whats a a better secure search engine?
>google duckduckgo
Yahoo! for entertainment news and Bing for porn.
read the god damn sticky
>>52173432
That information is shared with any website unless you block it, test with this page:
https://panopticlick.eff.org/
>>52173432
Startpage
Duckgo >gooogle
>>52173529
>tfw it's almost impossible to get rid of fingerprinting
blender is ass
>>52173563
Chameleon + Adguard Stealth Mode
>>52173607
>windows
please go fuck yourself you fucking wintard
>>52173563
https://addons.mozilla.org/es/firefox/addon/canvasblocker/
>>52173815
>>52173563
sorry, i read incorrectly
>>52173432
that image is completely retarded. what the fuck?
>>52173563
How unique was your fingerprint?
>>52173674
What? They are addons
https://github.com/ghostwords/chameleon
https://github.com/AdguardTeam/StealthMode
Duck&DuckGo is your jewish friend
duckduck it, Goy
>>52174888
>https://github.com/ghostwords/chameleon
Sure, you have a unique IP
That unique IP has a different agent that is the same from the list provided by GITHUB/CHAMELEON
This way you're more recognizable.
>>52173432
Yandex or mail.ru are the way to go
>>52173432
You're a fucking idiot OP.
Your image is stupid.
Displaying your user agent info and IP from your request != storing it.
>>52174966
According to panopticlick I am less recognizable, see image. Also, my IP is dynamic and I usually make use of VPNs. The useragent is changed by Stealth Mode
IXQUICK.COM
>>52175072
at this point I can only agree with you
>>52175072
Limited supercookie test:
bits of identifying information
1.85
one in x browsers have this value
3.59
HTTP_ACCEPT Headers and User Agent were given, nothing more because javascript is a no-no
