding the frames at equal quality, then 60 frames takes up twice the space as 30 frames

I don't understand how you can look at it any other way. And I have both 30fps and 60fps copies of a few files, and the 60fps files are double the size.
>>
>>52207129
>>52207131
Wait what? He's really b&? Why?
>>
>>52207131
>>52207129
>>52207119
Not banned anymore guys working on it.
>>
>>52207149
b& from the 4chin shitposting
>>52207150
or maybe not
>>
100% TayTO will be GP. It's transparent and smaller than ZQ
>>
>>52207138
Are you actually retarded. Frame 28341 of a movie is almost identical to 28342 of the movie. Do they take they each weigh the same in the final encode? No you retard.
>>
>>52207119
>deleted by F00D: broken torrent file
>>
File: agtyrw.png (379 KB, 1320x974) Image search: [Google]
agtyrw.png
379 KB, 1320x974
>>52207025
>most JAV are released as ~5GB WMV files
Yeah, a few years ago maybe.
>>
I have a sneaking suspicion oppaitime = reddit

I suspect that if you call them 'cunts', they wouldn't let you join because you used a bad word that offends their sense of superiority
>>
File: 1451747598234.png (176 KB, 494x468) Image search: [Google]
1451747598234.png
176 KB, 494x468
>>52207221
>>
>>52207213
What site?
>>
>>52205949
>deblock=1:-1:-1
>ref=16
>bframes=16
>mbtree=1
I mean, you tried i guess
>>
>>52207221
Fe
>>
>>52207249
m-team

>>52207221
ot was literally founded by 4chan users and it got most of its initial user base from /ptg/
>>
>>52207138
>>52207199
followup from a different anon: if your 60fps copies of 30fps shit are literally twice the size, the encoding's fucked, maybe set so that every frame is a key frame -- that or you're using MJPEG
>>
>>52207221
Lol, you are extremely retarded and also new.

Keep posting. So we may laugh further.
>>
>>52207221
I went to this site but there's no register button. How do I register?
>>
>>52207364
Bait?
>>
>>52207378
?
>>
>>52207439
Like is this your first time here or what.
>>
>>52207445
Yep
>>
>>52207455
So there is no way to register. It's a private tracker, you have to be invited or get in through an interview - which most trackers don't have but OT does.

If you go and ask for an invite with no clue what OT is by the way you have less than zero chance of getting in.
>>
>>52207364
show e-mail ;)
>>
>>52207466
Interview for a hentai site? Do these guys think they are important or something? What do they ask? What's your favourite cock suck scene?
>>
>>52207486
Well they could just be like 99% of the other PTs and not have interviews at all requiring you to get an invite. But sure, get upset about it.
>>
>>52207213

Interesting, but I'd have to see it to believe it

Post a screen showing the level of detail if they have them in the torrent description - or if you have any of these JAVs yourself

After all, they might have just recorded at the equivalent of 5GB quality, and made a high bitrate file out of it (as I discovered to my dismay recently when I downloaded a supposed '4K' resolution JAV)

>>52207199

I guess that makes some sort of sense, I will have to look into it later
>>
>>52207190
FUK YOU the ONly our GODLIKE AHD has transparent encoDES! Only GoDLIKE AHD internals are trasnpirent you CUNT. Curry ptp should trump ANYTHING else1 AHD! AHD! AHD!
>>
>>52207592
Please stop the circlejerk this isn't reddit.
>>
>>52207592
Why are you so buttmad that /ptg/ likes a good tracker?
>>
>>52207602
Fuck off cunt AHD is the greatest tracker ever creaetd by GOD himself
>>
>>52207613
please answer
>>52207610
>>
>>52207602
>>52207610
Don't fall for such obvious bait.
>>
>>52207613
>Why are you so buttmad that retarded cultists from /r/trackers/ circlejerk on one specific tracker in /ptg/?

Fixed, my fellow redditor.
>>
>>52207643
>>52207610
>>
>>52207631
It's not bait, he's genuinely upset that people like AHD and I'd lke to know why.
>>52207643
Oh, it's because he's some assmad bigBoy from reddit. Colour me suprised.
>>
>>52207602
Circlejerking AHD is SOP for /ptg/
>>
>>52207534
motherfucker i encode jav
have 3 pastebins of bdinfo, then please stop posting.

http://pastebin.com/xwBzuiaf
http://pastebin.com/khVYuQ42
http://pastebin.com/425ruVQL

>>52207592
Because they make pretty good encodes, almost all releases on AHD are of better quality than fucking HANDJOB encodes.
There are not realy any better HD trackers (and dont say HDBits as they share encoders)
>>
>>52207684
>almost all
...
>>
>>52207691
the ones that are not good are generally a symptom of all available sources being trash.
>>
>>52207704
Fair enough.
>>
>>52207684
>Because they make pretty good encodes, almost all releases on AHD are of better quality than fucking HANDJOB encodes

My fellow redditor, there are plenty of other encodes, not only AHD internals and Handjobs. Ask /u/312c to enlighten you on this matter, don't embarrass yourself.

>There are not realy any better HD trackers (and dont say HDBits as they share encoders)

I hope you're baiting, fellow redditor.

>>52207669
>I have nothing to say, but AHD! AHD! AHD11

Nothing new.
>>
File: 1408215790957.jpg (94 KB, 500x401) Image search: [Google]
1408215790957.jpg
94 KB, 500x401
>>52207684
>Torrents: 22,321
>90% - mainstream shit

>There are not realy any better HD trackers
>>
>>52207684

Post a screen so I can compare the quality to what I'd get with a 5GB JAV
>>
>>52207733
Just stop man. You use the same style of 'lmao ironic' shitposting every day and it was weary and cringeworthy the first time you tried it.

Trust me implicitly when I tell you that nobody likes you a month later either.
>>
>>52207759
>comparing apples to oranges
jeasus christ, not only do you not know your x264 you also do dumb shit like this, please leave.
>>
>>52207764
Just stop man. You use the same style of 'l've got nothing to say, so I'll just continue circlejerking with my brother redditors' shitposting every day and it was weary and cringeworthy the first time you tried it.

Trust me implicitly when I tell you that nobody likes you a month later either.
>>
>>52207746
You're an idiot.
>>
>>52207786
All I did was ask why you were assmad about people liking a good tracker.
>>
>>52207791
Strong argument, m8.
>>
>>52207786
I like him :(
>>
>>52207803
If your definition of a good HD tracker is one that has shittier encodes but 5x as many you're wrong.
>>
>>52207802
>>52207643
>>
File: comparison.png (2 MB, 1920x1047) Image search: [Google]
comparison.png
2 MB, 1920x1047
>>52207784

>It's comparing apples to oranges

Yeah sure thing m8

Gee, I wonder why you're so reluctant to produce screens
>>
>>52207845
There's no retarded cultists circlejerking AHD in /ptg/, it's all just you sperging out every second thread. In fact, I don't mean to alarm you but you actually started this whole fucking conversation about AHD.
>>
File: 2016-01-03-203614_887x745_scrot.png (605 KB, 887x745) Image search: [Google]
2016-01-03-203614_887x745_scrot.png
605 KB, 887x745
>>52207860
>cropping to the only part of your encode with detail and not leaving the completely fucked to hell bit

:^)
>>
>>52207860
Coming from the guy refusing to post source/x264/his265 comparisons.
>>
>>52207819
Good trackers have good library. AHD doesn't. Pretty simple. If you'll call it "(second) best tracker for HD internals of mainstream movies", I'll agree. Just don't say it's the best HD tracker overall, because it's okay tier at best and you look like circlejerking idiot saying this, tbqh.
>>
>>52207905
AHD does have a good library it just doesn't have all the niche shit you apparently want but probably actually don't.

That said it's second to HDB by a long shot, but it's still second.

(Not the guy who said it was the best originally btw, only last guy in chain).
>>
>>52207860
no I'm serious, you are retarded, it is hardly a comparison when you are comparing a 5GB source to a 20/40GB source of completely fucking different movies.
Where do you upload your x265 encodes anyway? emp? because i would quite like to take a look.
i'm currently shitposting from my phone, i will get back too you with screens when I'm at my desktop.
>>
AHD is breaty good but HDB takes the cake guys.
>>
>>52207863
>There's no retarded cultists circlejerking AHD in /ptg/

The shit you and your bros posted last 30 minutes shows the opposite, friend. I'm not even talking about your typical shit you spit out in each fucking thread. Time to stop shitposting.
>>
>>52207882

The point is that you can tell the difference between different levels of quality even if the videos are different - I only cropped it so they could be viewed at full res together
>>
>>52207929
>AHD is breaty good but HDB takes the cake guys.

I want HDB to be merged into AHD so we can have one HD tracker running Gazelle.
>>
>read BCG rules for the first time
>"It's called football"
I already know I'm going to like it there.
>>
>>52207951
But part of HDB's charm is not being gazelle.
>>
>>52207932
>The shit you and your bros posted

Who the fuck do you think I am? Where the fuck do you think you are?

You started the shitposting about reddit and AHD, as you always do. This is objective fact that can't be bent because your posts are just here
>>52207592
>>52207613
>>52207643

If you have complaints about reddit, take the TO REDDIT. Nobody wants to hear you whine about it EVERY FUCKING DAY.
>>
>>52207951
you mean PTP :^)
>>
>>52207918
>Torrents: 22,321
>AHD does have a good library

Nah, mate. Not even close to a good library.

M-Team: 100k+
HD-T: 80k+
Bit-HDTV: 80k+
TTG: 130k+
HDB: 150k+

Even PTP has more HD torrents.
>>
>>52207951
AHD is still missing PTP's features though. I can search by rating, country, language in PTP, The trailers are cool. PTP is much more readable than AHD.

The content of HDB, AHD in PTP's gazelle would be cool. Some content does end up at PTP, but not all.
>>
>>52207974
I have complaints about retards sitting here and circlejerking on one specific tracker, that's all.
>>
>>52207987
PTP has more HD torrents than HDB. Doesnt mean shit.
>>
>>52207987
I'm talking about only the uploads worth downloading though. If you drop all non internals from every one of those sites - yes I know AHD would lose a lot too - you'd see a much more level playing field.
>>
>>52207987
M-Team is preaty much all BD and such
HD-T is meh
>Bit-HDTV
literaly who?
TTG
>See Above
HDB is great
and PTP has them because people upload content from everywhere too it.
>>
>>52207968
>part of HDB's charm is not being gazelle.

You mean a weakness
>>
>>52208032
Not him but I reaaaaallllyyyy wouldn't want HDBits to move to gazelle.

HDBits just werkz, fast, 100% of the time and I love it for that.
>>
>>52208013
Who cares what you personally think is worth downloading? I might as well say that all torrents on any of these trackers are worth downloading (including AHD), that doesn't change anything. We're talking about libraries that good overall trackers have and AHD, sadly, doesn't.

>>52208015
No one asked your opinion on these trackers, mate, stop shitposting. Once again, it's only examples of really good libraries, some of them.

>>52208010
78,053 to 157,541, but maybe I filtered them wrong. Means everything, actually. When someone says "this tracker is best HD tracker" this should mean "this tracker has a great selection of movies for everyone's liking in best quality", not "this tracker has a decent selection of quality internals of mainstream movies".
>>
>>52208083
>>HDBits just werkz, fast, 100% of the time and I love it for that.

Yeah, but the organization is shit.
>>
>>52208132
>Who cares what you personally think is worth downloading? I might as well say that all torrents on any of these trackers are worth downloading (including AHD), that doesn't change anything. We're talking about libraries that good overall trackers have and AHD, sadly, doesn't.
Piratebay has a bigger library than all those trackers.
>>
>>52207860
you don't have a fucking clue what you are talking about do you?
>>
>>52208143
HD content, no it doesnt.
>>
>>52208207
It does it's just not good quality or well seeded :^)
>>
Is ltconfig a meme?
>>
>>52208226
LOL.
No.
>>
>>52208226
placebo
>>
Is CN a decent tracker?
>>
>>52208294
With the sole exception of HDB and BTN, all the ultra-hard, ultrasekrit, super-elite to join trackers are utter shit.
>>
>>52208317
CN is really easy to join desu
>>
The.Martian.2015.720p.BluRay.DD5.1.x264-IDE.mkv

Freeleech gold popcorn PTP

get in lads
>>
>>52208226
If you are racing. it is very useful. If you are long term seeding, it doesnt matter.
>>
>>52208334
>720p
>>
Is Feralhosting any good for seedbox ? I mean the lowest plan with 1Tb disk space or is it shit-tier ?
>>
>>52208354
>720p!
>>
>>52208357
for long term seeding it's ok. For racing get SSD slot
>>
>>52208354
>bothering for 1080p for a movie as shit as the martian
im just doing it for the buffer nigga
>>
>>52208333
Didn't they used to be super secret and exclusive?
>>
>>52208357
>mean the lowest plan with 1Tb disk space or is it shit-tier ?

It's meh-tier

good price though
>>
>>52208357
Good in all ways except racing. Their lowest plan is worth the money for sure.
>>
>>52208363
Tbh I already have the ZQ release because I was told it was a goat film.
>>
>join private tracker to download high quality obscure music
>only downloaded music that nobody downloads
HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO SEED IF NOBODY DOWNLOADS
>>
>>52208143
Yes, and it's good at what it does. But we're talking about HD trackers and overall quality, as I said, matters (but of course you missed that part). And AHD doesn't stand out in quality category, don't act like they have some crazy quality control and that's why it has small library compared to other good trackers, some of which I mentioned. It's just that people don't upload there as actively as they upload on these other trackers, because everyone understands that AHD has it's niche and it's not trying to be something bigger than it is. It has great internals and it has some nice selection of mainstream movies, but it's not a great overall HD tracker and there are other and better options. Not sure why is it do hard to accept for AHD cultists, tbqh. I regularly use 15+ trackers for movies and from my experience I can see only 2 trackers that stand out - PTP and HDB. Others are just good, AHD is among those.
>>
>>52208379
at best it's quirky interstellar for kids

entertaining but not very stimulating and apparently not true at all to the book.
>>
File: communism3.jpg (29 KB, 371x500) Image search: [Google]
communism3.jpg
29 KB, 371x500
I have 9 freeleech tokens left on what and I've run out of things to use them on.
Post the last album you snatched.
>>
File: nvApCZOm.jpg (10 KB, 320x320) Image search: [Google]
nvApCZOm.jpg
10 KB, 320x320
>>52208410
Muh shit taste.
>>
>>52208410
Give your last.fm
>>
How to get into Exigo?
>>
>>52208393
>I regularly use 15+ trackers for movies
For what purpose
>>
>>52208441
Though TPS
>>
>>52208441
Become uploader on Pedro's
>>
>>52208452
fuck tps
>>
File: AdvaiticSongsOM.jpg (71 KB, 259x259) Image search: [Google]
AdvaiticSongsOM.jpg
71 KB, 259x259
>>52208422
>34.69 MB
Kek, I'll use a token anyway
>>52208435
Don't have one. Just post stuff you like. More chance of me finding new artists this way.
Picrelated is a great album.
>>
>>52208472
Not him but you should definitely get last.fm or spotify.
Last.fm records what you listen to on anything for recs.

Spotify records your listening history so it can come up with recs. Pandora, Deezer, any online service can also come up with recs depending on what you like.

After a week or something chuck your listening history/tracks into stuff like this:
http://spotlistr.herokuapp.com/#/search/lastfm-toptracks-similar
Or play their library, likes. And farm music from similar artists/tracks.
>>
>>52208471
Then fuck your opportunity to get into Exigo I guess?
>>
>>52208506
>yes good goy, let us collect your personal music preferences and likes, it's for your own good, don't you want good recommendations and non-intrusive relevant ads being served to you?
>>
>>52208521
That's the price you pay for /mu/.
>>
>>52208472
/torrents.php?id=54096
/torrents.php?id=212998
/torrents.php?id=77590
/torrents.php?id=8444
/torrents.php?id=30252
Here you go, some random albums I snatched
>>
>>52208471
That is where E staff are. Becoming popular in Pedros and making friends with ETMs in what are the other paths.
>>
>>52208506
>Streaming music
Why are you in this thread?
>>
>>52208542
How else do you discover music to download?
>>
>>52208362
>>52208369
Could you clarify what is racing exactly ?

>>52208367
Mind to elaborate ?
>>
>>52208549
Mostly 4chan threads tbqh. Also from friends.
>>
>>52208507
Unless I get an account.hush hush like
>>
I'm not sorry for what I did
>>
>>52208571
>Mind to elaborate ?
Exactly what the other anon said. Good price for the storage, not the fastest for autodl racing though if that matters to you.
>>
>>52208580
>friends
;_;
>>
>>52208533
Thanks family, I'll have a look at them.
>>
>>52206162
>he can't get into those trackers by invite
kek
>>
>>52208571
>Could you clarify what is racing exactly ?
Setting up autodl to grab the torrent the moment it's released and trying to send more upload to everyone else that's doing the same than everyone else that's doing the same. With really good boxes you can get 8 even 12 ratio during its initial seed this way. Feral won't ever do extremely well because it's a shared box on a network with huge overhead. Dedis are where it's at for racing.

But for everything else Feral is honestly fine. Yes dedis will still do better at general seeding but not as significantly as with racing.
>>
>>52208594
>play games with people online
>someone chooses an album and we all start playing it at the same time
It's pretty gay tbph
>>
>>52208533
Ship that shit on /t/ faggot!
>>
>>52208615
Sounds fun anon.
>>
does jpop have an invites section?
>>
>>52208619
what
>>
File: indeed-old-sport.jpg (39 KB, 552x344) Image search: [Google]
indeed-old-sport.jpg
39 KB, 552x344
>>52208615
>>
>>52208664
What did he mean by this?
>>
>>52208677
Delete system32 folder to find out QUICK!
>>
File: 0WYfpM.jpg (305 KB, 1500x1482) Image search: [Google]
0WYfpM.jpg
305 KB, 1500x1482
>>52208410
/torrents.php?id=73102180
>>
>>52208694
POST IT ON 4CHIN /t/ you god damn nigger!
>>
>>52208722
Why?
>>
>>52208731
sharing is caring you son-of-a-bitch!
>>
>>52208741
Is this some kind of meme?
The person I was responding to asked for what.cd albums. If you want music then there's lots available on piratebay or whatever.
>>
File: question.jpg (79 KB, 1024x1207) Image search: [Google]
question.jpg
79 KB, 1024x1207
/ptg/ I hear there's private trackers on Freenet that are far more secure and hidden than regular private trackers. Is this true?

https://freenetproject.org/
>>
>>52208845
FreeCP is mostly dead (well except for the CP part).
>>
>>52208845
It is like i2p. Secure trackers, but no content. All universally dead.
>>
>>52208845
>>52208914
would i2p or freeneet even offer good speeds..i mean TOR is always crawling slow
>>
Is TehC down for everyone else?
>>
>>52208963
Yeah, they were designed for high bandwidth, unlike tor. Although it all comes to who is seeding, like regular bittorrent.

Tor was never designed for anything more than text.
>>
>>52208963
Pretty sure i2p is designed to work with torrents. The problem is barely anyone uses i2p and only a few of the people who do use torrents
>>
>>52207987
What about HDArea?
>>
>>52208995
https://www.reddit.com/r/trackers/comments/3z6su6/tehconnectioneu_forgot_to_pay_their_domain/
>>
Yo /ptg/
check this out...:https://torrentfreak.com/secret-lovers-public-and-private-torrent-sites-160103
TF wouldn't mention us those god damn cunts, like we some o=kind of rejects or something.
I'm like: everybody knows r/trackers are the cucks of p2p
>>
good morning /ptg/

currently sat on the toilet emptying my ass of liquid shit
what are we leeching today, anons?
>>
>>52209119
Jesus Christ... we raiding hard on everything trans on empornium, you in or out?1
>>
>>52209089
this happened last year too kek

>TehC
>competent staff
>>
>>52209109
/r/trackers is cabal territory, /ptg/ is neutral land.
>>
>>52209132
>trans
no thanks, the only thing i leech off emp is cuckold porn (yes this is serious, not a meme)
>>
File: Pepe-The-Frog-Happy-04.jpg (24 KB, 495x495) Image search: [Google]
Pepe-The-Frog-Happy-04.jpg
24 KB, 495x495
>>52209144
/ptg/ is the place to be and you shut yo whore mouth
>>
>>52209166
It's the only place that hasn't been infected by the cabal shills from /r/trackers, the curry hordes from invite forums or the IPT mafia empire. Praise /ptg/!
>>
Anyone else getting Cloudflare errors on the AHD site?
>>
>>52209183
Dude I made the ipt /ptg/s are you nuts?!
>>
>>52209137
TehC is a tracker for retards too stupid to join PTP
>>
>>52209183
Just the occasional mratio and selling posts. No big deal.
>>
>>52209188
nope
>>
>>52209137

All the trackers are run by kids. Forgot about BTN backup issue?
>>
>>52209188
I have for the last two days when I tunnel through my VPS. Home connection works fine
>>
>>52209213
mratio faggots are clearly baiters and selling posts don't sound like /ptg/ regulars
>>
>>52209236
You clearly havent been reading the mratio and related posts. Half of it is bait, the rest are dead serious. Lurk more.
>>
>>52209219
>Forgot about BTN backup issue?

That wasnt that big a deal because they were getting DDOSed to hell and they stopped daily backups to keep the site running fast enough.
>>
>>52209213
Anybody who tells you that you can cheat on a high level tracker is rusing you to get you to lose your account.
>>
>>52209236
sellers on /ptg/ are a bunch of normie-tards
312cuck b8
>>
>>52209188
>muh AHD with better encodes than the sauce.
kek
>>
every single torrent in deluge shows as Paused now and I can't resume them, what the fuck
>>
>>52209328
>he fell for the dPausedmeme
>>
>>52209328
ltconfig overriding your max active senpai, bet you're running the seeding preset
>>
>>52209408
never used ltconfig
>>
>>52209379
>>>52209297
>> Turned backup off because of DDOS
>Like I said, kids that dont know what they are doing.
Deleting shit like a true 1337 cuck
>>
>>52209328
Typical Deluge, I got shit like that all the time when I used it.
>>
>>52209328
>he fell for the Deluge meme

kek what an idiot. at least you didn't go full retard and tried qStalledmeme
>>
>>52209449
hyyeeheheheheh
>>
Holy shit PlayOnLinux is amazing
Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 31

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.