![Deluge-logo-icon[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/mZFypRJ.jpg "Deluge-logo-icon[1].jpg")
Is this the best torrent client for windows?
>>52063442
qbt is good too
inb4 >stalling
uTorrent 2.2.1
T
o
r
r
e
n
t
2
.
2
.
1
Your picture is spot on, op
>>52063816
>literally installing maleware
lol
>>52063442
Absolutely
T i x a t i
i
x
a
t
i t a x i T
>>52063442
no, qbittorrent is
deluge is ok though
utorrent (every version) and tixati are shit
>delooge
useless bloatware
>>52063442
Transmission-qt in my opinion, but Deluge is fine too I guess. Don't remember why I didn't like it very much.
> le duge
2.2.1
>not using vuze
fucking pleb
deluge is bloatware.
do they still install a daemon service that runs even when the main program isn't?
qbittorrent is the way to go.
qbittorrent
not deluge because >>>python
>>52064355
No it doesn't install it m8
>>52064172
I use it
>>52064355
I use deluge to access a friends seedbox, its buggy as shit.
It regularly crashes, whereby it won't open unless I kill all deluge processes.
If I open multiple torrent files at once, via deluge, a bunch of them won't be opened properly.
Currently, if I add two torrents at once, the second torrent will end up in an unknown void after download is complete and I have to manually use the 'move storage' function to put it in the completed directory.
It also used to have a thing whereby a small number of .torrent files wouldn't open, unless I add them via the add torrent file dialog.
>>52064355
Deluge is not bloatware, its the lightest bit-torrent client you can find. enjoy your shitty vuze
QBittorent has good functionality but the GUI design is horrendous, literally fisher price,
I want a client that doesn't check the payload after you hit pause/stop. So I can move the payload but still have it in the client.
>>52063816 is legit the only one that does it.
>>52063442
yes
Tixati reporting in.
>>52064287
Kek
>>52063816
Installing very out of date, network-facing programs is a terrible idea.
>>52063816
Enjoy your vulnerabilities
>>52064672
>So I can move the payload but still have it in the client.
Deluge has this, just right click the torrent you want to move and hit move storage...
>>52063442
No it's vuze-extreme-mod...
deluge can't sort torrents by date completed
pisses me the fuck off
halite
>>52063442
You're already using closed source software as base of your system (winblows) it doesn't matter whether you choose to run open software on top of that. It doesn't matter if you choose to run uTorrent™, or some open source /g/ recommended software. Your whole system is already vulnerable. The whole reason /g/ recommends that software is because of freedom. But you running Windows shows that you don't really care about technological freedom which makes you just a stupid normie.
>>52064557
>works on my machine
>>52065916
I have these same issues across about 3+ windows 7 machines.
>>52065926
Only used it on 8.1 and 10. Always worked without issues.
>>52065740
you can sort by date added
![1386959480103s[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/jvFhDmS.jpg "1386959480103s[1].jpg")
>>52065839
RuTorrent
>>52063442
Vuze + Abuze Mod
tell me something faster than utorrent 2.2.1, tried deluge its slow as hell
>>52071889
faster what? downloading? same with all clients unless you misconfigure them.
>>52071924
not download, runtime. i am really got along with utorrent it starts like less than a second but deluge is taking time
>>52071960
Deluge is a bit heavier, but overall a better client, especially for the initial swarm
>>52071889
>>52071960
some of us like our softwares crapware free
enjoy your bitcoin miner/adware
>>52072026
utorrent 2.2.1 is crapware free
>>52071960
never used deluge on desktop. qbittorrent starts instantly, has all the features, is FOSS, gets regular updates...
>>52063442
yep it is. i especially love how i can set upload limits and how i can have it stop seeding as soon as the full download is completed
>>52064172
>>52064536
Literally /mlp/ cancer bloated crapware
Deluge is good but has a few quirks. I've noticed it randomly uses CPU for a while even when it's supposedly idle. The other thing I've noticed is with torrents with multiple trackers. It'll contact one at a time and attempt to retry a few times if it fails before attempting the next tracker, which in turn means nothing happening for a while. Whereas other clients will contact most if not all available trackers at once.
QBT is also generally good, but I've been a victim of the stalling thing despite there being no good reason for it happening.
I'd rather not use any Windows client that is closed source, CLI only or relies on dbus-daemon. AFAIK this covers just about every halfway popular client.
qBittorrent
Transmission-Qt. No bullshit just a simple easy to use torrenting client.
qBittorrent is cool too...
>>52063442
Yes, that, qBittorrent, or Transmission.
Next time, check the archives.
it stinks
>first get into torrenting
>nyaa says to download Vuze
>literally changed my default search in Chrome to Yahoo after running it for awhile
aria2c
r
I
a
2
c
>>52063800
Haven't had any problems with qbt so far
It really is the best client for botnet10
