does /g/ trust Kingston products like memories and SSD?
if not, what products do you trust?
Intel, Samsung, and Crucial.
I'd rather have a Silicon Power ssd than Kingston
>>52109168
SanDisk is pretty good too. They have been making flash for a long time, before SSDs entered the market.
The only product of theirs I can wholly recommend is their headset
>>52109234
>>52109188
>>52109216
>>52109239
I am actuallt looking at their ram since they are much more cheaper than others. I knwo in the past that their stuff tend to break down faster than others so I was wondering if they been improved these days
>>52109168
>SSD shadiness: Kingston and PNY caught bait-and-switching cheaper components after good reviews
>http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/184253-ssd-shadiness-kingston-and-pny-caught-bait-and-switching-cheaper-components-after-good-reviews
Just recently got some Kingston USB3.0 memory sticks which are garbage. They're slower than my old USB2.0 sticks which have been written to a thousand times.
What this anon says >>52109188
Never had a prob with Intel, Samsung or Crucial.
>>52109168
fuck kingston
also
>failing for the solid jew maymay
Everyone uses PNY, that's where it's at: The best SSDs and memory sticks, the coolest looking GPUs and how can I forget the friggin' SD cards, 256 GB?!?! Trust me, I'm a gamer!
I trust their ram more than any other brand, they used a cheaper nand controller in their V300 series which is fucky but understandable if you consider the price bracket of the product (it's a budget SSD so it needed to be cheap, doesn't excuse giving a different controller to reviewers though) and I don't really care for their flash drives.
Crucial and SanDisk are great price/performance for SSDs, I hear good things about Plextor and OCZ as well but they're pricey. I wouldn't trust Samsung SSDs even though they're stupid fucking fast because of that TRIM thing on Linux.
>>52109168
I have a Kingston economy-grade SSD in my server as the boot disk and it's rocked along for 3-4 years. No signs of wear and tear.
YMMV.
>>52109581
>the coolest looking GPUs Trust me, I'm a gamer!
How can anyone argue against that?
