ITT: Post your new year resolution
1366x768
:^)
Fuck a swift just copped the dell equivalent
>>52042075
3840x2400
2560x1440
1080p; lowest acceptable imo. Discuss.
No native resolution CRT master race.
1280x800
>>52042314
second
hopefully 2k by the end of 2016..
3440x1440
1280x1024
>pls no bully
>>52042293
1050p is pretty okay I guess
Current: 1366 x 768
New Years: 2560 x 1600
Desktop Resolution is 5440x1080
>>52042314
Daily reminder they have triad amounts or stripe amounts determined by their pitch.
I'm CRT master race but they have "Native" resolutions.
1920x1080 is extremely common, right?
>>52042075
Why does Asus quality control suck so much ass?
>>52042293
>Discuss
I wanna discuss dem titties. Damn.
>>52042075
2560x1440, 60fps
If i get this new job i'm getting a 144hz IPS 1440p monitor
If not, i'll get a laptop and travel through Asia for a while, just to escape the life i hate
bought two dell ultrasharp 24inc 1080p monitors, happy with my purchase, they look great
>>52042075
1366x768
59 Hz
>>52042416
If you're broke, or just like 1050p, I have no issue with you. I have a Dell 2005fpw and it works great with pretty color.
I just bought that monitor yhe PG279Q its fuckin amazing
putting together my new build
i5 4690k + r9 390
to play everything at 1080p 60fps
>>52042660
>59
Are you using a console?
>>52042455
still way better than the scalers lcd use
2560x1440
Been using a dell u2711 since 2010
Really want 3440x1440 with gsync though -_-
>>52042745
>not buying a 980ti
>>52042863
Sure, they scale a lot better because of the way they work. Absolutely. But they have a limited top resolution.
>>52042075
1920x1200 + 1366x768
2880x900
>16:10 mustard race
acer xb270hu
>27"
>2560 x 1440 144 Hz
>IPS panel
>4 ms
>G-Sync
>>52043227
>acer xb270hu
Looks so ugly tho.
buying a tv for my dad.
should i get an lg or panasonic for a confirmed lg ips
or play the samsung panel lottery and most probably get the beijing optoelectonics va panel?
2560x1080
At least if it arrives after new years.
>>52042075
1440p, 4k whenever new gpu's drop
>>52042075
800 x 600
1600x2560
1366x768 right now, mid 2016 I'll be 2560x1440 27 inch ips 165 hz gooeyness
>>52042314
This, I have 1920x1200@100hz for day to day use and 1280x768@160hz for counter strike.
1080 x 1200 on a chink phone
>>52042075
>tfw wanting this monitor in Australia
Anything 16:10
Golden ratio is better
only use 4:3 Easier to get headshots in shooters that way
>>52044967
>16:10
1920x1080 24" IPS, that's jist about the sweet spot for dpi.
>>52045686
Why mention IPS?
>>52045700
it isnt standard yet.
>>52045700
Because I used a TN prior.
current: 900p
new years: 1440p
i am ready
>>52042075
2560x1440, though I got it last year. Won't be going any higher than this though.
>>52045548
>>52045746
>>52045762
>>52045770
>>52045772
>>52045781
I don't mind when you man children make a post that has an anime picture, or a reaction post.
But when you spergs shit up normal threads with this crap, then I'm sorry, but it isn't on.
Go back to your anime boards if you want to post this content, or get back in the >>>/trash/
>>52045723
>>52045743
Why does the screen technology matter when the thread is about resolution and dpi?
>>52045786
Hey, I made that picture~
>>52042281
Second, shit's pretty sweet.
>>52042243
s2716dg? is it good?
>>52045772
>>52045837
>>52045876
STOP SEXUALIZING THE AWOOS FOR THE LOVE OF CUTE THINGS
1920x1920
Finally got one for Christmas.
>>52045934
mods, ban this cancerous thread
not related at all with technology
>>52045941
that thing looks like a beast for programming, pretty shit for everything else though
>>52046027
It's also perfect for looking at globes
1440x960
>>52046022
keked
>>52046098
merry christmas :3
>>52044967
Current: 1050p+1080p
New Years: 1080p+1080p
7680x1440, same as last year :(
>>52045941
I want that for Photoshop 2bh. Seems comfy af.
>>52046166
When you order 3, you get the pictured qt for free
>>52044911
I always thought aus would get tech for cheap since they're closer to the countries that produce it
>>52042075
3440x1440
>>52046524
>1440 vertical
Haha
>>52046240
Literally the only reason to get a 1:1 monitor as a consumer is this. Getting a triple screen set-up and making sure they're all flush to one another in a gentle curve.
But even then, most people don't need two screens, let alone three.
>>52046118
Holy shit
>>52047312
>consumer
Please don't use that word
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Consumer
1440p 144hz
>>52047390
>only 1440 vertical
>>52047384
but everyone knows what I mean when I say consumer. Citizen sounds wrong in the context and individual can have the wrong implication. When we use the term consumer in this context, we are typically referring to a home user as opposed to an enterprise user.
I agree that consumer can carry the wrong connotation.
What would you suggest as an alternative for this context?
>>52047516
Don't talk to feeetards. Consumer is the official terminology used by companies.
320x200
>>52047516
Computer user
or just user
>>52047522
I was merely humoring him since I've seen him around on this board and I'll never dismiss on opportunity to improve my lexicon.
I agree that consumer has a negative connotation but in this context it is correct so I was merely curious if there were any adequate alternatives.
>>52047569
Too generic. Too long.
>>52047599
User = 4 characters
>>52047611
>Too generic.
>>52042075
>phone
1440x2560
>laptop
1366x768
>desktop
2560x1600
1200x1600
>>52042075
Actually got that screen last year as a gift. Was gonna buy it myself and ended up getting it as a present, definitely worth the price. Only downside is ebin gaymer branding
>>52047658
>PG279Q
no you didn't
1920x1080
Might get a 4K screen for the new GPUs next year if they come down in price.
>>52047390
is it good?
Search more, lurk more, git gud.
>>52047751
My Dad works at Nintendo and got it for me early
>>52046105
>>52042075
3840x2160 + 2560x1440 + 1200x1920
1920x1200 + 1920x1200 + 1920x1080
2560x1440 25"
2560x1440 60Hz + 1920x1080 120Hz
3840*2160 @ 60Hz.
And the SLI to use it.
More money than sense reporting in, now I'm looking for a 144 Hz screen.
1280x1024
No bully
Monitor: 1920x1080 + 1280x720
Phones: 2560x1440 (x3)
Tablet/laptop: 2736x1824
Watch: 320x280
Nice meme!
>>52047751
Oh didn't realize. I've got the PG278Q, still happy with it. I'm guessing this one has IPS?
1920×1080 60hz
Hopefully upgrading to 1440p later in the year.
1920x1080 forever and always
It's the same as last years: 1280x1024, times two
I'm thinking of copping this one. Anyone who got it and can tell me how it performs?
BenQ XL2411Z by the way
its still 1080p but at 144hz now, finally can run Games at actual 120fps with vsync.
>>52047871
it's in the mail
>>52042470
Good question. Got one of their routers, dropped all clients every couple minutes. Got a replacement and it's pretty much perfect.
105dpi
Definition is not resolution you fucking retards
>>52051328
Bought one a few weeks ago, so far it's pretty sweet.
Nothing bad so far.
>>52042075
good ol 2560x1440
>>52051890
>Windows 10
>Watching Hentai
>Almost 2016
>>52042075
1280x800
>>52052037
yo i'm sorry about the windows brah, i need to get muh gnus on this machine but i ain't even watching hentai you dumb ass nigga except for that one tab, but that's besides the point nigga errything else is just moeshit cuz that's the realest shit nigga
1920x1080 144hz
>>52042075
>1280x1024 on desktop
>1600x900 on main laptop
>1280x800 on ultraportable
maybe I'll pick up a nice 1600x1200 monitor some day
>>52042075
2560x1440.
I'll probably stick to this resolution until something in the 4k 120Hz adaptive sync range becomes reality.
I might buy a 1080p monitor just for gaming, though.
>>52046118
Saved that image. Top quality.
>caring about resolution when 80% of your computer time is spent looking at text
literally why
3440x1440, if the monitor ever turns up.
>>52052272
Because text looks better and is easier on the eyes on high ppi displays
>>52042745
Same exact build.
Bretty good so far no complaints.
>>52052272
text and information processing on a flat panel at 1024x768 or lower is suffering
Just got myself a 24" 1200p monitor, girlfriend!
>>52042132
>using the smiley with a carat nose
>>52047390
>TN
Absolute dog shit.
>>52042281
God tier resolution, coming through.
Also have a 900p drawing monitor
>>52042243
So TN for the same price of a IPS Swift? You sure got them good.
I bought a cheap ultrawide monitor not long ago so 2560x1080
Both happy and sad. Happy because the monitor I replaced was 1680x1050 and TN. Sad because I went from 120hz back to 60. And because I needed a new PC and I am poor
1920 x 1080 at 24 in
1920 x 1080 at 40 in
Same as last year
>>52043227
This, god tier.
2560x1440 is the minimum you should have. If you're under this, then you might be a poorfag.
Honestly though, you should be looking to move on to 4k.
>>52055160
well fuck it because my computer is able to run games at 1080p ultra 30fps
any higher and my shitbox would explode.
but hey i built this thing 4 years ago and it still works
>>52042075
2560x1440 @ 144Hz IPS freesync.
>tfw I'll never have 3 40 inch 4k monitors
>>52043227
how is it?
I currently have 3 1440p monitors but want to get a 144hz one, and thats the only one I could hope to justify purchasing (the asus IPS 144hz is $1200)
any dead pixels? discolouration? black light bleed?
>>52052197
>using the smiley with a carat nose
Desktop:
1920x1200+2*1280x1024
Laptop:
1680x1050
Tablet:
1280x800
Phone:
848x480
Retro PC:
800x600 max
>>52051328
i got this on last year black friday for 250 (canada) , it works fine and the colors are really good when calibrated, i got it beside a 21:9 AOC ips panel and the only difference is the contrasts/colors are a bit better on the ips
>>52042075
1080p until I can get 4k adaptive-vsync/freesync in a 24 in. size at a decent price and quality
2x1080p @ 144Hz and 240fakeHz
1x2560x1080 @ 60Hz
>>52042075
5760x3600 aka 3 x 1920x1200
>>52042132
Same. Looking for 1440p and not trash
>>52042075
x2 1440p ROG Swift
>>52042638
Story?
1920 x 1080 @144Hz
>>52042638
I backpacked in some parts of southeast asia via land and water. Greatest memories 2bh. Lots of unesco heritage sites too. backpacking/10 would do it again.
>>52042075
1920x1080 TN 60hz and was already refurbished 5 years ago when I got it
>parents dont want me spending more time on my computer so wouldn't get me a new monitor even though it was only $200
>I'm not even a fucking weirdo neet, I'm a college senior about to graduate and move out
God I fucking hate normie attitudes towards technology
>>52042075
6 1920x1080 monitors in a 3x2 grid.
Effectively 5760x2160 for a fraction of the price of what a 4K/5K would actually cost.
Not to mention it's doesn't suffer from shitty dpi scaling.
>but mah bezels
barely an issue when you buy monitors withs lim bezels.
80FPS Ultra GTA 5 4K gaming. Spent 2k so far, only 4k to go lmao...
>>52044878
>1920x1200@100hz
this would be my dream
>there are no 1080p monitors above 60hz that aren't TN pieces of fucking shit
It's 21:9 worth it?
>>52042375
>falling for the ultrawide meme
2560 x 1440
60 Hz though. I actually got this monitor back in 2012 when 1440p was uncommon and just started to come out widely on the market. I am considering getting a high refresh rate monitor with G-Sync at some point. I want to get a better TV first though.
>>52042075
3840x2160@60Hz now, UHD@120Hz plus Adaptive-sync as soon as the monitors hit the streets sometime in Q4.
Current: 1920*1080@59Hz
It's an old entry-mid tier BenQ 24"
I'm very, very tempted to grab a QNIX QX2710 (2560x1440). Are these shitty meme monitors or are they actually the holy grail of cheap panels?
>>52043007
No point playing at 1080p.
1920x1200
16:10 masterrace
3840x2160
5760x1200
I get the benefits of 16:10 glory as well as widescreen at the same time. The only thing imperfect about this setup is that they're not 144Hz Freesync, but I can't be bothered to sacrifice my 16:10 and wallet for those features given that VR will eventually be better anyway for gaming, while 3x16:10 will always be fantastic for daily usage/productivity.
>>52062523
Define "productivity"
>>52062560
shitposting
