Intel Skylake
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
> HURR DURR IT'S BENDABLE, THAT MEANS IT'S TRASH HURR DURR.
oh no its bendable, that means you can't stick your 500 lb dildo on the side of it and throw it across the room, oh no. It's not like it's an amazing CPU or anything, nah, we only care about if the CPU can fucking bend or not. Jesus christ kill yourself Haswell cucks.
>>52107094
>It's not like it's an amazing CPU or anything
it is amazing, op, but unfortunately it under performs to several older gen chips that cost less
this is what buyer's remorse looks like
NOCTUA FAGS ON SUSHI WATCH
>>52107128
Correct and once again OP is a faggot.
>>52107128
Like which ones? Mine performs better than any Haswell one.
>>52107175
>>52107153
Ahhhh the Haswell cucks are attacking!
>>52107183
4790k BTFOs it in all real life conditions
stay salty
We need more threads as hilarious as this one. /g/ is too serious.
>>52107183
see: >>52107254
5820k outperforms it also, barring high overclocks, but it's in a different class
for a while 5820k also cost less than both 4790k and 6700k
>>52107254
>Plays gayem with friend, same ram clocked speeds, same GPU, he has haswell, I have skylake.
>Gets more frames than he does.
"Real Life Conditions"
>>52107472
>make up story on 4chan
>try to stop sobbing quietly
Enjoy your lower single thread performance you fucking morons.
Benchmarks don't lie
>>52107493
Oh no, it's retarded
>>52107575
Finally, someone who isn't a haswell cuck.
>>52107094
7.5/10 - Did LOL
>>52107597
*mainstream cuck
ftfy
>>52107575
None of these test show what kind of RAM was used which affect failout 4.
>>52107695
this
>>52107695
You're the blame if you're still using slow ddr3
>>52107794
lol
>>52107575
>Benchmarks don't lie
no, but they can omit information to make, say, newer cpus appear better than older generation cpus that will perform better on *HEAVILY* cpu dependant games
it's almost like if the 5820k were included in yours it would make the 6700k seem like a bad deal
>>52107887
>>52107911
![1409277623606[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/nWDaOY9.jpg "1409277623606[1].jpg")
>>52107887
>FX-9590 gets BTFO by a fucking i3
>>52107930
pic related, delicious skylake cuck tears
>>52107575
Fucking AMD
get it together, goddamnit.
>>52107944
>FO4 can only use two threads efficiently
quality coding right here
>>52107887
>>52107911
>buy k series chips
>bench them on stock clocks
Not even attacking you, those benchmarks are literally worthless. With such a small ipc increase of course an older processor that's clocked 500mhz higher would be faster.
>>52107695
HOW THE FUCK. DOES RAM AFFECT GAYMEN PERFORMANCE FOR FO4!? I've seen tests elsewhere proving this. It makes no sense. Vydias use gpu vram for the most part NOT system ram.
I have an ivy bridge i5 3570k with a mild overclock (4.1Ghz @ 1.19v).
Would I notice any difference if I upgraded to a newer CPU?
All I use my PC for is playing modern games @ 1080p 60fps and shitposting on the internet. I'd like to get into higher res gaming soon though.
>>52108027
VRAM is used for rendering the video output, the actual game runs in the system RAM since all the non-graphics related calculations are done by the CPU still.
>>52107979
parallelization isn't that simple, you can't just make anything utilize more cores, it's not just some checkbox you click
>Not still using Sandy Bridge
>Using a CPU that uses toothpaste as the TIM under the heat spreader
>>52108149
>a toothpaste cpu is faster than sandyvag
lmfao
>>52108109
Then why does a game like gta iv run relatively the same on almost all types of ddr3 ram?
>>52108282
Because they managed to optimize the engine properly.
>>52108124
BUT it can be done. The devs have to work their asses off, yeah.
>>52108059
No. Upgrade your GPU instead (not that you mentioned what it is).
>>52107980
>With such a small ipc increase of course an older processor that's clocked 500mhz higher would be faster.
fair point, however you'll note in the second post you linked to, >>52107911 , the 5960x comes out on top despite being 500mhz slower than the two in second place (granted 8:8 cores vs 5820k's 6:6 and every other's 4:4)
>>52107930
shows that fo4 effectively uses all the cores it can get
not to mention the benchmarks here >>52107575 have the benchmark scores in order of clock speed, 4.5, 4.5, 4.5, 4.5, 4.0, 4.0, 3.5, 3.5
the 6700k and 4960k might come out similarly with similar clock speeds due to the same amount of cores, but the 5820k should come ahead as I was trying to point out
>>52108149
5820k is soldered :^)
>>52109259
This thread isn't about x99 you self centered shithead
Also
>28 lanes
Hahahahahahahaahah
>idiots bringing up their PC game """benchmarks"""
I cringe everytime.
>>52109312
This, when will the "muh gayming rig" meme die?
>>52107575
Wut? This whole chart is bullshit. I get between 40 and 60fps at 2k with an overclocked 8350 and Fury X in fo4.
Btw Zenfag lurking. Gonna be a long wait.
>people argue over CPU architecture now
Jesus
>>52107577
i3-6100K outperforms i3-4370 and costs $15 less. Checkmate Lockedfags.
>>52107128
>states it's an amazing CPU
>backs up their claim by stating it under performs to several older gen chips that cost less
So which is it?
>>52108282
He explained it. Do you need it laid out to you in retard?
>>52109341
PClab's cpu charts are completely bogus - they ALWAYS have a 9590 below an i3 regardless of game when reality plays out very, very differently.
Gamegpu (i.e the other drunkards) paint a very different picture in their FO4 cpu testing.
>>52108368
Only because DX is basically unthreadable. The effort that has gone into the likes of cryengine and frostbite to get it to scale under DX11 is staggering a there are only a few other game engines out there even close to that level of multi-threading capability.
>>52107094
Lmao OP doesn't realize that it is the start of a new technology that will progress over time, most likely doubling in tech about every two years. They probably just had to pay back the investors op, calm the fuck down
Why have CPUs pretty much stoppee innovating when it comes to gaymen support
>>52112589
because GPUs are the bottleneck these days and AMD can't compete in the high-end CPU market
>>52108059
3570k is still in the top CPUs available (sadly)
