What's a good successor to a 2500K? I love the CPU but I need something with better power usage and for a more modern ITX board.
>>51956909
4790k
>>51956960
i5, not i7. I don't need hyperthreading.
>>51957014
4790k with hyperthreading disabled.
>>51957317
That's wasting $100
>>51956909
4460
>>51956909
6600k
Derp
or 6600/6500 of you're a pleb.
Skylake is not a meme and it's being proven over and over again as time goes on.
>>51956909
also a 2500k owner
I say wait till the next intel generation save up your sheckels
>>51957882
True. I just really want to get rid of the giant tower and go for a ITX build.
>>51957014
4690K, then
>>51957902
If someone made ITX with easily configurable chain linking to other devices. Like a seperate graphics card or extra computers, they would make a ton of money.
>>51957978
But why?
>>51957989
To keep it snug as in plug and play. Plus easier to move around.
>>51958023
You have no idea what you're talking about.
>>51958029
Fuck you, you just don't understand. like you could hook up two small computers together and have a super computer
>>51958146
That's not really how desktops work.
>>51957882
This.
Wait for 10 core broadwell.
>>51958175
I think that's a bit of a jump for OP.
>>51958146
This isn't how desktop computers work.
>>51958161
Uh yes it is. How else do you explain server farms
basically any haswell i5.
>>51958255
Go back to /v/
>>51957978
>>51958023
>>51958146
>>51958255
>mfw he just described a console
>mfw the xbox 360 can link up to two others and play forza on three monitors at the same time.
>>>/v/
>>51956909
>>51957014
>dont need hyperthreading
Why not
>>51957839
negative connotation?
who's he kidding
