Why is it that iPhone scores higher in benchmarks but Android has better app performance?
Do you base your purchases off benchmarks you find online?
>>52186358
shitty programming I guess?
it's bit strange since iPhone uses C and Android uses Java
Because iOS apps rely heavily on single core performance while Android apps thread heavily.
>>52186403
Yes, that IS surprising. Do android do java well or is iPhone shit at applications?
That gif is literally more than 2 years old.
Saged.
>>52186403
I always thought Android got memed as lagdroid because of the JIT compiler it used.
Also wouldn't the ART runtime also speed things up a little?
>>52186405
Isn't single thread performance more important than multithread though?
>>52186469
>wouldn't the ART runtime also speed things up a little?
Dalvik literally compiled at run time.
ART compiles once after a fresh install or system update, after that when you open an app it's opening the binaries.
This still only affects app start up and not performance though, which doesn't really matter with how fast Java is on linux kernel.
>>52186469
Less if your apps are threading well.
The performance of each of your cores is important but it also depends on how the OS/apps utilize the cores.
If you have four fast cores but your OS/apps don't thread well then you probably won't see any performance bonus over a pair of cores, but if it does thread well then you may see better performance from four slower cores than two faster cores.
Android environment utilizes more cores better than iOS does. That's why Applefags always go on about single core being the important value while Android apps outperform them on more, slower cores.
>>52186403
Doesn't iPhone use their own compiler?
>>52186358
It's like you were born yesterday.
Apple has been cheating at benchmarks before /g/uro existed.
http://windowsitpro.com/windows-server/mac-vs-pc-2003-edition-are-apples-g5-benchmark-results-false
>>52186642
kek
>>52186685
>slower than netburst
YOU JUST CAN'T MAKE THIS UP
Microkernels are slower than monolithic kernels. This might have an influence.
>>52186907
>>slower than handicapped netburst with hyperthreading disabled
>>52187455
>>52186622
>>52186586
>>52186405
But how does the iPhone win in benchmarks?
I know this might sound stupid, but would screen resolution affect cpu benchmarks or only gpu?
>>52187515
The hint is on the screenshot you just posted.
The GPU on Apple's ARM processors are very good hence the high benchmark score. In the screenshot you posted, Nvidia, one of the leading manufacturers of GPUs, is at the very top.
>>52187561
But weren't apple fans posting a bunch of cpu benches trying to prove the new iPhone was faster than a laptop i5?
I just find it funny that a budget phone that is 3 years old is out performing top end phones that came out months ago.
>>52186630
apple's SDK uses clang, which is kinda funded by Apple, but is completely open-source and works on every platform imaginable
>>52187593
>apple fans
You already have the answer to your question. See the first highlighted sentence here >>52186685
>>52187635
>open source
There's your problem.
>>52187515
>onscreen
Part of the reason is resolution. See how low the 6 Plus is compared to the 6 and 5s?
The other devices in the list are older as well, mobile chips are pretty much hopping each other in terms of performance.
Resolution wouldn't affect a purely CPU bound benchmark but it will affect any onscreen rendering benchmark.
>>52187515
>why does a 1366x768 iToy run games faster than a 3K phone?
kek
>>52187599
Which phone?
>>52189075
I believe he means the 2013 nexus 5.
More like 2 years 3 months though, since it came out q4 2013.
>>52186358
I base my purchases on benchmarks that make Apple look bad.
>>52189210
Physics?
>>52186358
I hate apple but these tests don't usually prove much, usually just shows which phone is hogging the wifi.
>>52186358
That gif is like 2 years old, iPhone is consistently faster android now.
>>52190634
So you're saying the Wi-Fi potential of a smart phone is pointless?
>>52191055
Is it? I saw an app test where the nexus 6p beat the iPhone 6s plus by 6 seconds.
It's not a big gap, but it's still there despite the premium you pay for the fruit phone
>>52191055
>iPhone is consistently faster
>literally just search "ios 9 getting slower"
>hundreds of posts
>kek
>>52186403
Actually Android mostly only uses Java for UI. C++ for most actual shit.
>>52191235
Amazing proof.
How fucking stupid are you?
You can search any term and find thousands of results.
>>52191223
>Is it? I saw an app test where the nexus 6p beat the iPhone 6s plus by 6 seconds.
Nope.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtBHW5Nn2zI
>>52186358
Many things are designed to do well on benchmarks. IPhone is one of them
>>52191552
refer to
>>52191394
Because the apple's A-series processors are just designed for benchmarks, not real world usage. Especially since people love to use shitty benchmarks like geekbench. Apple just slapped a needlessly huge hardware crypto unit and laughed as they dominated the crypto tests of shitty phone benchmarks while providing zero benefit to the end user. Mac fags will quote poorly designed benchmarks all day long as long as Apple is wining them. But the ones Apple do bad in, like real world usage tests, they dismiss as meaningless.
>>52191632
refer to
>>52191561
>>52191394
well shit
>>52191394
>>52192383
Lol for some reason temple run in particular took 10+ seconds longer on android. In that same time span the 6P could load 10+ different apps. I have no doubt that for loading large apps, the iPhone's NVMe storage is a big advantage. But there's clearly a cross platform optimization problem there.
If you're going to do a head to head app loading speed test, you do one app at a time. You don't run 20 apps in a chain where the winner is essentially the phone that happened not to have a horrendously slow app crap out on it.
Even in that video though, system apps were simple faster on Android because the ridiculously long, superfluous UI animations on iOS. This has little to due with CPU speeds but software optimizations. In 9/10 apps, as shown in that video and in OP's, android is going to win simply because its designed to be a snappy, productivity orientated OS.
>>52192697
Even if there wasn't a 10 second delay at the beginning the iphone still would have won by a lot.
Android has faster navigation through system menus?
And it still lost by a fuck ton?
Savage.
>>52192964
Yeah, pretty much, android is going to be faster in everything but loading large games, simply because the iphone can load the data from storage faster. When you have a head to head test where the majority of the time spend is loading larges games with nothing in memory, the iPhone should theoretically win. Of coarse different levels of software optimization across platforms may affect this.
>>52193111
>android is going to be faster in everything except loading large games
Whatever helps you ease the dissonance, buddy.
>>52193264
It is based on the videos posted here.
>>52193373
They were dead even til the android locked up, then it was all down hill from there.
It's funny that you're even trying to bargain with the video that proves my point.
Truly rekt.
>>52186464
In the past two years, Android phones have only been getting faster and apple phones have stayed the same
>>52193533
That's wrong tho.
>>52191394
>>52193403
Where did it "lock up"? The video you posted shows android being faster in every application but a few large games. Like I said, the iPhone's storage has a substantial advantage in sequential read times, but that's about it. The iPhones SoC seems like it was built for geekbench, but still lags behind the latest android phones in most applications.
>>52193586
Keep telling yourself this while you finish a real world performance test a mile behind.
Keep trying to ease your dissonance.
You don't want these grapes anyways, trust me.
>>52192697
fyi they also load up temple run 2 twice on the 6p while its still running in the background the 6s.
>>52193697
Who even plays temple run seriously
>>52193697
>nexus has more RAM than he iPhone
>still has to reload the app
Terrible, just fucking terrible
>>52193726
Who even wants those grapes, seriously?
>gets btfo
>who even wants that game?
>you'd have to be a pleb to play they game
Wow man this butt hurt is real, level 99 shit.
>>52193743
That's a valid point, except they're loading 10+ apps in between, and you don't know if its loading higher res images for the 1440p screen.
Another problem is that loading temple run, a single app, is literally 1/3 of the 6P's total time in that test. For all we temple run 2 could just but coded like dog shit for android.
>>52193796
Who wouldn't rather have their phone be faster in 9/10 apps than just 3 times faster at loading one specific game they don't even play?
>>52193800
I'm sure it is coded like shit, they let anything into the google play store lmao
Another reason to go with Apple, even the apps are better made.
>>52193839
LMAO if you think Apple should be the ones to judge how well written any particular app is. Their own shit is so jurry rigged to shit it only runs because they only have to support one hardware platform. (hence why iOS updates for older devices are so broken and poorly optimized)
>>52193839
>GOYS
>GOYS
>BUY MY IPHONE
>IT'S FAST AND FULL OF AESTHETICS
Yeah no thanks, fine with my android pal.
It does what it needs to and iOS when I used to use an iphone, was slow, clunky, buggy, and even would fucking reset the phone because some apps wouldn't close. With Android phones just buying a shit phone will provide a shit experience.Buying any Iphone will provide a less than optimal experience. :^).
>>52193839
Yes, you're right, because everyone should love letting a corporation be in charge of "approving" every single app they have access to. That could never end up with said corporation taking advantage of you.
>>52193971
>what is a jailbreak
You can have it both ways.
>>52193839
>>52194016
So wait, once post later and now you're saying the approval process isn't a good thing? And you talk about cognitive dissidence...
>>52194016
>done by the consumer
what the fuck does that have to do with them approving apps kek
YOU jailbreak your device and it's considered warranty void when you do.
>>52191318
>coming from the guy who posted no proof of his claim either
>>52194064
If you want apps made by pajeet, you can have those too.
I don't.
I want shit that just works, which is why I use an iPhone.
>>52194071
>not just factory resetting and then getting your warranty back
Who the fuck is stupid enough to bring s jailbroke phone into an Apple Store for warranty work?
>>52194098
What claim?
>>52194111
apple shill please go
>>52194128
This one: >>52191055
>iPhone is consistently faster android now.
Are you slow?
>>52192697
>>52192964
>>52193586
>>52193726
>>52193831
holy lel, even with the 13 seconds it took to load temple run on the nexus removed, the iphone still rekt it, just timed it myself.
time with temple run included on iphone 59 seconds
time with temple run REMOVED from nexus score, 1:04
FUCKING REKT.
Even with the worst loading game removed from the nexus, the iphone still blazes past it.
>>52194285
>7.8% speed difference doing something that is only relevant to 12-year-olds
>rekt
>saying rekt
>being 12 years old
>>52194520
>>7.8% speed difference doing something that is only relevant to 12-year-olds
>7.8% after completely removing the worst offending app from the competition.
It's much much much worse if the temple run was kept in, which would be fair since that's part of the test for every phone.
Pretty much every post in the thread so far just got disproved by that.
Stay mad tho.
>>52194592
>doing something that is only relevant to 12-year-olds
>I just did timed it myself with my iWatch! DISPROVEN!!! l0l XD
>>52194721
>nexus tried to do that same thing
>takes 3x as long on top of already being slower
Fuck that's gotta hurt.
>>52194742
Every time I play temple run, I'm just like WOW I should have bought an iPhone.
>>52194111
>jailbreak iPhone
No warranty
>unlock nexus bootloader
Reset it and take it in for warranty
Of course the iPhone just werks, until you start updating it.
>>52196425
idk pham my iphone 5 still works great on ios 9
>>52197454
>iphone 5
>2015
Your battery life must be absolute shit.
>>52197659
>Your battery life must be absolute shit.
Nah, it's really not.
I bet it would be even better if I replaced the battery too, this one is still the original.
>>52197454
I'm on 9.2 and having severe battery issues ever since updating.. Anyone else?
Is the moto g 3rd gen any good for an off contract phone?
>>52198036
Yeah but you can get better chinkphones.
Did you check the xiaomi mi4i?
