vacuum thread? vacuum thread.
Also, this bagless "cyclone" vacuum trend is fucking stupid. Bagged will ALWAYS outperform bagless. Lol @ retards spending over 400 dollars on shitty Dysons.
>>52010304
I hate you so fucking much
I'm giving my mom a vacuum for Christmas.
Also bags are so 1900s Op, my shark works awesome
>>52010506
As soon as I get a place of my own I'm investing in a roomba.
>>>/consume/
>>52010582
I'm going to get a Neato.
>>52010582
Anyone used one of these? Are they worth the $800?
>>52010582
>paying $300 more so you don't have to push it for 15 mins is an investment
>>52010582
you sound like the kind of person that complains about wage stagnation
>>52010672
I had a roomba years ago. Idk if actually did much as far as cleaning goes. It entertained the cats tho
>>52010506
That's the funnies shit I've ever seen.
>>52010304
I have some cheaper bagless vacuum cleaner
It works just fine but in retrospect I'd rather have one using bags because I spend so much time cleaning the bagless one
>>52010672
As a toy? Maybe. As a potent vacuum? Fuck no, it cant clean for shit, especialy of you have alot of furniture and animals
>thomas waterfilter animal pure
>german engeniering and build quality
>insane power
>no dust floating, no hairs stucking in cylinders, no containers, bags etc
>150 bucks cheaper than ricer mega uber cool dyson shit
