>Microsoft products are secure they said
>Linux
>company
>unlabelled charts
>>52175463
they counted the vulnerabilites in ubuntu. since ubuntu does not use software much different from other distros, you can deduce that gnu/linux is more secure in general
>>52175403
>the most widely used products have the most security vunerabilities
>fedoracore shit nobody uses has none because nobody gives enough of a fuck to exploit them
No shit, sherlock.
>>52175463
GREENTEXT ABUSE IS SHILLING
>...
>muh security through obscurity
>>52175515
ubuntu is pretty much the least secure distribution with all the bloat and unnecessary shit they add in
>>52177145
And yet it's far more secure then windows, OSX or adobe shit
>>52175403
>Apple/Microsoft
Releases large softwares (OS)
>Adobe
Has a large software library suite (adobe suits)
Mainly releases tiny cloud softwares.
>Mozilla
Medium sized programs like web brower
>GNU/Linux OS
opensores benefit
>tiny softwares like wireshark/mediawiki/openssl
tiny amoutns of bugs
Looks accurate to me. This looks like the predicted model.
>>52175403
>popular software and services are more targeted than who-gives-a-shit ones
Wow, nice lecture professor Reddit
>>52177280
>GNU/Linux
What is that?
>>52177431
A meme
