is i7 6700k a worthy upgrade from i7 2600k
Lolicon faggot
>>51976113
no
unless you have a lot of money and don't mind spending it
>>51976113
no. get a 8 core or at least 6 core processor
not really unless you have some money to waste
Yeah do it now!!!!
>>51976113
Do you need an upgrade?
>>51976113
how does it feel to be a closet pedophile?
>>51976120
>>51976303
normies must be on winter break
>>51976163
that looks cool
>>51976113
Nope. If you don't have a SSD yet, get that instead.
Or Linux. It'll also do more for you.
Or a new GPU, if this is about gaming or something.
>>51976303
>closet
ha
>>51976113
>>51976791
>normies
says the newfag/casual with the most entry babbieshit complex. loli is literally starting point tier.
>>51976830
you get triggered by the truth kiddo?
my current spec
i7 2600k
16gb 1333mhz ram
120gb ssd + raid 10 3tb x4
gtx 980ti
>>51976894
> raid 10 3tb x4
You could move that to a RAID 5 or 6 (or the ZFS equivalent of it) on a NAS, rather than having RAID 10 on what's presumably Windows.
>>51976942
>raid 5 or 6
vomit.tar.gz
also i actually use it not just store shit so its not going to a nas
>>51976962
>vomit.tar.gz
Are you retarded? They're clearly superior RAID levels.
> also i actually use it not just store shit so its not going to a nas
... this makes no sense either. Of course you're using HDD to store shit. NAS aren't slow either, unless your network is shit.
>>51976857
i wasn't even one of the people you were replying to, casual.
>>51976992
>raid 5/6
>superior to raid 10
what the fuck am i reading
i have video games on the array i aint going to load up some vidya from a nas
>>51977001
>im an oldfag
>i have been on 4chan since 2002
go back to reddit fag
Nope. 5820k might be, depending on what you're using it for.
>>51977192
>projecting this hard
typical casuals
>>51977211
>casuals
thats all you can come up with?
typical newfag
>>51977192
if you're that old and still haven't grown the fuck up you're quite an embarassement in all honesty
>>51977230
>lolicon
>calls others new
you'll be kicking yourself after you eventually get over your reddit taste
>>51976113
>UPGRADING FROM ANY RECENT I7
LITERALLY POINTLESS, ALMOST NEVER A PERFORMANCE BOTTLENECK
ITS ALL GPU
>>51976894
what board are you using? I'm on an old asus gen 1 z68 that doesn't support a 980ti.
>>51977258
>>lolicon
i dont like loli. i think its silly how you fags waste your time pointing out shit you dislike
i know how /new/ posts, since at one point everyone was, but you are fresh on winter break new
>>51977245
>if you're that old
pssh, im only 19
fuckboi
>>51977336
post more loli
no you dont need to upgrade. if you do though i'll buy your cpu.
>>51976894
>5 year old processor
>paired with one of the most powerful gpus available at the moment
>>51977349
im not >>51976407 or >>51976113
i shitpost from a core2 quad and dont plan to upgrade
>>51977336
time to stop posting reddit
>>51977372
>time to stop posting leddit
you're on your last defense ? try harder
>>51977361
The number of cpu bound videogames can be counted on one hand
>>51977398
good job failing the test and proving you're literally a newfag
>>51977324
ga-p67a-ud3p-b3
>>51977412
>good job failing the test and proving you're literally a newfag
good job making up a test
take note newfag, this is what damage control look like. anyone who has been here a while wouldn't get their feelings hurt by being called new
>>51977466
you seem pretty upset by me accurately identifying you as a newfag.
>making up a test
oh dear
FUCK YOU OP I WAS ABOUT TO GO TO BED. NOW I HAVE ABSOLUTELY URGENT BUSINESS TO TAKE CARE OF.
Oh, and the answer to your >>>/wsr/ is no.
>>51977488
>upset
you know if i wasn't having fun retorting to your posts i would have moved on to a different thread. getting upset over fags on an ANONYMOUS imageboard would be the one of dumbests to do.
but if you're getting upset maybe you should take a walk/nap
or if youre trying to "win" youre never going to get far
>>51977556
yeah keep on backpedalling there newfag.
>>51977566
>yeah keep on backpedalling there newfag.
you have ran out of stuff to come up with.
i'll make this easier.
youre are a newfag who gets upset when people don't agree with you.
ps. your winter break ends soon
@51976113
Sorry to derail this awesome thread, but i just want everyone to know that ive been here for exactly 2 months and 18 days. When can I call myself an oldfag?
>>51977607
never. someone will always call you new
oldfag was a meme that died in 2013
>>51977399
Almost literally this. You're fine anon, no reason to upgrade. Performance increases by processor upgrades have been marginal at best in recent years.
>>51977602
when you try to claim loli is anything but casualbait you already confirm how new you are. why are you still trying to hide that obvious fact,
>>51977832
you took so long and thats all you came up with.
>when you try to claim loli is anything but casualbait you already confirm how new you are. why are you still trying to hide that obvious fact,
you must be really upset
>>51977875
>you took so long
showing how visibly upset you are when you're literally waiting for my reply. seriously what possessed you to come here from reddit last week?
>>51977908
you are mighty upset.
and you've literally ran out of things to say.
if you want you can go back to calling me new
>>51977944
oh nevermind i didnt read the last sentence
>>51976992
>raid5/6
>12TiB, 4 drives
enjoy your snail data rates and failed rebuilds
>>51977445
>>51976894
wew, same motherboard here
i7 2600k
8gb 1600mhz ram
240gb ssd + raid0 1tb x2
gtx 980
>>51977007
> what the fuck am i reading
It is superior.
> i have video games on the array i aint going to load up some vidya from a nas
Ricer / gamer. That explains it...
>>51977984
> snail data rates
With anything that deserves the name "modern computer" you should get >100MB/s on the array.
> and failed rebuilds
... no, just no.
>>51978187
a 12TB array with consumer drives is WELL into failed rebuild territory, and raid5/6 are significantly (just under 100%) more likely to run into an uncorrectable error during a rebuild
and a raid10 array will be significantly faster on both reads and writes than a raid5/6 array; if it was on a nas connected with 1gbps ethernet, yeah it wouldn't make a difference, but that isn't the case for OP.
