[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
wew lad
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
Thread replies: 27
Thread images: 11
Anonymous
2016-01-02 08:23:11 Post No. 52186782
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 08:23:11 Post No. 52186782 [Report]
wew lad
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 08:24:51 Post No.52186799
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 08:24:51 Post No.52186799 [Report]
File: ssd.png (64 KB, 858x370) Image search: [Google]
ssd.png
64 KB, 858x370
Jelly, how is it compared to a regular SSD? Is it like making the HDD -> SSD switch all over again?
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 08:27:03 Post No.52186822
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 08:27:03 Post No.52186822 [Report]
>>52186799

Everything that isn't CPU dependent is basically instantaneous. Horribly optimized games like Ark will load in about 10 seconds; where it used to take considerably longer. Booting takes about the same though, I didn't see any difference between the boot time on this versus my 850.
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 08:45:04 Post No.52186975
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 08:45:04 Post No.52186975 [Report]
File: Bez názdsvu.png (33 KB, 402x367) Image search: [Google]
Bez názdsvu.png
33 KB, 402x367
>>52186822
Say this to my wd blue caviar raid0
I wouldnt store pictures/sensitive data on ssd anyway so dont really cate about reliability of raid0.
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 08:51:41 Post No.52187033
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 08:51:41 Post No.52187033 [Report]
>>52186975

wew
e
w
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 08:58:27 Post No.52187102
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 08:58:27 Post No.52187102 [Report]
>>52186975
How many drives in that raid?
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:00:50 Post No.52187137
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:00:50 Post No.52187137 [Report]
>>52187102
Just 2 of them
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:03:02 Post No.52187157
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:03:02 Post No.52187157 [Report]
>>52186975
Tfw 2tb of data for price of 250gb 850 evo
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:04:59 Post No.52187172
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:04:59 Post No.52187172 [Report]
>>52186975
a 500mib test fits into the ram cache of those drives, those are completely unrealistic speeds for a 2 drive hdd raid
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:05:32 Post No.52187177
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:05:32 Post No.52187177 [Report]
>>52187137
How the fuck are you getting that high reads then? That's what you'd expect from two SATA SSD in raid 0.
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:06:35 Post No.52187183
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:06:35 Post No.52187183 [Report]
>>52187172
>>52187177
And that explains it..
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:06:58 Post No.52187189
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:06:58 Post No.52187189 [Report]
File: Capt2ure.png (43 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]
Capt2ure.png
43 KB, 500x500
You guys even trying?
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:07:48 Post No.52187192
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:07:48 Post No.52187192 [Report]
>>52187172
64mb cache x 2 = 128mb. Not 500. It may be affected but the drives are already pretty good speeds. 7200rpm/sata3 btw.
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:08:51 Post No.52187199
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:08:51 Post No.52187199 [Report]
>>52186975
You must have something similar to Samsung Magician's rapid mode installed, because those speeds are impossible
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:09:57 Post No.52187208
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:09:57 Post No.52187208 [Report]
>>52187189
Nice RAM benchmark faggot
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:10:22 Post No.52187212
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:10:22 Post No.52187212 [Report]
>>52187189
>RAPID
nice try
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:12:16 Post No.52187233
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:12:16 Post No.52187233 [Report]
>>52187192
you're right, my bad
but it still affects performance quite a bit, a 5 GB test would give more realistic numbers
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:12:43 Post No.52187238
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:12:43 Post No.52187238 [Report]
>>52187183
>>52187199
1gb test yields the same speeds, will post screencap.
>>
OP 2016-01-02 09:13:40 Post No.52187248
[Report] Image search: [Google]
OP 2016-01-02 09:13:40 Post No.52187248 [Report]
File: uuuu.jpg (65 KB, 395x365) Image search: [Google]
uuuu.jpg
65 KB, 395x365
>>52186975

I downloaded CrystalDisk just for you.
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:20:08 Post No.52187312
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 09:20:08 Post No.52187312 [Report]
>>52187233
For sure and 100gb test even more but whats your average filesize?
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 10:40:44 Post No.52188204
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 10:40:44 Post No.52188204 [Report]
File: Bez snázvu.png (33 KB, 402x367) Image search: [Google]
Bez snázvu.png
33 KB, 402x367
>>52187233
5gb isnt an option so here you go
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 11:06:37 Post No.52188489
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 11:06:37 Post No.52188489 [Report]
>>52188204
i'm an idiot, i just realized i was looking at qd32 numbers instead of qd1
still, pretty nice speeds for an hdd setup
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 11:39:09 Post No.52188800
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 11:39:09 Post No.52188800 [Report]
File: Screenshot_2016-01-01_18-53-05.png (105 KB, 857x235) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-01-01_18-53-05.png
105 KB, 857x235
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 11:39:21 Post No.52188801
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 11:39:21 Post No.52188801 [Report]
>>52186782
Meh.

Been thinking of upgrading to a sm951 raid or something... but I'm pretty happy with my sata3 ssd raid0 setup
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 12:42:26 Post No.52189372
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 12:42:26 Post No.52189372 [Report]
File: Clipboard04.png (17 KB, 406x364) Image search: [Google]
Clipboard04.png
17 KB, 406x364
>>52186975

3x10k or 15k SAS don't remember RAID5
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 12:45:27 Post No.52189406
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 12:45:27 Post No.52189406 [Report]
File: Clipboard05.png (115 KB, 416x756) Image search: [Google]
Clipboard05.png
115 KB, 416x756
1. sys - very old 120gb Chinese SSD
2. storage - 2.5 1tb 5200rpm
>>
Anonymous 2016-01-02 14:18:35 Post No.52190475
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Anonymous 2016-01-02 14:18:35 Post No.52190475 [Report]
File: as ssd.png (45 KB, 1004x504) Image search: [Google]
as ssd.png
45 KB, 1004x504
Thread replies: 27
Thread images: 11
banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.