New battery case, for car dudes!
Does anyone actually wonder if this is proof of their down fall? What do you think their next misstep will be?
>>52175991
To be honest the case doesn't look that bad, its just the principle of paying to have acceptable battery life when they made the phone so thin in the first place.
>>52176018
haha sure, Abdul
>>52175991
in the time it took you to write, spell check, upload and post your "opinion" they made more money than you will in your entire lifetime.
downfall he says...
>>52176018
>the case doesn't look that bad
oh yes, it fucking does
>>52176018
>the case doesn't look that bad
>>52176060
I am no apple fan, but I can bet Jobs would have shot all this shit down
>>52176073
>>52176060
>>52176049
I think it looks comfy
Zealots will (and do) claim that literally everything is proof of their antagonist's downfall. I bet if archives went back to around 2009/2010 you'd see that zealots on /g/ were predicting that the iPad was proof that Apple had lost its way. The same was true of literally every iPhone and the MBA and practically every other device they announced and/or updated.
For a VERY long time, /g/ was full of people who honestly seemed not to understand the idea of a rMBP and how the screen handled scaling. They would talk about how stupid 2880x1800 is on a 15" display because the mouse would be too small to see, etc...
This is the kind of delusional irrationality you're dealing with when you deal with a zealot; everything is proof of their downfall, and nothing ever proves to be so.
That being said, I think the battery pack is pretty ugly, and I would much rather a case try to keep the same general form (or silhouette?) as the host device. That means making the whole back flat, even if it means adding a few millimeters to the whole device's depth, would be preferable to a camel hump sort of thing.
>>52176138
in the time it took you to write, spell check, upload and post your "opinion" they made more money than you will in your entire lifetime.
and you're shilling for them totally for free...
>>52176103
I think apple fans and anti-apple zealots are pretty much in agreement on this. i honestly think that the people defending it (at least the fervent ones) are just trolling.
there are folks who are saying it doesn't bother them much, and I buy that those people are "real", but apologists are not new to any entrenched argument.
>>52176161
In the time it took you to post your hair-brained conspiracy-driven post, the illuminati have taken over yet another country's banking system.
>>52176018
This
>advertise how thin ours phones are
>give them shit battery life
>sell an external battery pack that double the thickness of the phone
Should have just made a thicker phone.
>>52176018
>doesn't look that bad
Mate, it's a fucking lump on the back of a phone. It even extends the ridicoulus size of the phone in height. It looks like a fucking fisher-price-tier toy.
>>52176270
nobody until now has complained about the height. the objectionable part is the hump. every battery pack case extends height pretty much in this way.
>>52175991
Charging the car.
>>52176205
>shit battery life
It's still better than most android phones lmao
>>52176319
source? Apple probably paid for the article.
iPhones are famously bad for battery life, all the normies even agree with their memes.
Fast phones though pham.
>>52176369
do you really not recognize the anandtech logo?
I'm pretty sure a handful of other sites that bother to record battery lives of myriad devices report more or less the same things. They may not all report the same numbers, but (again, roughly) similar rankings.
>>52175991
I prefer this design over the huge bricks like Mophie makes. I had a replacement back like this for my Galaxy S2 and it was a lot nicer than the ones that made the whole back larger for no reason.
If you want to point out apple's downfall, the pencil is pure pants on head retarded.
>>52176411
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/oct/06/apple-iphone-6s-review-camera-3d-touch-screen-faster-processor-fingerprint-sensor-rubbish-battery-life
http://www.theverge.com/2015/9/22/9368415/apple-iphone-6s-iphone-6s-plus-review
even iVerge says 'battery life could be better'
kek
>>52176450
>shit battery life
>still better than most androids
Damn that's gotta hurt.
>>52176317
Thanks for the mild chortle
>>52175991
>>52176049
>>52176060
>>52176073
Not him, but I seriously don't get the big deal. I had a replacement back like that for me galaxy s2. It looked way better than the backs that extended out over the empty areas for no reason.
The whole idea of a battery case seems bad to me, but if you're going to do it, this is much better than the ones like mophie that bulk up the areas with no battery.
>>52176476
http://www.gsmarena.com/lenovo_zuk_z1-7511.php
£230
twice the battery life as an iphone
wew lad
>>52176515
Notice what's number 1 on this chart here
>>52176319
>>52175991
The point of this thing is that its much easier to slip on and off than other cases.
I don't get the fuzz at all.
>>52176450
I feel like I framed the discussion clearly enough with the
>sites that bother to record battery lives of myriad devices
part. the guardian isn't even primarily in the business of reviewing tech devices, and the verge doesn't show comparisons at all. "Battery life could be better" applies to literally everything with a battery.
This screenshot surveying iphone 6 battery life and comparisons shows the highlighted bar (usually the iphone 6) pretty consistently shows up in the top half. I could go scouring every one of these reviews to post the sources for you, but a cursory glance says that battery life is around middle of the pack or better, and I don't think it's controversial from this skim.
>>52176562
Mophie has twice the capacity, cost the same, is just as easy to install, and looks way better.
If an apple logo is ypur main consideration then maybe you should just slap a vinyl sticker on a mophie.
>>52176533
2 rupees have been deposited in your applel affiliate account pajeet
>>52176599
>he thinks the 1715 mAh battery in an iPhone will last longer than a 4100 mAh battery in an android
>>52176629
>gets rekt
>calls me an indian
Kek I love this shit.
Also,
>4000mah battery
>still less battery life than a phone with under 2000mah
Fucking what?
>>52176599
>the iphone 6s+ has a lower browsing battery life than the iphone 6+
Progress, people.
>>52176707
Where do you see this?
My chart above says otherwise, by a large margin.
>>52176657
1) that's not what I said at all; I said that the iPhone tends to come in around the middle of the pack or better, so unless you're saying that all android phones have >4100 mAh batteries, you're trying to make some insanely retarded claim about the android device with the biggest battery representing the entire range of android devices.
2) I'm pretty sure that my bike light's battery lasts longer than a smartphone's battery. making a one-dimensional claim the way you did is retarded unless you qualify it by taking into account that the iPhone is lower-powered.
>>52176707
you're misreading something in that screenshot or something.
>>52176727
Look on the left, second one down.
>>52176810
>"lower is better" right there in the pic
Learn to fucking read kek
>>52176772
>he thinks even the 3100 mAh battery in a £100 China phone wont at least last as long as the 1715 mAh battery in an iPhone
>>52176864
Second one down you dumbfuck tripfag, you're looking at the third.
>>52176867
>6s plus gets 12 hours battery life with a 2900mah battery
>lelnovo cuck Z1 gets 10 with a 4000mah
Nice one.
>>52176892
Dude are you blind, that's the same fucking chart I posted here
>>52176319
>>52176060
Literally nothing wrong with this. What you want are more adapters and complications. Any small thing to laugh at apple about because you're poor.
>mfw retards actually bother arguing with pajeet
ayylmao
The thing is that Apple products are still so vastly superior to their competitors on the software side that they can afford to make mistakes for a couple of years.
>>52176920
Which shows the iPhone6+ as having a longer browsing battery life than the iPhone6S+
>progress!
>>52176966
>vastly superior
ayylmao
>>52177018
dat dual core speed
>>52177003
>still BTFO of everything else in the entire chart, with all of their phones in the very top of it.
Wow, blazing victory.
Meanwhile 4000mah batteries get you 10 hours of battery life and a 2900mah gets me almost 14.
Very nice.
>>52177003
Also,
>battery in 6s plus is slightly smaller than 6 plus
>phone benchmarks twice as fast
>still damn near equal battery life
I'd say that's pretty fucking legit.
BTW, check this out.
All these icucks arguing about battery life can't even hotswap their batteries. Have fun being a cordslave.
>>52177223
>things nobody ever does with their phone
But you do it right?
Nobody, exactly.
>>52176657
It doesn't matter because android consumes battery life inefficiently and with your octacores, it ain't gonna last long. Besides, you don't leave your house.
>>52177266
>tfw you go from 5% to 100 in 4 seconds
>>52177146
>6s plus benches lower than my note edge in antutu
What a piece of shit.
>>52177337
>that laptop
>that carpet
>that running board and wall
>that picture quality
How's the poverty?
>what is a power bank
Battery benchmarks made by "professionals" are simply a race in which wins the company who shills and pay more. Any phone with less than 4000mah CAN'T HAVE 10 OR MORE FUCKING HOURS OF BATTERY LIFE WITH THE DAMN SCREEN ON YOU DUMBFUCKS. Same applies for samshit and huewei obviously. You must be really dumb to even pretend to shill with this "benchmarks". The only reviews I trust regarding battery life are the ones made by this guy youtube.com/watch?v=e54PJEaXN7o
>>52177367
My house is valued at 350k and will be paid off next week. Big Ben goes to my gym. I'm not poor, I'm just not a cuck.
>thinking a wire and quarter pound weight attached to your phone is as convenient as hotswapping
>>52177438
>literally all he has left is hotswapping
lol you're done son, stuck in the corner
>>52177438
Just think about it, you spent 350k on your house and 200 on your laptop, and you probably use your laptop more than your house.
>>52176051
and so fucking what?
thats a pretty retarded logic senpai
>>52177337
Anon, is that an S4 battery? If yes, what charger is that?
>>52177453
I dont care about anything else. I dont need to watch 720p cartoons on my phone and my canon takes better pictures than a mobile phone ever will. Wealthy people dont compete over phones, that's what watches and cars are for. Any cuck can sign a 2 year contract and make the 70 dollar payment every month.
>>52177473
Yeah, I do. I run a small online company. Wife made the choice about the house. I would have prefered something smaller, but we got a great deal from a buyer that was about to get foreclosed on.
>>52177541
It is. Its just a generic one from amazon. There's also a larger anker replacement battery that has something like double the capacity.
>>52177548
>letting females make choices
top cuck
>>52177548
>Any cuck can sign a 2 year contract
Nice assumption, but no.
I only buy in cash.
It's cool that you don't use your phone for anything, but other people do.
You're the minority, continue being so.
>>52177582
She cleans it and raises the kids in it, so she got to choose it. I could care less.
>>52177591
95% of iPhone users only use candy crush, facebook, and instgram. Don't feed me shit about how people all these computing resources for a facebook machine.
>>52177575
Damn, I checked those, but I thought the battery would be too big.
I'm getting awful SOT on mine (1 1/2 hrs) no matter the battery.
>>52177671
>95% of iPhone users only use candy crush, facebook, and instgram.
Which is still doing more than you do.
Damn.
You could just get a phone that has decent battery life and not even have to hot-swap.
I can go 2 days without charging my phone, most days I don't go below 90% battery and I use my phone to listen to soundcloud at work all day.
>>52177671
Care to share a pic of your mom's basement?
>>52177703
How many batteries have you tried? The oem samsung batteries are like 9 dollars on amazon.
>>52177732
My wife has an iphone 6s and she has to charge it twice a day. I'm not stupid.
>>52177747
3, Tried changing roms, kernels, only using the phone on powersave at no improvement.
>>52176772
>Implying that the iPhone is comparable to middle of the road Android products and is actually nothing special
>>52177821
That's odd. What applications drain your battery the most? Can you post SoT screencaps?
Why the fuck didn't Apple just make it taper off to the edges?
>>52177972
because Material Design©
>>52176953
Having extra $1000-$2000 to spend doesn't make you rich, poor applelfag. Wasting money on badly designed overpriced shit doesn't make you rich either.
>>52177940
Today's one of the days that It has given me the most. Even though I have Greenify and Amplify, it is most of the time awful.
>>52177772
Sure she does ;)
>>52178048
The s4 only has a 1920x1080 screen. That's not a Samsung S4.
>>52178092
A full charge lasts her 9 hours of moderate use. There's no anyone could stretch that out to two days without severely gimping its Features©.
>>52178017
I love how butthurt /g/ gets about Apple
>>52177732
>>52178092
Sure it stays at %90 all day
>>52178174
same desu
>>52178174
>>u poor? xDDDD
>presented with an argument
>>umad xDDDD
Nice logical replies you got there
>>52178170
Uhh... You do know that You can join three screenshots and do realize that there's a white space on the bottom that takes the ~30 pixels ?
I used paint, the white bar didn't seemed a problem
>>52178017
>>52178227
Why do you feel the need to make a thread everyday that you can't afford apple? Yes, apple can't into mouses but bashing the whole company when they obviously are popular for their great user experience is an indication of jealousy.
>>52178227
That was my second post in the thread, cuck.
here >>52177972 is my first
You must have some deep seated insecurities.
>>52178245
Sorry senpai, the orientation was throwing me off. Check out the Samsung oem battery. Also, try using a battery testing app to see how man mAh are left on the battery.
>>52178295
>implying I created this thread
>implyling I care about a company's situation
Apparently having a negative opinion on a product of a company makes me a fanatical hater if that company.
>>52178298
>I'll just call others poor and don't write anything logical
You are trying to defend the bad design choices of a company and calling the ones who don't agree with you poor. I don't think that I'm the one with deep insecurities here m8.
>>52175991
Why is it a fail?
One piece design so there's no cap to lose.
Battery doesn't block the antenna, plus contains passive antennas to help with the signal.
Informs the phone that it's plugged into a battery, so unnecessary background processes aren't activated.
Apple chooses form over function and faggots lose their shit. Apple does something that leans in the opposite direction, and faggots still lose their shit.
>>52176138
They're like the fucking tea party.
Obama:democrats:tea party::Jobs:Apple:faggots
>>52178542
The thing is it doesn't even give you a full charge, costs $100 and an ugly bulge. People are losing their shit because its only advantage against other cheaper alternatives it the logo on it.
>>52178542
>people that hate jobs are faggots
Brandfags are the worst people. Your loyalty should be to good products, not a company's figurehead. The same with your opposition.
>>52176051
faggot
>>52178398
Yeah, I'll see if I can find one battery that has the same size, but keeping the price reasonable.
>>52179462
Amazon has them for 7 dollars straight from Samsung. Worst case scenario you'll have to shell out 100 dollars for a new one on ebay.
>INOVASHUN
>>52176060
The pencil was the worst one by a long shot
Why the fuck didn't they use the magnetic thing that powers the keyboard to recharge it? Or at least made the lightning connection on a 90 degree angle
>>52175991
When macfags start going off about industrial design, I point them to this kind of shit.
>>52177473
>you probably use your laptop more than your house
I'll give 20 paypal bucks to the man who can come up with a more retarded statement than this one.
>>52180604
I love mac products.
Now give me my paypal shekels.
Guys, the iphone 6 plus has god tier batter life. For the first 2 months. I own one, been using it since february last year and it current gets me around ~2.5 hours screen on time. I honestly wish i bought anything else.
>>52180694
>>52180604
He's got you there. Pay up man.
>>52176369
I thought this too but I just bought an iPhone 6 and it kicks my Note 4s battery life's ass. By a mile. I get 6-7 hours of screen on time a day. It's baller.
>>52176270
>>52176310
>>52175991
its...fucking ugly. Which is not exactly what Apple is supposed to be known for...
>>52183980
>Which is not exactly what Apple is supposed to be known for...
u wot m8
>>52183900
See.
>>52181389
>>52177671
>I could care less.
>could care less
>could
