Post 'em
>he fell for skymeme
>>51975555
I'm OP and if you didn't know, it's a mobile CPU. 45 watt tdp.
Alright
>>51975616
and how is that en excuse for felling for 2 memes? notebooks and memelake...
bro..
just..
stop...
posting...
I'm out btw peace. hope your e-penis is OK
memers smdh...
>>51975658
Wat?
I didn't fall for anything actually, I received this free from dell and did not pay a dime for it.
That said, my score is probably going to be the highest notebook/45 watt TDP score in this thread.
>>51975288
based redditlake bro well meme'd
8320 @ 4.4 ghz .
multi threaded beast
single thread meh
Unknowing pleb here. Someone either red pill me on what I should look into and or research about processors or fill me in on stuff I should know about processors. And oh boy.. Don't get me started, I've already seen the constant dragging on wars between AMD and intel on /v/ and /g/
>>51975288
stock 4790k
Okay
>>51976036
cool
>>51975763
quality of manufacturing of processor
>skylake's get fucked up by certain heatsinks and can't handle certain ram or the chip will fry
>haswell is perfect and indestructable
speed
>more important than how many cores it has, but computer illiterates think cores=speed
cores/threads
>beneficial for multitasking/VMs/video rendering/audio production
>cs:go is the only game i know that utilizes multiple threads. do not worry about cores/threads for gayming. dual core is just fine
unlocked for overclocking
>do you know what you're doing first of all?
>or do you at least have an idiot-proof mobo with software for OCing for idiots like you?
>otherwise don't fucking worry desu
that's all i can spare. i'm half computer literate, but i'm not some autist freetard who spends all day on /g/. i have a non-tech related job and a girlfriend and a life
>>51976097
Wth it autoposts now when you click "I'm not a robot"?
My CPU won the lottery, sorry guys.
2x Xeon x5650 2.67ghz
Broadwell mobile, not bad
>>51975288
The more interesting button in that window is the stress CPU button.
Click it and see how long it takes your CPU to throttle itself, if it does it at all.
>>51975755
>multi threaded beast
Have a Nehalem from 2010 at 4Ghz
>>51976385
Correction,
Single thread runs at 4.4, but an all core load makes my mobo throttle the CPU to 20x multiplier, therefore the multi thread bench is at 4Ghz
>>51975288
Huh, well this validates my previous theory that a 7870k is just as good as a 6300.
I'll try bumping up to 4.4Ghz if I can later.
>>51975288
I don't get the point of the single threaded benchmark, it's literally just the multithreaded benchmark divided by the number of cores you have. all my cores are still doing a fraction of the work to get the "single" threaded benchmark score.
2500k, bit disappointing 2bh
C2D L9400
>>51976385
Interesting overclock. What is your cooling?
>>51976498
>>51976499
Hyper 212 with two SP120s, a rear 120mm and top 140mm exhaust, a 120mm intake on the backplate.
I will be picking up a Cryorig R1 Ultimate later, though, just for peace of mind.
Prime pushes the chip into the mid 70's at 18C ambient when I set it to 4.36Ghz (218 bus * 20 at 1.33vcore) but she was built to handle 85C all day every day. This bench, doesn't even hit 60C.
At 4.36Ghz on all cores the chip is eating 250 watts.
With ambient temps like these the mobo doesn't go above 36 when I slam it as hard as I can.
The board (asus p6t-deluxe v2) simply has throttling in the firmware that locks the CPU to it's non turbo multi above roughly 185w of draw.
I run into QPI/Uncore theoretical maximums (4Ghz from 3.2 stock, more commonly advertised as 6.4 GigaTransfers) when trying for 4.5Ghz, or 225 * 20
I could crossflash it to the -WS variant BIOS which has a limiter removal but that's a huge pain in the ass for what little gain the chip and motherboard has left in it.
So, sorry for the word vomit, I'll be getting an R1 Ultimate and I'm looking at a x5680. Going to see if I can hit 4.8Ghz on air with 192 * 25, 3.45Ghz QPI
Long Live Nehalem
Such a shitty bin
what the fuck is wrong with my 4790k
4790k @ 4.5ghz
[email protected]
>>51977523
Also these are my temps, Are they getting a little to hot for comfort from stress testing? Or are they ok for everyday use.
[email protected]
Xeon [email protected] (4C/8T)
Was $210 when I bought it last year.
FX 6300 @ 4.4GHz. I can bench with her at 4.9GHz.
>>51975288
how did i do guys?
>>51977929
>1
nice
4770k @ 3.9Ghz
>>51976472
You're doing something wrong, my 2400 is faster than that
>tfw my microserver is faster than my desktop
>>51978274
Switch CPUs
Fite me
>>51978309
Desktop motherboard doesn't support xeon and the i5 2400 doesn't do ecc.
>>51975763
it's simpe. buy amd if you're a total poorfag and don't need to pay your own electricity bill
buy intel from the 3000 series like i5 3570k because they ain't improved except tdp in the last 3 years and it's cheaper.
look for xeon alternatives to save monies aswell
>>51975288
posting
>>51977929
Nice
2x 4 core
>>51979073
>>51979087
>applel
Kek
>>51979073
>>51979087
> not combining screenshots
Kys
>>51979172
nigga come on. how you expect me to read all that shit, by you. look how tiny that is
>>51979104
>implying apple can
>>51979214
Scroll click it.
Could anyone with Athlon X4 860k do this bench I would like to see.
Top Lake ultra meme
>>51979484
What the fuck.
>>51978274
This thing is like 3 and a half years old
Okay for 15W I guess.
Phenom II 955 @ 3.8GHz
Was hoping for a little bit more, damn.
This old fella's served me well at least.
>>51980202
Can you donate me this rig?
>>51980289
Forgot to quote >>51980270
Why would you need it anyway?
>>51980322
Because poor and need something better ;_;
>>51980329
Well I'd honestly just send it to you but I'm waiting for 2016 to grab a new CPU.
>>51980350
o-okay
my t420s result
>>51977020
not OC'd?
>>51979612
top trash
>>51980459
That Multicore score is weak. Why is that? Harsh throttling on multicore loads?
1U-in-a-cardboard-box
>>51980683
>I won't be able to play my childrens' games on this!
>>51975288
poorfag reporting, stock q6600
>>51980699
His is a dual-core. Other benches are showing this isn't getting much boost from hyperthreading, so the difference is probably down to turbo.
>>51980895
>>I won't be able to play my childrens' games on this!
>posts kiddie cartoon image
ebin. simply ebin.
Stop crying poorfag.
>>51980954
>implying that was my machine
Back to /v/, kiddo!
>>51980907
That doesn't seem right. My X3450 shouldn't be even twice as fast as a q6600 (approaching 2x multithreaded, but still under.) You're showing 1/3rd my speeds.
My laptop
>>51980907
That's fucking low for q6600
>>51980994
>Back to /v/, kiddo!
Pic related, literally you right now.
>>51980997
>>51981033
No idea what the issue is. I tried twice (second time with power options on performance) and the result was the same.
>>51981073
Why are you using 32-bit version of CPU-Z?
looks like i wont need to upgrade my cpu for a long time
>>51981093
32 bit OS. 3 GB ram (which is also max my mobo supports). No reason to get 64 bit win 8.1.
>>51981073
Post all CPU-Z windows with it on performance.
>>51977600
4.8?
Voltage?
Temps?
Cooling?
my 6700 @ 4.2ghz
>>51981125
>>51980321
that single thread performance seems so low
>>51979484
those results seem low compared to >>51981174
>>51981187
The only thing that looks off is your memory CAS latency. There's no way you're CAS 2.
Post the SPD tab again but pick a slot number that contains RAM.
>>51980329
I have an extra motherboard with an 8320 in it that's been laying around for a few months.
>>51980202
This also seems low. A 3.8GHz X4 should be running right with my X3450
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/362?vs=108
>>51980841
>>51981464
Live near CT?
At least the battery life is great.
>>51981530
Do you have any idea what might cause this then? Temps are fine, doesn't go above 60ºC and rarely goes above 49.
>>51981538
Columbus, Ohio
I have pretty much everything it takes to make it into another computer, i have a few GPU's laying around, think i lost my old GTX 560, have a brand new power supply, brand new hard drives, just needs a case, but i'm into my intel builds, have a 4770k and a 4790k and an Amd 8320 as a server.
>>51981569
Post all CPU-Z windows.
>>51976105
same result as my 4670k at the same frequency.
Still wish I got 4690 and Z97 chipset mobo. but they weren't on the market when I updated.
Are you guys taking these without any windows open? I noticed I got a 200 point increase when i closed my browser
i5 750 @ 4Ghz
>>51981633
Hmm.. dunno.
Set everything back to stock and bench it again.
(Also, you have 1600MHz RAM that's only currently running at 1333. Once you're done benching it at stock you might want to go back into BIOS and enable the XMP profile for your RAM.)
bredy gud for budget laptop
>>51981569
The benchmark doesn't seem to like AMD Phenoms. Your result is similar to >>51950501
It's nothing to worry about, your CPU is fine.
Seems about right.
>>51977020
It looks like it's only at 4Ghz, maybe 4.1Ghz when using all cores based on your single core score. Overclock it.
>>51981817
heavily oc'd?
>>51981887
You can see the OC in the screenshot.
44x99.98 MHz
>>51981807
Damn, that's weird. I wonder if they were dumb enough to use SSE 4.1/4.2 in a benchmark.
>>51981887
4.4GHz. Not really a heavy OC. I can run it at 4.6GHz, but I don't like how much voltage it needs just for a 200MHz bump.
6700K @ 4.5
>>51982012
That single core score is crazy. Can it go higher than 4.5Ghz? It looks like it can reach 2400 single core at 4.7-4.8Ghz.
3570k @ 4.2
>>51981767
How much it cost you?
Aware and posting
Wish i could run this in CLI on my server :(
Buying intel for my next build.
>>51981969
Let see... dual E5645's? Seems a hair slow to be X5650's.
>>51976161
>>51977689
Xeon 1241v3
I await the merciless ridicule
>>51982064
I got it to 4.7 GHz, but I bluescreened after playing games for a while. Didn't bother trying to find the perfect sweetspot, so I can't really answer whether or not it can be done stable. Just turned it down to 4.5 since there probably isn't that much of a real world difference.
>>51981190
4.7ghz?! 1.3ghz OC. now that's a beastly overclock. how hot does that thing run when all 12 threads are maxed out?
>>51980916
>isn't getting much boost from hyperthreading
I don't know about that,
see
>>51976385
That multi load score was run at 4Ghz with HT, and I ran the bench at my normal clock (about 3.9Ghz, HT off) and got 7650.
2% clock difference, 20% score difference.
>>51982576
>1.152Vcore
Whoa, holy shit, my X5650 runs stock speeds at 1.005 volts.
You should be able to do at least 3.3Ghz, 3.65 turbo at that voltage.
>>51982693
it's at stock settings. I haven't even bothered to overclock or undervolt it again after the CMOS battery was drained and I lost all settings
i5 4670
>>51982184
why don't you like amd anon
itt:
>skylake has the best single threaded performance
>haswell-e has the best multi-core performance
>skylake has the overall best multi-core performance for intels "mainstream" line.
>xeons are multi-tasking beasts
>2010 xeons still offer fantastic performance if overclocked compared to todays offerings
>sandy bridge still shines if heavily overclocked while stock clocked are showing its age
>amd is just sad
Can't get CPU-Z to work on my computer, it's stuck on "DMI" while loading, and just fils ram and hog a core on my CPU.
>>51982854
Probably because Skylake at 4.5Ghz has 70% better single core performance than an FX at 4.6GHz. If they were both at 4.5Ghz, the difference would be even bigger.
Not that anon, but that's probably why.
Look at this bad motherfucker.
>>51982979
In Geekbench 3, the i7 6700k has 110% better single core performance than the FX 8350. How accurate is that?
>>51980202
>tfw A10 is "better"
>>51983014
Almost same single threaded performance
Should have bought a q6600 instead of getting this
>>51980202
Should have bought a q6600. See mine lel >>51983014
>>51983041
It clocks to 3.6GHz, but I don't like so much Vcore after a decade.
>>51981545
it score better than a 120watt AMD single threaded
>>51983041
How is it possible that your FX clocked at 4.4GHz has about the same perfs as this one >>51983014. Just how.
>>51983084
>AMD
>>51983084
Never obsolete it seems
>tfw could have bought a q9200 for 20 dollars to replace E5300
>>51983014
>10 years old intel CPU is on par with 2 years old AMD CPUs
You can't make up this shit.
What's the point of having anything better than AMD E-350 CPU?
Are you guys gaymers or what?
>>51983178
>it can run W10
>>51983178
Because it's shit.
Even A8/A10 APU is better and not so shit if you're not a fuckin' casual
>>51983178
n-no I make webms sometimes
3770k @ 5.0 GHz
>>51983207
Except it's a 11 inch netbook, nigger
It cost me $30 year ago and that's the cutest mobile device I've ever used.
It's also equpped with GOBI 2000 WWAN module, Intel 6205 wifi card, two 1W speakers and a LED backlight.
It's a thinkpad by the way. The CPU is undervolted and it's very cool. The fan only spins up when I play l4d2 or full hd videos. Disregard the CPU readings because the internal CPU diode is faulty. It's not that hot.
>>51983178
>steam
>>51983284
Here it is. Beautiful, isn't it?
CPU is good enough to handle internet browsing, watching porn and movies, playing l4d2, accessing ssh through openvpn 3g connections and listening to music in my car.
Seriously, having overpowered CPUs is such a waste. All you need is optimised software
>>51983325
>All you need is optimised software
So not Windows?
>>51983249
Cooler?
>>51983337
You'd be surprised how shitty Debian runs on it.
Windows 10 is fully usable for everything I've mentioned before
>>51983345
It's just an old Corsair H100. I normally cannot execute synthetic benchmarks at 5 GHz. For example, Passmark must be done at 4.8 GHz. My vCore on the 5GHz run was pretty bad... Close to 1.47.
>>51975755
>single core score
Is that a joke? Even my laptop does better.
Okay....?
>>51983448
Somethings wrong breh.
>multi core score that low
>>51983448
Its the clock frequency difference. If the 5960x was clocked the same as your chip the single core would be different. Nice CPU though
>>51976385
>4.4ghz X5650
Lucky bastard. I can barely hit 4.1 stable.
I'm also kinda on edge because I just ordered a 4790k and I'm worried I made a bad choice.
>>51975288
core i7 965. One of the old processors that is still good today.
Legit score
>>51983472
>>51983473
Turns out CPU-z locks the CPU performance for some reason, because I did a bench test while running GTAV. But for some reason got the same score after turning of the game.
I had to restart CPU-z for it to de-retard itself.
>>51983517
>>51983178 here
did you try using BrazosTweaker to undervolt the CPU?
Is my CPU good?
i7 4770
>>51983551
What's BrazosTweaker?
5930k
>non-K
No it's kinda shit.
>>51983517
Why?
That cpu is near worthless. Literally. I almost killed my self using an E2-1800 chip. Even with an SSD its slow.
>>51983583
but 4770k doesn't have vt-d
sorry if you weren't talking to me
>>51983576
If you dont know then dont mess with it. enough said.
>>51983598
I was talking to you and the non-K is shit.
>>51983249
wow at 5ghz it matches a 6700k at 4.2ghz >>51981174
>>51983576
Windows program capable for controlling CPU and NB voltages
https://code.google.com/p/brazostweaker/
You can try lowering the voltages to 1,2V/1,05V/0,825V for the CPU (1.6GHz/1.2GHz/0.8GHz states) and 0,8/0,75V for the NB.
>>51983621
thanks
>>51976859
>>51983484 here.
Honestly, I might as well ask while another X5650 user is somewhat around, what advice do you have for OCing an X5650 anyway?
I have an h80i for cooling and an EVGA X58 FTW3 board. Temps aren't an issue since I idle at 30c and dont go higher than 50c during gaming.
I dont know if I just have a bad chip or board, or just dont know what I'm doing, but I've had no luck whatsoever breaching past 4.1ghz.
>>51983626
tbqh senpai its quite rare for a 3770 to hit 5ghz at decent volts and be fully stable.
>>51983639
No problem, now enjoy your crippled shit CPU that can't run at 4.0+GHz.
>>51983606
BrazosTweaker is idiot-proof. You can't damage anything with it, unless you bump the CPU voltage to extremely high value
>>51983649
Enjoy yours that is missing vt-d
>>51983588
I need a computer. I try to do as much as I can on my tablet but at the end of the day I need to use this PC to get stuff done.
>>51983643
>50c
Are you using RealTemp to check your max temp?
>>51983656
>You can't damage anything with it
ok
>unless you bump the CPU voltage to extremely high value
But I thought you said you couldnt damage anything with it?
>>51983661
>Missing a feature that I never use anyway because there's no need to emulate an OS to run the programs I use.
Nothing of value was lost.
>>51983690
Or just get a devils canyon haswell or newer K series AND have VT-d....
>>51983041
a lot of people on /g, and virtual everywhere else has been saying this for years.
a single piledriver core at 4ghz matches the single threaded performance of a 2009 i7 nehalem based core at 2.6ghz.
back in the day overclocked core 2 duos in the 3ghz oc range came close to, or matched nehalem based cpus at stock.
amd bulldozer and piledriver based processor are extremely weak. the only benefit to them is the multitasking. a 6350 as you have, or a 8350 offer much better multitasking, but for most games that utilize <= 4 threads, and every day stuff, you can beat a q6600. its raw power is amazing.
>>51983667
I had been using coretemp and the cpu temp display on the motherboard itself.
>>51983718
Or simply ignore vt-d since it's not needed unless you use a shitbeard distro that have to emulate windows since that's the OS that actual stuff can run on.
>>51983755
Use RealTemp instead.
CoreTemp doesn't even read the current speed if you use EIST/C1E.
>>51983811
I dont use c-states so that isn't an issue for me, but I'll go ahead and download it it.
>>51981292
>Post the SPD tab again but pick a slot number that contains RAM.
CPU-Z didn't give any info on either of the slots. Luckily, speccy was able to work. Pic related.
>>51978274
what do you do with that server
oki
>>51981464
>Killer Atheros
the 2nd nic on those (INTEL) is superior in performance
>>51984421
Ok, Speccy is reading it as CAS 4, which is what it should be. CPU-Z was probably just reading it wrong, since I doubt you'd boot at CAS 2.
Anyway, my guess it you're hitting the same problem the Phenoms are with this benchmark. Your processor is probably fine, it's just the benchmark doesn't like it.
6700k at a mild 4.5GHz
>>51984679
>picture of a screen
>>51978316
What the fuck is this
>>51984684
Didn't feel like having to screencap and cut and shit
>>51975288
Posting
>>51983643
I've found that Nehalem/Westmeres with locked multipliers are finicky.
You have to make sure the uncore and QPI are at the very least a 1:1 ratio for the machine to boot. Generally it's most stable at about a 1.125:1 ratio (3700 QPI to 1650 RAM AKA 3300Mhz uncore, for example).
I do not run triple channel (yet) and I have heard that triple channel causes instability issues.
I have to overvolt the QPI/Uncore bus to nearly the maximum safe limit (1.4ish) to be stable above 3800
I have to overvolt to maximum safe (1.35 to the CPU which is 1.375 on the board, on air is Intel's own limit before physical damage) on the CPU to run 4.4Ghz
I haven't tested otherwise, but I turn off all virtualization options and obviously all power saving functions.
The machine will boot and run benches at 218*20, 4.36Ghz with hyperthreading on but the temps and power draw are fucking MASSIVE.
As I said, the system cannot really handle going higher than 4.4 at 20x because I hit the 8Ghz QPI/Uncore theoretical limit.
And to be fair, I am not good at overclocking. The fine interplay between ram speed, timing, the uncore and QPI elude me.
With all that said,
If you want to shoot for higher clocks you'll need to buy the x5670 or x5680.
I'd honestly much rather be doing 4Ghz at 181 bus than 4Ghz at 200, and with the more pricey 5680 it would be achievable at 160 bus.
4820k @ 4.5ghz
>>51981190
>1.48v
What cooling and temps?
>>51976131
You are running some pretty high voltage. What are your temps at 100% utilization?
is this bad? Stock speed fx8350 and CM Evo 212
>>51984878
>running a benchmark with active programs in the background
Try again, this time have only CPU-Z running. Exit every thing you possibly can.
Playing music lowers my score 5-10%
>>51984989
>Playing music lowers my score 5-10%
how shit is your computer?
>>51985001
scores 9600 on the multi thread bench, you tell me.
The equalizer function and volume normalization DSP take a good bit of CPU for real-time playback
>Q4'07
Still better than AMD FX :)
>>51983448
>>51983435
how does it feel to be beaten by a Pentium G328 with music and other programs in the background
I need to upgrade this piece of shit.
>>51984485
Qbittorrent, plex, backup, a couple of VMs
>>51984719
Pic related. Zotac ID18. Had it for 2 years and just sits in my living room connected to the TV for plex, Netflix and jewtube.
>>51986000
Just say what the fuck it is already
>>51975288
>2015
>8 years old CPU
>no need to upgrade
What a depressing world to be living in. And 2016 is the 10th anniversary since the launce of Core 2.
AMD A10 5800K APU
OC: 4.4GHz
>>51977929
that shitty 1 core cpu is still faster than this
>>51985735
fucking beast
Huh? That's disappointing.
Mostly because it does everything I need exceedingly quick, hence I thought that was enough to make it "good".
Heh. Guess not.
Perhaps I should reschedule the upgrade from 2025 to 2020... Oh well.
>>51984757
snipping tool.
use it. love it.
>>51986975
thats pretty sad
The fuck is this shit
>>51981628
I am assuming CPU-Z multi thread doesn't support hyper threading though.
>>51987260
you are fail
get rekt all of you
>>51987370
Fuck Windows 10 >:(
>>51987260
>>51987491
After the system crash I was able to start it.
>tfw
C2Q 4 lyfe
>>51986975
heres another atom
I wasn't going to willing to pause Bill Bailey while running it
>>51987867
I also forgot how to english
i7 3770 nonk here
>>51988643
im a retard
>>51976472
asus software is pure fucking garbage, and it also sends some data to some fucking chinese servers, check with wireshark if you want
>>51975639
so my 3770 >>51988666
is better than your 4770 ?
holy shit you are doing something wrong
>>51988666
that devil dubs-trips
>>51975288
:/ feelsbadman
>>51988957
Overclock that thing
>>51988841
What's your overclock?
I might get a 4690k soon.
>>51988841
>>51989174
Nevermind just noticed it.
I have mine at 1.2v and 4.2.
Pretty impressed with mine after looking at all the others in this thread
This is the same after closing Firefox. Multi threaded went up.
>>51989231
Just be glad it didn't bend yet.
>>51989294
I didn't buy the absolutely largest, heaviest cooler on the market, I didn't tighten it down with an electric screwdriver, and I don't have a website that needs clicks. Funny it's only reported months after launch, from one site. Coincidence, I'm sure.
>>51989366
It was a joke, calm down friend. You don't have to justify your purchases on /g/.
>>51989444
I'm happy I took gee's advise and got an i5 instead of an i7 looking at these scores.
>>51989201
4.4 @ 1.310
>>51988708
It's checking for updates you autist.
That said, it is garbage
>>51987152
It doesn't seem to give an accurate result for Athlon IIs, Phenom IIs, or Kentsfields.
