amd is destroying nvidia in every dx12 benchmark coming out.
looks like all that extra vram amd has been giving away virtually for free will come in extra handy next year when dx12 starts to get pushed and hardware is actually used.
NVIDIAFAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH!
>>52010792
>980 ti still beating fury x at dx11 and dx12
>980 still beating 390x at dx11 and dx12
>NVIDIA FAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH
desu op I want it to be true but the evidence is not there.
>>52010792
inb4 amd releases dx12 drivers that lower the frame rate like they did with dx11
>>52010792
>amd is destroying nvidia in every dx12 benchmark coming out.
And nvidia is still destroying amd on DX12 games
>>52011854
>i make no sense
every benchmark is showing significant gains for amd...
also AMD just announced their own OPEN-SOURCE version of gameworks, to cuck nvidia.
>>52012438
>significant gains for AMD
>AMD trailing behind Nvidia even with dx12
I've been an AMD user for a while but even I can see you're full of shit.
Also AMD has no choice but to go open source with that shit since they're the minority in the market by a significant margin.
>>52010792
Why is AMD struggling to beat cards that were released months before them, using old technology and not fully implementing DX12 driver side yet?
It's a joke that AMD pretty much had to write DX12 themselves so MS wouldn't benefit Nvidia and Intel. Wintelvidia is a real thing.
>>52012438
dx12 benchmarks != dx12 games
Understand rajeev?
>also AMD just announced their own OPEN-SOURCE version of gameworks
They've always opensourced their libraries, remember tressfx? That was such a good library that everyone uses it! laughingsluts.png
Meanwhile devs are frothing at the mouth to use gameworks because it's not utter shit.
>>52014069
>Meanwhile devs are frothing at the mouth to use gameworks
Do you have a source for this information?
>>52014120
Try looking at how many gameworks titles there are, now compare that against how many have AMD tech.
There's your source
>>52014253
Rekt
>>52014253
Now compare it to those that use neither
>>52014253
>Try looking at how many gameworks titles there are
Lets also compareh ow many as broken upon release. Woops turns out its all of them.
Cool, now what are some games that use dx12?
>>52014973
well meme'd
>>52010792
Your screenshot of a game sponsored by AMD shows Nvidia beating AMD.
Even AMD telling the developers to use code that works slower on Nvidia hardware can't save them.
>>52010792
Look at this brain damaged fuck
Look at this mentally ill and delusion charity case
He can't even read his own graphs, the retard
>nvidia cards clearly still winning against AMD hardware, even if its by a sliver
Aww, poor little thing must have been dropped on his under-developed head one too many times
He can't even read basic information, the illiterate, mentally-challenged cunt
>>52015115
Meanwhile, in a gamesworks game....
>>52015161
>Gameworks: Off
Wake me when AMD can do tesselation with acceptable performance without burning down my house.
>>52015161
>turning gameworks off
top kek
>>52015161
That has Gameworks off, you delusional, mentally challenged idiot
>>52015178
>>52015191
>>52015203
All video card results are obtained on this exact system with exactly the same configuration.
All games are set to their highest quality setting unless indicated otherwise.
AA and AF are applied via in-game settings, not via the driver's control panel.
>>52015213
[citation needed]
>>52015221
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/R9_380X_Strix/5.html
>>52015213
Wow, he is so stupid and detached from reality that he still misses the point
Gameworks is turned off in those benchmarks, you brain-addled twat
If you even had two braincells to rub together, you would know that those benchmarks are garbage and inaccurate of how users would optimize their cards (i.e. not using a selling feature of nvidia cards, which is Gameworks)
Keep living in this lala land, this total fantasy world made up by your delusional mind that AMD is somehow better than nvidia in a tessellation environment, you absolute fucking retard
>>52015241
>Review says maximum settings
> "no it doesn't count because Nvidia is losing!"
>>52015291
>review also states that Gameworks is turned off
More delusional retards
>>52015322
Where exactly? It isn't on the page with the FC4 results and it isn't on the test setup page.
>let's fight over a 2fps difference
>>52010792
Wait... nvidia has worse perf in dx12 than dx11?
Feeling a little bad for buying a 980ti now.
>>52015487
Don't fall for the AMD shills. That is, unless you are one...
>>52010792
>nVidia losing performance with a new, more efficient, better API
HAHAHAHAAHA FUCKING KEK
They have to TRY to be this fucking TERRIBLE
TIPPITY TOPPITY KEKKITY
>>52015441
I agree, its closer to 10fps.
>>52012438
>every benchmark is showing significant gains for amd...
Which is irrelevant because 52 > 51.
Who gives a shit about relative gains? What matters is who's on top in absolute terms, and that's clearly nvidia.
>>52015536
AMD can't even get close to a gimped GM200 GPU. Fucking annihilated.
>>52015566
Ah but everyone on /g/ bought the 970 which is getting its shit kicked in.
>>52015536
thanks for posting this Anon, I'm glad that I picked the R9 290 which overclocks so nicely over the shit gtx780ti.
>>52015487
>>52015535
Nvidia focuses on something of actual value right now, dx11 multithreading. Ashes is by AMD for AMD, too bad they get rekt by GPUs using an older, less efficient API.
>>52015535
yeah which i find incredibly sad
though nvidia must be improving their dx12 performance because these latest benchmarks are better than the first round of benchmarks back in august. nvidia was really doing shit tier performance in dx12 then.
Yes nvidia is coming out on top. I think the whole point of the graph is to show each cards relative performance on dx11 vs dx12, in which case AMD would appear to have the edge (future thinking, maturation etc)
>>52015312
>Nvidiots blown the fuck out
>>52012567
Maxwell is just a much faster architecture than what amd is using. Hawaii is about equivalent to kepler in speed which they are still using. Maxwell is about 50% faster.
You think the shilling is bad now wait until Pascal comes out first as a Maxwell refresh with higher core counts.
>>52016745
>Maxwell is just a much faster architecture than what amd is using. Hawaii is about equivalent to kepler in speed which they are still using. Maxwell is about 50% faster.
ITT we have total ignorance of how gpus work and could not begin to fathom the differences between maxwell and kepler, let alone hawaii, tonga and fiji.
You are doing /g/ proud.
>>52012480
except devs actually want open source toolchains and not buggy black box bullshit.
it's like you don't belong on /g/ or something...
>>52015536
>Black Ops 3
worst console port this year
wew lad, you just posted a bunch of pointless shit
>>52015578
This is why I love /g/
There are actually people here who spend 1000+ on PC parts and then top it off with a fucking 970 lol.
>>52016745
Have fun paying $900 for a minimal performance boost.
>>52016922
Yeah gp 100 will be a rip off, 30% over a stock titan x. Not so impressive when you can get $500 used 980 ti then.
Mid range like the cut down 204 is going to match fury. Hopefully it wont be $400.
>>52010792
>>52016999
This is 290X if you can believe it.
optimized my jpeg
>>52011494
proof?
>>52016999
I want one, but they are gone.
>>52017053
They just got new stickers on them, they're not gone.
>>52017061
I dont want to pay price to new one. Theyre gone, cheap r9 290x's that is. Everyone is holding on to theirs for the reason you mentioned.
>>52017053
390X is 290X with 8GB of faster VRam and less shitty coolers. I'd still say MSI and Spaphire are the ones to get, MSI 390X cooler is godlike.
But "All batches" result with Crazy pre-set is around 26 FPS, it's 2FPS faster than 380 in OPs picture.
Also same configuration with 15.7 driver, IDK what's going on here.
yeah but how is everything going to perform in vulkan? Is AMD going to take 3 years to write a driver? Is NVIDIA going to light your house on fire the first week? Wait and see on the next exciting episode of /g/!
>>52017230
>vulkan
we'll know when it comes out eventually.
>>52016745
>Maxwell is just a much faster architecture than what amd is using.
why isn't it performing much faster then?
seriously, if you're going to shill, you should at least shill better.
Maxwell sees much less of a performance gain from overclocking than Kepler does, implying either heavy bottlenecks added to the design or implicitly lower performance per core.
In either case, Nvidia fucked up the design.
>>52017247
> lower performance per core
One of maxwell's big points is better per core effeciency over kepler (i.e less cores to do the same work).
>>52017264
literally all that means is that per core power draw is down, which is as easy as turning down the clocks on FP64, as they did with kepler before it.
>>52017247
>Maxwell sees much less of a performance gain from overclocking than Kepler does
lol NO
Stock 980 ti: 1200mhz
980 ti overclock: 1500mhz
25% clock boost and 40% performance increase
All while consuming almost no extra power because extra voltage does jack shit for maxwell.
>>52017379
Where does that 40% performance increase stat come from?
>>52017419
>stock: 100
>oc: 140
>>52017379
Right you have a huge gain in BF3 - a game that (for good or worse) loves Nvidia's hardware. If more games were tested you'd see a far lower overal gain from overclocking.
>>52017432
>implying stock 980Ti and Waterforce 980Ti are the same cards or the same chips
You're literally wrong.
>>52017452
Not my fault even AMD titles prefer nvidia's cock
>>52017485
>talking about battlefield 3
>brings up battlefield 4
yeah gj bud :^)
>>52017485
Nvidia titles prefer AMD hardware yo.
How many of you have or will change to Windows 10 just for dx12, despite they spying and shit?
>>52017454
I'll give you some leeway since you're an amdpoorfag: they're all the same chips. A reference 980 ti overclocks just as well as any non ref 980 ti. Overclocking in maxwell is all pure luck. Premium models doesn't overclock better unless they're specially binned like the KP. And KP is the only model that is binned.
>>52017502
I got my battlefield 3 free from my old 7970, it's definitely an AMD title
>>52017557
>I got my battlefield 3 free from my old 7970, it's definitely an AMD title
Its not. BF4 is.
>>52017577
Get fucked
>>52010792
>AMD Kucks on suicide watch every driver update.
>consumers using programming APIs to argue about GPU vendors
>>52017577
both 3 and 4 where amd sponsored titles.
>amd is destroying nvidia in every dx12 benchmark coming out.
yet you still use the same tired benchmark from months ago..
>>52012567
>Why is AMD struggling to beat cards that were released months before them
Why is noVidya struggling to beat cards that were released a year before them?
>>52017379
stock 980 ti is not 1200mhz, its 1000mhz.
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-980-ti/specifications
>>52015094
>>52015506
>more expensive cards are beating cheaper ones
>AMD cards are seeing a gain from DX12, Nvidia a loss
Dunno, seems pretty much what everybody should be expecting.
What about the benches of GTAV?
>>52017750
why can't amd faggots do a second of research before opening their stupid fucking mouths? 1200 is the stock boost clock for ALL reference 980 tis.
>>52017750
this ^^
which really shows how well maxwell overclocks. leads me to believe they did a intel. produce parts that can easily hit higher frequency, but ship them stock at "lower" speeds because they're still faster than their competitors and give a pseudo feeling of being great overclocking parts.
virtually all 980 ti's can hit 1400mhz out of the box. good amount can hit 1500mhz. that's 400 - 500mhz higher than stock. i mean my stock 980 ti boosts to 1.3ghz all on its own due to it being under water.
>>52017715
Because they're using less power to do it
>>52017792
ok? stock 980 ti is 1000mhz, op listed 1200mhz. he then randomly mentions 25% boost oc speed giving no indication he was talking about the stock speed.
and plus, if i'm a amd faggot by owning a 980 then i guess i'm a amd faggot.
>>52017824
you're grasping at straws. a reference 980 ti will only operate at 1000mhz only if it's over 86c and using 100% of the power budget. 99% of the time it will perform at 1200 with a 5mhz reduction every 1c over 86c. you dont even own the card i don't even know why you're talking about it.
>>52017816
Barely.
>>52017577
You fucked up buddy. It is. Googling stuff like this before posting makes it less awkward for all of us.
>>52010792
>this amd desperation
ha.
>>52011421
>just 1 fps
>OMG GUYZ, NVIDIA DESTROYING
>>52018135
That's not what he said though.
>>52017875
because op said stock clock was 1000mhz while nvidias own tech sheets show its 1000mhz with a 1200mhz boost?
>>52017379
>Stock 980 ti: 1200mhz
its 1000 mhz but ok
>25% clock boost
if this was his way to imply he was talking about boost speed then ok, but he really didn't make it sound that way. he just listed 1200mhz as stock 980ti then randomly mentions a 25% boost clock
and anyways why are you so butthurt? considering its stock is 1000mhz and can achieve 1500mhz easily is far better than being stock at 1200mhz and achieving 1500mhz. i was actually trying to point out it was better than what op listed but you went full freakout.
much like what this op said:
>>52017797
the 980 ti are indeed overclocking beasts and boost amazing well with temps in check on their own.
>>52018436
My two 980 Tis are humming along at 1335 MHz, I brought them down by 35MHz because of artifacting in one of my games. Memory won't overclock for shit, though, and I have no idea why.
