What does /g/ think about Architect? I tried it in a VM to get some experience with installing arch in general, and it simplifies the process without severely limiting your choices. Just look at a guide for tips and you’ll be fine.
I just went full retard and installed Manjaro KDE
no problems so far
>>52011728
I'd like arch devs to adopt the installer.
They had the exact same framework a few years ago, I wonder why they dropped it
>>52011766
You could've installed manjaro minimal though.
>>52011728
Anyways if you are looking for a summary of the Beginners' wiki:
>>52011728
Archetict Linux is the "purest" vanilla arch distro right now. It doesn't add/modify any extra stuff to your installation like Antergos does. It's more like a way to save time typing out commands now.
I thought it became deprecated in favor of Evo/Lution installer
>>52013729
It's more like the other way around.
>>52013727
It's not a distro though. It does what antergos, as a distro, fails in horribly - Installing vanilla arch, with a stable performance
>not being able to install arch normally
I'm a fan, it's great if I just been to get up and running, anyone know if it has support for LUKS and LVM yet? This is the obly reason I opt for a traditional install atm.
>>52013815
yea i need architect to support luks, then i will use it
>>52013724
Make one for gen2
>>52011728
>new/recent project
>hosted on sourceforge
THERE IS NO PUNISHMENT SEVERE ENOUGH